Financing A Free-for-All: Crowdfunding Open-Source Software

被引:0
|
作者
Bort, James [1 ]
Meoli, Azzurra [2 ]
Sullivan, David W. [3 ]
机构
[1] Depaul Univ, Chicago, IL 60614 USA
[2] Univ Bologna, Bologna, Italy
[3] Univ Houston, Houston, TX USA
关键词
Open-source software; OSS; Crowdfunding; Entrepreneurship; Trust; O30; O34; O36; L26; OPEN INNOVATION; MANAGEMENT; COMMUNITY; KNOWLEDGE; PARTICIPATION; CONSEQUENCES; PERFORMANCE; INVESTMENT; CHALLENGES; RESOURCES;
D O I
10.1007/s11187-023-00867-y
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper examines whether open-source software (OSS) provides unique advantages in the entrepreneurial crowdfunding context. The economic model for new ventures with business plans centered on OSS is often counterintuitive to early-stage investors. On the one hand, the non-restrictive OSS approach reduces the barriers to widespread product adoption and collaboration; on the other, OSS is essentially a public good, creating a scenario where anyone can appropriate value from the product without compensating its creators. As such, an OSS approach can dissuade investors primarily concerned with appropriating value for themselves, making it difficult for early-stage OSS ventures to attract investors. However, the rapid rise of crowdfunding has created a communally minded investor base that might instead find OSS projects enticing. We theorize that the attributes of OSS projects align with the communal expectations of crowdfunding investors and thus create supportive environments for OSS-based ventures. We illustrate this alignment through the community-based resource mobilization framework and suggest that the OSS approach yields greater investor trust, leading to superior financing outcomes. Our mixed methods approach blends archival analyses of Kickstarter data with a constructive replication through a randomized experiment, providing consistent support that an OSS approach can be advantageous in the crowdfunding context. Can rewards-based crowdfunding open new doors to finance open-source software (OSS) projects? Our research suggests that crowdfunding backers are more likely to support OSS projects because they are perceived as more trustworthy. While the economic principles of OSS can be counterintuitive, OSS promotes widespread product adoption and collaboration. This allows anyone to benefit from OSS. Our research builds on the notion that crowdfunding, much like OSS, is a communal endeavor. We leverage data from the rewards-based crowdfunding platform Kickstarter.com and a controlled experiment, finding a connection between projects that espouse the OSS approach and crowdfunding success. The culmination of the two studies advances knowledge of the unique preferences of crowdfunding backers and suggests that the crowdfunding context is fertile ground to bring new insights into OSS-focused start-ups.
引用
收藏
页码:1449 / 1469
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Stop Word Lists in Free Open-source Software Packages
    Nothman, Joel
    Qin, Hanmin
    Yurchak, Roman
    NLP OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE (NLP-OSS), 2018, : 7 - 12
  • [22] MuscleViz: Free Open-Source Software for Muscle Weakness Visualization
    Wittenbach, Jason D.
    Cocanougher, Benjamin T.
    Yun, Pomi
    Foley, A. Reghan
    Bonnemann, Carsten G.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROMUSCULAR DISEASES, 2019, 6 (02) : 263 - 266
  • [23] MuscleViz: free open-source software for muscle weakness visualization
    Wittenbach, J.
    Cocanougher, B.
    Yun, P.
    Foley, A.
    Bonnemann, C.
    NEUROMUSCULAR DISORDERS, 2019, 29 : S114 - S114
  • [24] An Overview of Open-Source Software Licenses and the Value of Open-Source Software to Public Health Initiatives
    Hahn, Erin N.
    JOHNS HOPKINS APL TECHNICAL DIGEST, 2014, 32 (04): : 690 - 698
  • [25] Free-for-all
    Holmes, B
    NEW SCIENTIST, 1998, 159 (2140) : 17 - 17
  • [26] LAND OF THE FREE-FOR-ALL
    COCKBURN, A
    NEW STATESMAN & SOCIETY, 1993, 6 (279): : 38 - 38
  • [27] Reusing open-source software and practices: The impact of open-source on commercial vendors
    Brown, AW
    Booch, G
    SOFTWARE REUSE: METHODS, TECHNIQUES, AND TOOLS, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, 2319 : 123 - 136
  • [28] Free for all, or free-for-all? A content analysis of Australian university open access policies
    Wakeling, Simon
    Kingsley, Danny
    Jamali, Hamid R.
    Kennan, Mary Anne
    Sarrafzadeh, Maryam
    INFORMATION RESEARCH-AN INTERNATIONAL ELECTRONIC JOURNAL, 2022, 27 (02):
  • [29] FloodRisk: a collaborative, free and open-source software for flood risk analysis
    Albano, Raffaele
    Mancusi, Leonardo
    Sole, Aurelia
    Adamowski, Jan
    GEOMATICS NATURAL HAZARDS & RISK, 2017, 8 (02) : 1812 - 1832
  • [30] PTCLab: Free and open-source software for calculating phase transformation crystallography
    Gu, X.-F. (xinfugu@gmail.com), 1600, International Union of Crystallography, 5 Abbey Road, Chester, CH1 2HU, United Kingdom (49):