How regulatory focus-mode fit impacts variety-seeking

被引:22
作者
Thuy Pham [1 ]
Mathmann, Frank [1 ]
Jin, Hyun Seung [1 ]
Higgins, E. Tory [2 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Advertising Mkt & Publ Relat, 2 George St, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia
[2] Columbia Univ, Dept Psychol, New York, NY 10027 USA
关键词
attitude certainty; choice engagement; regulatory fit; regulatory focus; regulatory mode; variety-seeking; PURCHASE QUANTITY; ATTITUDE CERTAINTY; PROMOTION PRIDE; SELF-REGULATION; NEGATIVE AFFECT; VALUE CREATION; TEXT ANALYSIS; PREVENTION; CONSUMER; DECISION;
D O I
10.1002/jcpy.1317
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Variety-seeking research has examined antecedents in terms of contextual factors and individual differences. However, it does not consider the interaction of individual difference factors such as regulatory focus (promotion vs. prevention) and regulatory mode (locomotion vs. assessment) to predict variety-seeking. Drawing on regulatory fit theory, this study introduces a new kind of regulatory fit based on the interaction between regulatory focus and mode (i.e., regulatory focus-mode fit), thereby extending previous work examining fit based on either regulatory focus or regulatory mode in isolation. Results from five studies, including field data from 10,547 music app consumers (text analysis), two preregistered studies, and two online experiments, show that regulatory focus-mode fit (vs. non-fit) decreases variety-seeking. Engagement and attitude certainty serially mediate regulatory focus-mode fit effects. Findings provide implications for consumer segmentation and message framing.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 96
页数:20
相关论文
共 114 条
  • [61] Engaging the consumer: The opposing forces of regulatory nonfit versus fit
    Lee, Angela Y.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 19 (02) : 134 - 136
  • [62] Bringing the frame into focus: The influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion
    Lee, AY
    Aaker, JL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 86 (02) : 205 - 218
  • [63] Seeking Freedom through Variety
    Levav, Jonathan
    Zhu, Rui
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2009, 36 (04) : 600 - 610
  • [64] Promotion and prevention choices between stability and change
    Liberman, N
    Idson, LC
    Camacho, CJ
    Higgins, ET
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 77 (06) : 1135 - 1145
  • [65] Using heteroscedasticity consistent standard errors in the linear regression model
    Long, JS
    Ervin, LH
    [J]. AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 2000, 54 (03) : 217 - 224
  • [66] Regulatory Focus in the Life Story: Prevention and Promotion as Expressed in Three Layers of Personality
    Manczak, Erika M.
    Zapata-Gietl, Claudia
    McAdams, Dan P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 106 (01) : 169 - 181
  • [67] CULTURE AND THE SELF - IMPLICATIONS FOR COGNITION, EMOTION, AND MOTIVATION
    MARKUS, HR
    KITAYAMA, S
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1991, 98 (02) : 224 - 253
  • [68] When Plentiful Platfoinis Pay Off: Assessment Orientation Moderates the Effect of Assortment Size on Choice Engagement and Product Valuation
    Mathmann, Frank
    Chylinski, Mathew
    de Ruyter, Ko
    Higgins, E. Tory
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RETAILING, 2017, 93 (02) : 212 - 227
  • [69] The Perfect Mix: Regulatory Complementarity and the Speed-Accuracy Balance in Group Performance
    Mauro, Romina
    Pierro, Antonio
    Mannetti, Lucia
    Higgins, E. Tory
    Kruglanski, Arie W.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2009, 20 (06) : 681 - 685
  • [70] VARIETY SEEKING BEHAVIOR - AN INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEW
    MCALISTER, L
    PESSEMIER, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1982, 9 (03) : 311 - 322