Associations Between Hepatic and Pancreatic Steatosis with Lumbar Spinal Bone Marrow Fat: A Single-Center Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

被引:1
|
作者
Abbasoglu, Akin [1 ]
Karcaaltincaba, Musturay [1 ]
Karaosmanoglu, Ali Devrim [1 ]
Ozmen, Mustafa Nasuh [1 ]
Akata, Deniz [1 ]
Idilman, Ilkay S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hacettepe Univ, Dept Radiol, Liver Imaging Team, Fac Med, Ankara, Turkiye
关键词
Liver; pancreas; lumbar; steatosis; MRI-PDFF; LIVER-DISEASE; MRI; QUANTIFICATION; FRACTION; POPULATION; PREVALENCE; NAFLD;
D O I
10.5152/tjg.2023.22225
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
<bold>Background: </bold>To evaluate the associations between hepatic, pancreatic steatosis, and lumbar spinal bone marrow fat determined by magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction in patients with no known or suspected liver disease. <bold>Methods: </bold>A total of 200 patients who were referred to our radiology department for upper abdominal magnetic resonance imaging between November 2015 and November 2017 were included in this study. All patients underwent a magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction on a 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging system. <bold>Results: </bold>The mean liver, pancreas, and lumbar magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction were 7.52 +/- 4.82%, 5.25 +/- 5.44%, and 46.85 +/- 10.38% in the study population. There were significant correlations between liver and pancreas (rs = 0.180, P = .036), liver and lumbar (rs = 0.317, P < .001), and pancreas and lumbar magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction (rs = 0.215, P = .012) in female patients. A weak correlation was observed between liver and lumbar magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction (rs = 0.174, P = .014) in the total population. The prevalence of hepatic and pancreatic steatosis was 42.5% and 29%, respectively. The prevalence of pancreatic steatosis (42.9% vs. 22.8%, P = .004) was higher in male patients compared to female patients. In subgroup analysis, in patients with hepatic steatosis, there were higher pancreas magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction (6.07 +/- 6.42% vs. 4.66 +/- 4.53%, P = .036) and lumbar magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction (48.81 +/- 10.01% vs. 45.40 +/- 10.46%, P =.029) compared to patients without hepatic steatosis. In patients with pancreatic steatosis, there were higher liver (9.07 +/- 6.08 vs. 6.87 +/- 4.06, P = .009) and lumbar magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction (49.31 +/- 9.13% vs.45.83 +/- 10.76%, P = .032) in comparison with patients without pancreatic steatosis. <bold>Conclusion: </bold>Based on the results of the present study, fat accumulation in liver, pancreas, and lumbar vertebra have associations with more evident in females.
引用
收藏
页码:618 / 625
页数:105
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Diagnostic performance of quantitative ultrasonography for hepatic steatosis in a health screening program: a prospective single-center study
    Pyo, Jeung Hui
    Cho, Soo Jin
    Choi, Sung Chul
    Jee, Jae Hwan
    Yun, Jeeyeong
    Hwang, Jeong Ah
    Park, Goeun
    Kim, Kyunga
    Kang, Wonseok
    Kang, Mira
    Byun, Young Hye
    ULTRASONOGRAPHY, 2024, 43 (04) : 250 - 262
  • [12] Relationship between controlled attenuated parameter and magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction for evaluating hepatic steatosis in patients with NAFLD
    An, Ziming
    Liu, Qiaohong
    Zeng, Wenli
    Wang, Yan
    Zhang, Qian
    Pei, Huafu
    Xin, Xin
    Yang, Shuohui
    Lu, Fang
    Zhao, Yu
    Hu, Yiyang
    Feng, Qin
    HEPATOLOGY COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 6 (08) : 1975 - 1986
  • [13] Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in glioma surgery: a single-center experience
    Mirzayeva, Leyla
    Ucar, Murat
    Kaymaz, Ahmet Memduh
    Temel, Esra
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2024, 168 (02) : 249 - 257
  • [14] The spectrum of magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF), magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), and two different histopathologic methods (artificial intelligence vs. pathologist) in quantifying hepatic steatosis
    Kim, Jeong Woo
    Lee, Chang Hee
    Yang, Zepa
    Kim, Baek-Hui
    Lee, Young-Sun
    Kim, Kyeong Ah
    QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2022, 12 (11) : 5251 - 5262
  • [15] Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: a single-center prospective study
    Yadava, Mrinal
    Nugent, Matthew
    Krebsbach, Angela
    Minnier, Jessica
    Jessel, Peter
    Henrikson, Charles A.
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 50 (01) : 95 - 104
  • [16] Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy for non-invasive characterization of azoospermia: A prospective comparative single-center study
    Said, Ahmed Hesham
    Ragab, Ahmed
    Zohdy, Wael
    Ibrahim, Ahmed Sayed
    Abd El Basset, Ahmed Sayed
    ANDROLOGY, 2023, 11 (06) : 1096 - 1106
  • [17] Reliability of ultrasound hepatorenal index and magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction techniques in the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis, with magnetic resonance spectroscopy as the reference standard
    Van Tran, Bien
    Ujita, Kouichi
    Taketomi-Takahashi, Ayako
    Hirasawa, Hiromi
    Suto, Takayuki
    Tsushima, Yoshito
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (08):
  • [18] Pattern of structural magnetic resonance imaging lesions in the patients with progressive cognitive decline: A single-center study in Southeast Nigeria
    Ezeala-Adikaibe, Birinus Adikaibe
    Oti, B. Bibiana
    Ohaegbulam, Samuel C.
    Ndubuisi, Chika Anele
    Okwudili, Okwuonodulu
    WEST AFRICAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 29 (01) : 59 - 66
  • [19] A single-center experience of magnetic resonance imaging findings of fetal sacrococcygeal teratomas
    Tosun, Mesude
    Cam, Isa
    Uslu, Hande
    Dogan, Yasemin
    Anik, Yonca
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 52 (04) : 1190 - 1196
  • [20] Accuracy of Coronal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Diagnosis of Multi-Segmental Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis
    Li, Jiantian
    Jia, Jingyu
    Wu, Tianlong
    Yuan, Jinghong
    Tang, Tao
    Jiang, Zhangyuan
    He, Dingwen
    Cheng, Xigao
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2023, 29