Global research hotspots and trends on robotic surgery in obstetrics and gynecology: a bibliometric analysis based on VOSviewer

被引:5
作者
Xiao, Peichen [1 ,2 ]
Li, Lu [1 ]
Qu, Jinfeng [1 ]
Wang, Guangxin [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Jinan Cent Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Jinan, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ, Jinan Cent Hosp, Innovat Ctr Intelligent Diag, Jinan, Peoples R China
[3] Shandong First Med Univ, Shandong Innovat Ctr Intelligent Diag, Cent Hosp, Jinan, Peoples R China
关键词
robotic surgery; obstetrics and gynecology; bibliometric analysis; Web of Science; VOSviewer; LYMPH-NODE BIOPSY; LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY; SACROCOLPOPEXY; OUTCOMES; CANCER; FIELD;
D O I
10.3389/fsurg.2024.1308489
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective Over the last two decades, the quantity of papers published in relation to robotic surgery in obstetrics and gynecology has continued to grow globally. However, no bibliometric analysis based on VOSviewer has been performed to evaluate the past and present of global research in the field. In this study, we aimed to analyze the bibliometric characteristics of papers on robotic surgery in obstetrics and gynecology to reveal research hotspots and trends in this field.Methods The Web of Science Core Collection was searched for scientific papers on robotic surgery in obstetrics and gynecology published between January 1, 1998 and December 31, 2023. Bibliometric metadata of each selected paper was extracted for analysis. The results were visualized by VOSviewer (version 1.6.18).Results A total of 1,430 papers met the inclusion criteria. The United States had the highest total link strengths and contributed the most papers (n = 793). The Mayo Clinic produced the largest number of papers (n = 85), and Professor Pedro T Ramirez contributed the most papers (n = 36). The number of citations ranged from 0 to 295 with a total sum of 29,103. The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology published the most relevant papers (n = 252). Keywords were classified into six clusters based on co-occurrence data, of which cluster 1, cluster 4 and cluster 6 had more main keywords with the largest average publication year.Conclusions This is the first VOSviewer-based bibliometric analysis of robotic surgery research in obstetrics and gynecology. The United States was the leading country, and the Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology was the most productive journal in the field. Scientists and institutions from around the world should push their boundaries to bring about deep collaboration. The main research topic has always been the use of robotic surgery in the treatment of gynecologic malignancies. More randomized controlled trials need to be conducted to compare surgical outcomes of robotic surgery with other surgical approaches. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse has become a new research hotspot, and robotic surgery for sentinel lymph node detection in gynecologic malignancies are more potential directions for future research.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   The role of robotic surgery in gynecology [J].
Advincula, Arnold P. ;
Song, Arleen .
CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 19 (04) :331-336
[2]   A bibliometric analysis of periodontology [J].
Ahmad, Paras ;
Slots, Jorgen .
PERIODONTOLOGY 2000, 2021, 85 (01) :237-240
[3]   The Hundred Most-Cited Publications in Orthopaedic Knee Research [J].
Ahmad, Sufian S. ;
Evangelopoulos, Dimitrios S. ;
Abbasian, M. ;
Roeder, Christoph ;
Kohl, Sandro .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2014, 96A (22)
[4]   Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials [J].
Albright, Benjamin B. ;
Witte, Tilman ;
Tofte, Alena N. ;
Chou, Jeremy ;
Black, Jonathan D. ;
Desai, Vrunda B. ;
Erekson, Elisabeth A. .
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 23 (01) :18-27
[5]  
AlRyalat Saif Aldeen, 2019, F1000Res, V8, P266, DOI 10.12688/f1000research.17979.1
[6]   Robotic Compared With Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy A Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Anger, Jennifer T. ;
Mueller, Elizabeth R. ;
Tarnay, Christopher ;
Smith, Bridget ;
Stroupe, Kevin ;
Rosenman, Amy ;
Brubaker, Linda ;
Bresee, Catherine ;
Kenton, Kimberly .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 123 (01) :5-12
[7]   Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic myomectomy [J].
Bedient, Carrie E. ;
Magrina, Javier F. ;
Noble, Brie N. ;
Kho, Rosanne M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 201 (06) :566.e1-566.e5
[8]   Open Access to the Scientific Journal Literature: Situation 2009 [J].
Bjork, Bo-Christer ;
Welling, Patrik ;
Laakso, Mikael ;
Majlender, Peter ;
Hedlund, Turid ;
Guonason, Guoni .
PLOS ONE, 2010, 5 (06)
[9]   A case-control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy [J].
Boggess, John F. ;
Gehrig, Paola A. ;
Cantrell, Leigh ;
Shafer, Aaron ;
Ridgway, Mildred ;
Skinner, Elizabeth N. ;
Fowler, Wesley C. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 199 (04) :357.e1-357.e7
[10]   Bibliometric Indicators: Quality Measurements of Scientific Publication [J].
Durieux, Valerie ;
Gevenois, Pierre Alain .
RADIOLOGY, 2010, 255 (02) :342-351