A technology of global governance or the path to gender equality? Reflections on the role of indicators and targets for girls' education

被引:5
作者
Vaughan, Rosie Peppin [1 ]
Longlands, Helen [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, UCLs Fac Educ & Soc, IOE, Educ & Int Dev, London, England
关键词
Gender; education; accountability; measurement; indicators; INTERNATIONAL-ORGANIZATIONS; ACCOUNTABILITY; KNOWLEDGE; WORLD; LOST;
D O I
10.1080/03050068.2022.2145774
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Since 2000, girls' education has been an increasingly high-profile concern in international development policy. At the same time, there has been a trend towards the greater production and reliance on quantitative data, indicators and targets in national and international education policy. Scholars have raised concerns about the rise of 'performance-based' approaches to accountability in education, and potential counterproductive effects of this for social justice and equality. However, few studies have explored how this trend plays out in practice within international organisations, particularly in relation to the heightened focus on girls' education. This paper explores the implications of the increasing reliance on quantitative measures for policy actors and draws on a set of interviews with key stakeholders working in organisations concerned with gender and education to explore their divergent understandings of accountability processes. The paper concludes by reflecting on the prospects for a transformative approach to measuring gender equality and girls' education.
引用
收藏
页码:282 / 304
页数:23
相关论文
共 64 条
  • [1] Addey C., 2018, Global education policy and international development: New agendas, issues and policies, P97
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2012, GLOBAL ED INC POLICY
  • [3] Antrobus P., 2006, CARIBBEAN Q, V52, P39, DOI [10.1080/00086495.2006.11829698, DOI 10.1080/00086495.2006.11829698]
  • [4] PISA for Development: how the OECD and World Bank shaped education governance post-2015
    Auld, Euan
    Rappleye, Jeremy
    Morris, Paul
    [J]. COMPARATIVE EDUCATION, 2019, 55 (02) : 197 - 219
  • [5] The Measurement of Socio-economic Gender Inequality Revisited
    Beneria, Lourdes
    Permanyer, Inaki
    [J]. DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE, 2010, 41 (03) : 375 - 399
  • [6] Biesta GertJ. J., 2010, Good Education in an Age of Measurement: Ethics, Politics, Democracy
  • [7] The Role of PISA in Shaping Hegemonic Educational Discourses, Policies and Practices: the case of Spain
    Bonal, Xavier
    Tarabini, Aina
    [J]. RESEARCH IN COMPARATIVE AND INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION, 2013, 8 (03): : 335 - 341
  • [8] 'Operationalizing' the Capability Approach as a Basis for Equality and Human Rights Monitoring in Twenty-first-century Britain
    Burchardt, Tania
    Vizard, Polly
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HUMAN DEVELOPMENT AND CAPABILITIES, 2011, 12 (01) : 91 - 119
  • [9] Carnoy M., 2003, The new accountability: High schools and high-stakes testing
  • [10] Chetia B., 2021, Malaya Journal of Matematik, VS, P72, DOI [10.26637/MJMS2101/0014, DOI 10.26637/MJMS2101/0014]