Associations Between Hepatic and Pancreatic Steatosis with Lumbar Spinal Bone Marrow Fat: A Single-Center Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

被引:1
|
作者
Abbasoglu, Akin [1 ]
Karcaaltincaba, Musturay [1 ]
Karaosmanoglu, Ali Devrim [1 ]
Ozmen, Mustafa Nasuh [1 ]
Akata, Deniz [1 ]
Idilman, Ilkay S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hacettepe Univ, Dept Radiol, Liver Imaging Team, Fac Med, Ankara, Turkiye
关键词
Liver; pancreas; lumbar; steatosis; MRI-PDFF; LIVER-DISEASE; MRI; QUANTIFICATION; FRACTION; POPULATION; PREVALENCE; NAFLD;
D O I
10.5152/tjg.2023.22225
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
<bold>Background: </bold>To evaluate the associations between hepatic, pancreatic steatosis, and lumbar spinal bone marrow fat determined by magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction in patients with no known or suspected liver disease. <bold>Methods: </bold>A total of 200 patients who were referred to our radiology department for upper abdominal magnetic resonance imaging between November 2015 and November 2017 were included in this study. All patients underwent a magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction on a 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging system. <bold>Results: </bold>The mean liver, pancreas, and lumbar magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction were 7.52 +/- 4.82%, 5.25 +/- 5.44%, and 46.85 +/- 10.38% in the study population. There were significant correlations between liver and pancreas (rs = 0.180, P = .036), liver and lumbar (rs = 0.317, P < .001), and pancreas and lumbar magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction (rs = 0.215, P = .012) in female patients. A weak correlation was observed between liver and lumbar magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction (rs = 0.174, P = .014) in the total population. The prevalence of hepatic and pancreatic steatosis was 42.5% and 29%, respectively. The prevalence of pancreatic steatosis (42.9% vs. 22.8%, P = .004) was higher in male patients compared to female patients. In subgroup analysis, in patients with hepatic steatosis, there were higher pancreas magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction (6.07 +/- 6.42% vs. 4.66 +/- 4.53%, P = .036) and lumbar magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction (48.81 +/- 10.01% vs. 45.40 +/- 10.46%, P =.029) compared to patients without hepatic steatosis. In patients with pancreatic steatosis, there were higher liver (9.07 +/- 6.08 vs. 6.87 +/- 4.06, P = .009) and lumbar magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction (49.31 +/- 9.13% vs.45.83 +/- 10.76%, P = .032) in comparison with patients without pancreatic steatosis. <bold>Conclusion: </bold>Based on the results of the present study, fat accumulation in liver, pancreas, and lumbar vertebra have associations with more evident in females.
引用
收藏
页码:618 / 625
页数:105
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Quantify Fat and Steatosis in the Pancreas in Patients after Bariatric Surgery: a Retrospective Study
    Blaho, Martin
    Machackova, Jitka
    Dite, Petr
    Holeczy, Pavol
    Sedivy, Petr
    Psar, Robert
    Svagera, Zdenek
    Vilimek, Dominik
    Toman, Daniel
    Urban, Ondrej
    Buzga, Marek
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2022, 32 (11) : 3666 - 3674
  • [22] Impact of Lumbar Surgery on Pharmacological Treatment for Patients with Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
    Imai, Takaya
    Nagai, Sota
    Michikawa, Takehiro
    Inagaki, Risa
    Kawabata, Soya
    Ito, Kaori
    Hachiya, Kurenai
    Takeda, Hiroki
    Ikeda, Daiki
    Yamada, Shigeki
    Fujita, Nobuyuki
    Kaneko, Shinjiro
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (06)
  • [23] A Comparative Study of Ultrasound Attenuation Imaging, Controlled Attenuation Parameters, and Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy for the Detection of Hepatic Steatosis
    Bao, Jingwen
    Lv, Yueming
    Wang, Kun
    Wang, Quanwen
    Chen, Yanling
    Dong, Yi
    Zhu, Yuli
    Wang, Wenping
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2023, 42 (07) : 1481 - 1489
  • [24] Is There an Association Between Pain and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Parameters in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis?
    Burgstaller, Jakob M.
    Schuffler, Peter J.
    Buhmann, Joachim M.
    Andreisek, Gustav
    Winklhofer, Sebastian
    Del Grande, Filippo
    Mattle, Michele
    Brunner, Florian
    Karakoumis, Georgios
    Steurer, Johann
    Held, Ulrike
    SPINE, 2016, 41 (17) : E1053 - E1062
  • [25] The role of cranial magnetic resonance imaging findings in pediatric epilepsy: A single-center experience
    Yapici, Ozge
    Uzunhan, Tugce Aksu
    NORTHERN CLINICS OF ISTANBUL, 2024, 11 (01) : 72 - 80
  • [26] Correlation between magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) and liver biopsy to assess hepatic steatosis in obesity
    Wibulpolprasert, Pornphan
    Subpinyo, Benya
    Chirnaksorn, Supphamat
    Shantavasinkul, Prapimporn Chattranukulchai
    Putadechakum, Supanee
    Phongkitkarun, Sith
    Sritara, Chanika
    Angkathunyakul, Napat
    Sumritpradit, Preeda
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01)
  • [27] Current Status and Issues Concerning Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with a Magnetic Resonance Conditional Cardiac Implantable Electrical Device: A Single-center Study
    Ikeya, Yukitoshi
    Nakai, Toshiko
    Kogawa, Rikitake
    Kurokawa, Sayaka
    Nagashima, Koichi
    Watanabe, Ryuta
    Arai, Masaru
    Otsuka, Naoto
    Kunimoto, Satoshi
    Okumura, Yasuo
    INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2021, 60 (12) : 1813 - 1818
  • [28] The visibility of prostate cancer concerning underlying histopathological variances: A single-center multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging study
    Arslan, Aydan
    Alis, Deniz
    Tuna, Mustafa Bilal
    Saglican, Yesim
    Kural, Ali Riza
    Karaarslan, Ercan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 141
  • [29] Prevalence and characteristics of the aberrant anterior tibial artery: a single-center magnetic resonance imaging study and scoping review
    Marin-Concha, Julio
    Rengifo, Pablo
    Tapia, Pedro
    Kaiser, Daniel
    Siepmann, Timo
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [30] Clinical Usage of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Single-Center Experience in the New Era of Cardiovascular Imaging
    Ozden, Ozge
    Tokdil, Hasan
    Tokdil, Kardelen Ohtaroglu
    Sevgican, Cihan Ilyas
    Bingol, Gulsum
    ISTANBUL MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 23 (04): : 264 - 268