Model-Projected Cost-Effectiveness of Adult Hearing Screening in the USA

被引:6
作者
Borre, Ethan D. [1 ,2 ]
Dubno, Judy R. [3 ]
Myers, Evan R. [4 ]
Emmett, Susan D. [5 ,6 ]
Pavon, Juliessa M. [7 ]
Francis, Howard W. [5 ]
Ogbuoji, Osondu [5 ,8 ]
Schmidler, Gillian D. Sanders [1 ,2 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Dept Populat Hlth Sci, Durham, NC USA
[2] Duke Univ, Duke Margolis Ctr Hlth Policy, Durham, NC USA
[3] Med Univ South Carolina, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[4] Duke Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Womens Community & Populat Hlth, Sch Med, Durham, NC USA
[5] Duke Univ, Dept Head & Neck Surg & Commun Sci, Sch Med, Durham, NC USA
[6] Duke Univ, Duke Global Hlth Inst, Durham, NC USA
[7] Duke Univ, Dept Med, Div Geriatr, Sch Med, Durham, NC USA
[8] Duke Global Hlth Inst, Ctr Policy Impact Global Hlth, Durham, NC USA
[9] Duke Univ, Duke Clin Res Inst, Sch Med, Durham, NC 27708 USA
关键词
Adult hearing screening; Cost-effectiveness; Decision modeling; OLDER-ADULTS; OTITIS-MEDIA; HEALTH-CARE; ECONOMIC-EVALUATION; 70-YEAR-OLD ADULTS; FOLLOW-UP; PREVALENCE; IMPAIRMENT; IMPACT; DISABILITY;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-022-07735-7
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background While 60% of older adults have hearing loss (HL), the majority have never had their hearing tested. Objective We sought to estimate long-term clinical and economic effects of alternative adult hearing screening schedules in the USA. Design Model-based cost-effectiveness analysis simulating Current Detection (CD) and linkage of persons with HL to hearing healthcare, compared to alternative screening schedules varying by age at first screen (45 to 75 years) and screening frequency (every 1 or 5 years). Simulated persons experience yearly age- and sex-specific probabilities of acquiring HL, and subsequent hearing aid uptake (0.5-8%/year) and discontinuation (13-4%). Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were estimated according to hearing level and treatment status. Costs from a health system perspective include screening ($30-120; 2020 USD), HL diagnosis ($300), and hearing aid devices ($3690 year 1, $910/subsequent year). Data sources were published estimates from NHANES and clinical trials of adult hearing screening. Participants Forty-year-old persons in US primary care across their lifetime. Intervention Alternative screening schedules that increase baseline probabilities of hearing aid uptake (base-case 1.62-fold; range 1.05-2.25-fold). Main Measures Lifetime undiscounted and discounted (3%/year) costs and QALYs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Key Results CD resulted in 1.20 average person-years of hearing aid use compared to 1.27-1.68 with the screening schedules. Lifetime total per-person undiscounted costs were $3300 for CD and ranged from $3630 for 5-yearly screening beginning at age 75 to $6490 for yearly screening beginning at age 45. In cost-effectiveness analysis, yearly screening beginning at ages 75, 65, and 55 years had ICERs of $39,100/QALY, $48,900/QALY, and $96,900/QALY, respectively. Results were most sensitive to variations in hearing aid utility benefit and screening effectiveness. Limitation Input uncertainty around screening effectiveness. Conclusions We project that yearly hearing screening beginning at age 55+ is cost-effective by US standards.
引用
收藏
页码:978 / 985
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening in Slovakia [J].
Babela, Robert ;
Orsagh, Andrej ;
Ricova, Jana ;
Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris ;
Csanadi, Marcell ;
De Koning, Harry ;
Reckova, Maria .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2022, 31 (05) :415-421
[22]   Cost-effectiveness analysis of neonatal hearing screening program in china: should universal screening be prioritized? [J].
Huang, Li-Hui ;
Zhang, Luo ;
Tobe, Ruo-Yan Gai ;
Qi, Fang-Hua ;
Sun, Long ;
Teng, Yue ;
Ke, Qing-Lin ;
Mai, Fei ;
Zhang, Xue-Feng ;
Zhang, Mei ;
Yang, Ru-Lan ;
Tu, Lin ;
Li, Hong-Hui ;
Gu, Yan-Qing ;
Xu, Sai-Nan ;
Yue, Xiao-Yan ;
Li, Xiao-Dong ;
Qi, Bei-Er ;
Cheng, Xiao-Huan ;
Tang, Wei ;
Xu, Ling-Zhong ;
Han, De-Min .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2012, 12
[23]   Screening for Melanoma in Men: a Cost-Effectiveness Analysis [J].
Adamson, Adewole S. ;
Jarmul, Jamie A. ;
Pignone, Michael P. .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2020, 35 (04) :1175-1181
[24]   Cost-effectiveness methods of newborn screening assessment [J].
Valcarcel Nazco, Cristina ;
Garcia Perez, Lidia ;
Linertova, Renata ;
Castilla, Ivan ;
Vallejo Torres, Aura ;
Ramos Goni, Juan Manuel ;
Labrador Canadas, Vicenta ;
Luz Couce, Maria ;
Espada Saenz-Torres, Mercedes ;
Dulin Iniguez, Elena ;
Posada, Manuel ;
Imaz Iglesia, Maki ;
Serrano Aguilar, Pedro .
REVISTA ESPANOLA DE SALUD PUBLICA, 2021, 95
[25]   Cost-effectiveness of secondary screening modalities for hypertension [J].
Wang, Y. Claire ;
Koval, Alisa M. ;
Nakamura, Miyabi ;
Newman, Jonathan D. ;
Schwartz, Joseph E. ;
Stone, Patricia W. .
BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2013, 18 (01) :1-7
[26]   Cost-Effectiveness Methods and Newborn Screening Assessment [J].
Castilla-Rodriguez, I. ;
Vallejo-Torres, L. ;
Couce, M. L. ;
Valcarcel-Nazco, C. ;
Mar, J. ;
Serrano-Aguilar, P. .
RARE DISEASES EPIDEMIOLOGY: UPDATE AND OVERVIEW, 2ND EDITION, 2017, 1031 :267-281
[27]   Cost-effectiveness of population screening for aortic stenosis [J].
Motazedian, Pouya ;
Prosperi-Porta, Graeme ;
Hibbert, Benjamin ;
Jalal, Hawre ;
Labinaz, Marino ;
Burwash, Ian G. ;
Abdel-Razek, Omar ;
Di Santo, Pietro ;
Simard, Trevor ;
Wells, George ;
Coyle, Doug .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-QUALITY OF CARE AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES, 2025, 11 (04) :378-387
[28]   Cost-effectiveness of adult vaccinations: A systematic review [J].
Leidner, Andrew J. ;
Murthy, Neil ;
Chesson, Harrell W. ;
Biggerstaff, Matthew ;
Stoecker, Charles ;
Harris, Aaron M. ;
Acosta, Anna ;
Dooling, Kathleen ;
Bridges, Carolyn B. .
VACCINE, 2019, 37 (02) :226-234
[29]   Cost-effectiveness of community screening for glaucoma in rural India: a decision analytical model [J].
John, D. ;
Parikh, R. .
PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 155 :142-151
[30]   The cost-effectiveness of mammography screening: Evidence from a microsimulation model for New Zealand [J].
Szeto, KL ;
Devlin, NJ .
HEALTH POLICY, 1996, 38 (02) :101-115