Corporate social responsibility and the alignment of CEO and shareholders wealth: Does a strong alignment induce or restrain CSR?

被引:15
作者
Kim, Hyeong Joon [1 ]
Mun, Seongjae [2 ]
Han, Seung Hun [3 ]
机构
[1] Korea Aerosp Univ, Sch Business, Goyang Si, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
[2] Soonchunhyang Univ, Dept Econ & Finance, 22,Soonchunhyang Ro, Asan, Chungcheongnam, South Korea
[3] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol, Sch Business & Technol Management, Daejeon, South Korea
关键词
agency problem; CEO compensation; corporate social responsibility; managerial incentive; stakeholder theory; stakeholder-oriented investment; EXECUTIVE-COMPENSATION; RISK-AVERSION; AGENCY COSTS; INCENTIVES; FIRM; IMPACT; BEHAVIOR; OPTIONS; POLICY;
D O I
10.1002/csr.2384
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We examine whether a strong alignment of the chief executive officer (CEO) and shareholders wealth induces or restrains the firm's corporate social responsibility (CSR) engagement. CSR can enhance shareholders wealth consistent with stakeholder theory. However, CEOs maximizing their own utilities have an incentive to overinvest corporate resources for CSR engagement at shareholders' expense. Therefore, the strong alignment of the CEO and shareholders wealth is expected to lead the CEO to engage less in some CSR activities, particularly those are questionable to enhance shareholders wealth or those are only good for the CEO's private benefit. Empirically, we find that firms with strongly aligned CEOs are less likely to strengthen CSR activities for external stakeholders such as the environment, community, and human rights. This suggests that strengthening CSR for external stakeholders appears to be the consequence of agency problem rather than stakeholder theory. Overall, we argue that CEO-shareholders wealth alignment has a non-monotonic impact on CSR activities, and it can effectively mitigate the agency problem by restraining overinvestment in some CSR activities that may harm shareholders wealth.
引用
收藏
页码:720 / 741
页数:22
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Risk: Theory and Empirical Evidence [J].
Albuquerque, Rui ;
Koskinen, Yrjo ;
Zhang, Chendi .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2019, 65 (10) :4451-4469
[2]   Managerial Incentives to Increase Risk Provided by Debt, Stock, and Options [J].
Anderson, Joshua D. ;
Core, John E. .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2018, 64 (09) :4408-4432
[3]   An exploratory study of the impact of degree of religiousness upon an individual's corporate social responsiveness orientation [J].
Angelidis, J ;
Ibrahim, N .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2004, 51 (02) :119-128
[4]  
Arrow K.J., 1971, Essays in the Theory of Risk-Bearing, P90
[5]   Does CSR matter in times of crisis? Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic [J].
Bae, Kee-Hong ;
El Ghoul, Sadok ;
Gong, Zhaoran ;
Guedhami, Omrane .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2021, 67
[6]   Corporate Social Responsibility as a Conflict Between Shareholders [J].
Barnea, Amir ;
Rubin, Amir .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2010, 97 (01) :71-86
[7]   Managerial contracting and corporate social responsibility [J].
Baroni, David P. .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2008, 92 (1-2) :268-288
[8]   Executive compensation as an agency problem [J].
Bebchuk, LA ;
Fried, JA .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2003, 17 (03) :71-92
[9]   How do firms achieve corporate social performance? An integrated perspective [J].
Ben-Amar, Walid ;
Francoeur, Claude ;
Marsat, Sylvain ;
Sijamic Wahid, Aida .
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 28 (03) :1078-1090
[10]   Individual and Corporate Social Responsibility [J].
Benabou, Roland ;
Tirole, Jean .
ECONOMICA, 2010, 77 (305) :1-19