Causal relationship between Type 1 diabetes and osteoporosis and fracture occurrence: a two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis

被引:12
作者
Tang, Y. [1 ]
Zhang, L. [2 ]
Ye, D. [1 ]
Zhao, A. [1 ]
Liu, Y. [1 ]
Zhang, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Lab Med, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Gen Practice Ward, Int Med Ctr Ward,Gen Practice Med Ctr, Chengdu, Peoples R China
关键词
Mendelian randomization; Osteoporosis; Type; 1; diabetes; RISK; POWER; METAANALYSIS; BIAS;
D O I
10.1007/s00198-023-06734-6
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
We used two-sample Mendelian Randomization to reveal causal estimates of type 1 diabetes and bone. Type 1 diabetes was found to be a risk factor for bone metabolic health, although there was no clear evidence to support a genetic association between type 1 diabetes and osteoporosis and fracture risk.IntroductionBased on the random assignment of gametes at conception, Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis simulates randomized controlled trials in an observational setting. Therefore, we used MR to assess the association causality of type 1 diabetes (T1D) with fractures and osteoporosis.MethodsFrom a genome-wide association meta-analysis, independent single nucleotide polymorphisms closely associated with T1D were selected as instrumental variables. Data on fracture and osteoporosis were obtained from the FinnGen Consortium. We performed a two-sample MR analysis, using inverse-variance weighted (IVW) as the primary analysis method, to assess possible causal associations between T1D and bone risk. The results were verified by MR-Egger regression and median weighted method (WME). MR-PRESSO and MR-Egger intercepts were used to evaluate the horizontal pleiotropy of instrumental variables, and the Q-test and "leave-one-out" methods were used to test the heterogeneity of MR results.ResultsIVW (OR=1.040, 95% CI=0.974-1.109, P=0.238), MR-Egger regression (OR=1.077, 95% CI=0.921-1.260, P=0.372) and WME (OR=1.021, 95% CI=0.935-1.114, P=0.643) all showed that there was no causal relationship between T1D and osteoporosis, but the direction was consistent. The indicative significance of IVW results in T1D and forearm fractures (OR=1.062, 95% CI=1.010-1.117, P=0.020), but the results are not robust enough. There was no causal effect in femur, lumbar and pelvis, or shoulder and upper arm fractures.ConclusionsAfter MR analysis, although T1D may be a risk factor for bone health, we do not have sufficient evidence to support a causal effect of T1D on osteoporosis and fractures at a genetically predicted level. More cases need to be included for analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:1111 / 1117
页数:7
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [21] Analysis of overlapping genetic association in type 1 and type 2 diabetes
    Inshaw, Jamie R. J.
    Sidore, Carlo
    Cucca, Francesco
    Stefana, M. Irina
    Crouch, Daniel J. M.
    McCarthy, Mark I.
    Mahajan, Anubha
    Todd, John A.
    [J]. DIABETOLOGIA, 2021, 64 (06) : 1342 - 1347
  • [22] HemoglobinA1c Is a Risk Factor for Changes of Bone Mineral Density: A Mendelian Randomization Study
    Ji, Xiaoxiao
    Hong, Jianqiao
    Qu, Zihao
    Yang, Weinan
    Wang, Yibo
    Lin, Jiyan
    Li, Congsun
    Wang, Jie
    Mou, Haochen
    Shi, Mingmin
    Zhou, Chenhe
    Wang, Wei
    Lin, Changjian
    Yan, Shigui
    Wu, Haobo
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [23] Hip Structural Analysis Reveals Impaired Hip Geometry in Girls With Type 1 Diabetes
    Joseph, Taisha, V
    Caksa, Signe
    Misra, Madhusmita
    Mitchell, Deborah M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2020, 105 (12)
  • [24] PhenoScanner V2: an expanded tool for searching human genotype-phenotype associations
    Kamat, Mihir A.
    Blackshaw, James A.
    Young, Robin
    Surendran, Praveen
    Burgess, Stephen
    Danesh, John
    Butterworth, Adam S.
    Staley, James R.
    [J]. BIOINFORMATICS, 2019, 35 (22) : 4851 - 4853
  • [25] Consequences of Diabetes Mellitus in Bone Health: Traditional Review
    Kumari, Cheena
    Yagoub, Ghozlan
    Ashfaque, Mariam
    Jawed, Sobia
    Hamid, Pousette
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (03)
  • [26] Biphasic fracture risk in diabetes: A population-based study
    Leslie, William D.
    Lix, Lisa M.
    Prior, Heather J.
    Derksen, Shelley
    Metge, Colleen
    O'Neil, John
    [J]. BONE, 2007, 40 (06) : 1595 - 1601
  • [27] Fasting glucose, bone area and bone mineral density: a Mendelian randomisation study
    Mitchell, Adam
    Larsson, Susanna C.
    Fall, Tove
    Melhus, Hakan
    Michaelsson, Karl
    Byberg, Liisa
    [J]. DIABETOLOGIA, 2021, 64 (06) : 1348 - 1357
  • [28] Efficient Design for Mendelian Randomization Studies: Subsample and 2-Sample Instrumental Variable Estimators
    Pierce, Brandon L.
    Burgess, Stephen
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 178 (07) : 1177 - 1184
  • [29] Power and instrument strength requirements for Mendelian randomization studies using multiple genetic variants
    Pierce, Brandon L.
    Ahsan, Habibul
    VanderWeele, Tyler J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 40 (03) : 740 - 752
  • [30] Diabetes and Bone Fragility
    Romero-Diaz, Camila
    Duarte-Montero, Daniela
    Gutierrez-Romero, Sebastian A.
    Mendivil, Carlos O.
    [J]. DIABETES THERAPY, 2021, 12 (01) : 71 - 86