In vitro Activity of Ceftaroline Against Isolates of Gram-Positive Bacteria from Patients with Bloodstream Infections Collected as a Part of ATLAS Between 2017 and 2020

被引:1
作者
Kempf, Marie [1 ,2 ]
Arhin, Francis F. [3 ]
Kuraieva, Alona [4 ]
Utt, Eric [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Angers, Lab Bacteriol Virol, Angers, France
[2] Nantes Univ, Univ Angers, INCIT, Inserm,CHU Angers, F-49000 Angers, France
[3] Pfizer Inc, Kirkland, PQ, Canada
[4] Pfizer Inc, New York, NY USA
[5] Pfizer Inc, Gorton, CT 06340 USA
来源
INFECTION AND DRUG RESISTANCE | 2024年 / 17卷
关键词
ATLAS; bloodstream infections; ceftaroline; Gram-positive bacteria; surveillance; ENDOCARDITIS; COMPARATORS;
D O I
10.2147/IDR.S423004
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess the in vitro activity of ceftaroline and a panel of comparator agents against isolates of Gram-positive bacteria, including Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, beta-hemolytic streptococci, and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) from blood collected in Africa and Middle East (AfME), Asia Pacific (APAC), Europe, Latin America (LATAM), and North America from 2017 to 2020 as a part of the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance (ATLAS) program. Methods: Susceptibility and minimum inhibitory concentration were determined using broth microdilution for all antimicrobial agents by a central reference laboratory according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) guidelines. Results: Ceftaroline showed good activity (susceptibility 289.8%, MIC90 0.008-2 mg/L) against all Gram-positive isolates tested. All isolates of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus, penicillin-susceptible S. pneumoniae, S. agalactiae, S. dysgalactiae, and S. pyogenes were susceptible to ceftaroline (MIC90 0.008-0.25 mg/L). Ceftaroline susceptibility for MRSA isolates was 89.8% globally (MIC90 2 mg/ L). Among the comparator agents, all isolates were susceptible to vancomycin, except S. epidermis (susceptibility, 99.9%). Among other agents, daptomycin, linezolid, and tigecycline showed potent activity (susceptibility 297.9%, MIC90 0.03-2 mg/L) against all isolates tested. Conclusion: Ceftaroline showed potent in vitro activity against global bloodstream isolates of Gram-positive bacteria collected between 2017 and 2020. Monitoring and surveillance of global as well as regional longitudinal trends of resistance rates among Grampositive isolates causing bloodstream infections are important to limit the spread of AMR, establish stewardship measures, and manage and appropriately treat infections.
引用
收藏
页码:343 / 354
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparative In Vitro Activity Profile of Oritavancin against Recent Gram-Positive Clinical Isolates
    Arhin, Francis F.
    Draghi, Deborah C.
    Pillar, Chris M.
    Parr, Thomas R., Jr.
    Moeck, Gregory
    Sahm, Daniel F.
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2009, 53 (11) : 4762 - 4771
  • [22] In vitro activity of dihydrofolate reductase inhibitors and other antibiotics against Gram-positive pathogens collected globally between 2004 and 2016
    Noviello, Stephanie
    Hawser, Stephen
    Sader, Helio
    Huang, David B.
    JOURNAL OF GLOBAL ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE, 2019, 16 : 236 - 238
  • [23] Ceftobiprole activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens causing bone and joint infections in the United States from 2016 to 2020
    Duncan, Leonard R.
    Hamed, Kamal A.
    Smart, Jennifer I.
    Pfaller, Michael A.
    Flamm, Robert K.
    Mendes, Rodrigo E.
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2022, 103 (03)
  • [24] In Vitro Activity of Plazomicin against Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Bacterial Pathogens Isolated from Patients in Canadian Hospitals from 2013 to 2017 as Part of the CANWARD Surveillance Study
    Walkty, Andrew
    Karlowsky, James A.
    Baxter, Melanie R.
    Adam, Heather J.
    Zhanel, George G.
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2019, 63 (01)
  • [25] Telavancin activity in vitro tested against a worldwide collection of Gram-positive clinical isolates (2014)
    Duncan, Leonard R.
    Sader, Helio S.
    Smart, Jennifer I.
    Flamm, Robert K.
    Mendes, Rodrigo E.
    JOURNAL OF GLOBAL ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE, 2017, 10 : 271 - 276
  • [26] The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on pediatric bloodstream infections and alteration in antimicrobial resistance phenotypes in Gram-positive bacteria, 2020-2022
    Fallah, Fatemeh
    Karimi, Abdollah
    Azimi, Leila
    Ghandchi, Ghazale
    Gholinejad, Zari
    Abdollahi, Nafiseh
    Oskooie, Nazanin Ahari
    Khodaei, Hannan
    Armin, Shahnaz
    Behzad, Azita
    Hashemi, Seyedeh Masumeh
    Ahmadizadeh, Seyedeh Narjes
    Alebouyeh, Masoud
    BMC PEDIATRICS, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [27] In vitro activity of linezolid and other antibiotics against Gram-positive bacteria from the major teaching hospitals in Kuwait
    Al Sweih, N
    Mokaddas, E
    Jamal, W
    Phillips, OA
    Rotimi, VO
    JOURNAL OF CHEMOTHERAPY, 2005, 17 (06) : 607 - 613
  • [28] In Vitro Activity of Tedizolid Against Gram-Positive Bacteria in Patients With Skin and Skin Structure Infections and Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia: A Korean Multicenter Study
    Lee, Yangsoon
    Hong, Sung Kuk
    Choi, SungHak
    Weonbinlm
    Yong, Dongeun
    Lee, Kyungwon
    ANNALS OF LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2015, 35 (05) : 523 - 530
  • [29] Telavancin activity against Gram-positive bacteria isolated from respiratory tract specimens of patients with nosocomial pneumonia
    Pfaller, Michael A.
    Mendes, Rodrigo E.
    Sader, Helio S.
    Jones, Ronald N.
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2010, 65 (11) : 2396 - 2404
  • [30] Daptomycin in vitro activity tested against gram-positive strains collected from European and Latin American medical Centers in 2003
    Sader, HS
    Fritsche, TR
    Streit, JM
    Jones, RN
    JOURNAL OF CHEMOTHERAPY, 2005, 17 (05) : 477 - 483