Identifying Attributes for a Value Assessment Framework in China: A Qualitative Study

被引:4
|
作者
Zhang, Mengmeng [1 ]
Bao, Yun [2 ]
Yang, Yi [3 ]
Kimber, Melissa [1 ,4 ]
Levine, Mitchell [1 ,5 ]
Xie, Feng [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Hlth Res Methods Evidence & Impact, 1280 Main St West, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
[2] Gansu Prov Hosp, Inst Clin Res & Evidence Based Med, Lanzhou, Gansu, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, Key Lab Hlth Technol Assessment, Natl Hlth Commiss, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] McMaster Univ, Offord Ctr Child Studies, Dept Psychiat & Behav Neurosci, Hamilton, ON L8L 0A4, Canada
[5] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, Div Clin Pharmacol & Toxicol, Hamilton, ON L8N 4A6, Canada
[6] McMaster Univ, Ctr Hlth Econ & Policy Anal CHEPA, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
关键词
MULTICRITERIA DECISION-ANALYSIS; HEALTH TECHNOLOGY-ASSESSMENT; ECONOMICS APPROACH; ANALYSIS MCDA; CARE;
D O I
10.1007/s40273-022-01235-6
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
BackgroundValue assessment frameworks (VAFs) are promising tools for measuring the value of health technologies and informing coverage policymaking; however, most published VAFs were developed for high-income countries. This study aimed to identify value attributes as part of the development of a VAF in China.MethodsWe used the qualitative description approach. Specifically, we conducted open-ended semi-structured interviews with Chinese stakeholders, as well as a review and analysis of publicly available government documents related to health technology assessment (HTA) and coverage policies in China. Conventional content analysis and the constant comparison technique were used to generate value attributes. Multiple criteria were used to determine the inclusion of a value attribute, with response levels of included attributes finalized via consensus meetings among the research team.ResultsThirty-four stakeholders living or working in China completed the semi-structured interview. These stakeholders included policymakers (n = 4), healthcare providers (n = 8), HTA researchers (n = 6), patients and members of the general public (n = 9), and industry representatives (n = 7). In addition, 16 government documents were included for analysis. Twelve value attributes grouped in eight categories are included in the VAF: (1) severity of disease; (2) health benefit, including survival, clinical outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes; (3) safety; (4) economic impact, including budget impact to payer and patients, and cost effectiveness; (5) innovation; (6) organizational impact; (7) health equity; and (8) quality of evidence.ConclusionThese 12 value attributes were identified for the development of a VAF to support health technologies' value assessment and coverage policymaking in China.
引用
收藏
页码:439 / 455
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] How is knowledge shared in Public involvement? A qualitative study of involvement in a health technology assessment
    Cockcroft, Emma J.
    Britten, Nicky
    Long, Linda
    Liabo, Kristin
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2020, 23 (02) : 348 - 357
  • [22] Challenges of the Relative Value Unit Experience in Iran: A Qualitative Study
    Forootan, Sara
    Hajebrahimi, Sakineh
    Najafi, Behzad
    Janati, Ali
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2021, 15 (05): : 1249 - 1255
  • [23] Nurses' experience of prehospital sepsis assessment: a qualitative study
    Reeves, Lara
    Rubenson-Wahlin, Rebecka
    Andersson, Emma Hei Rim
    Bjerkander, Matteus
    Djarv, Therese
    Bohm, Katarina
    Vicente, Veronica
    CONTEMPORARY NURSE, 2024, 60 (06) : 673 - 682
  • [24] Nursing assessment of pediatric preoperative anxiety: a qualitative study?*
    Molina, Carmen Jerez
    Valls, Laura Lahuerta
    Villegas, Victoria Fernandez
    Ruiz, Susana Santos
    REVISTA LATINO-AMERICANA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2023, 31
  • [25] Assessing the development of health technology assessment in Iran: a policy analysis using Kingdon's Multiple streams framework: a qualitative study
    Behzadifar, Meysam
    Shahabi, Saeed
    Bakhtiari, Ahad
    Azari, Samad
    Ehsanzadeh, Seyed Jafar
    Yarahmadi, Mohammad
    Behzadifar, Masoud
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [26] Expert patient and general practitioners' perspectives on the clinical attributes needed to deal with uncertainty: a qualitative study
    Ghosh, Tania
    Blair, Erik
    JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE, 2025, 17 (01) : 23 - 29
  • [27] Identifying Attrition Phases in Survey Data: Applicability and Assessment Study
    Hochheimer, Camille J.
    Sabo, Roy T.
    Perera, Robert A.
    Mukhopadhyay, Nitai
    Krist, Alex H.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (08)
  • [28] Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) for evaluating new medicines in Health Technology Assessment and beyond: The Advance Value Framework
    Angelis, Aris
    Kanavos, Panos
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2017, 188 : 137 - 156
  • [29] The roles and responsibilities of general practice nurses in China: a qualitative study
    Jin, Xue
    Pan, Zihan
    Hou, Shuxiao
    Pang, Hui
    Dong, Aimei
    Hu, Lin
    Brown, Steven
    Plester, Gail
    Chi, Chunhua
    BMC PRIMARY CARE, 2024, 25 (01):
  • [30] Getting added value from using qualitative research with randomized controlled trials: a qualitative interview study
    O'Cathain, Alicia
    Goode, Jackie
    Drabble, Sarah J.
    Thomas, Kate J.
    Rudolph, Anne
    Hewison, Jenny
    TRIALS, 2014, 15