Public acceptance in direct potable water reuse: a call for incorporating responsible research and innovation

被引:2
作者
Moesker, Karen [1 ,2 ]
Pesch, Udo [1 ]
Doorn, Neelke [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Dept Values Technol & Innovat, Delft, Netherlands
[2] Delft Univ Technol, Dept Values Technol & Innovat, Jaffalaan 5, NL-2628 BX Delft, Netherlands
关键词
Direct potable reuse; responsible research and innovation; public acceptance; information deficit model; public participation; RECYCLED WATER; WASTE-WATER; FRAMEWORK; TECHNOLOGIES; PERSPECTIVE; US;
D O I
10.1080/23299460.2024.2304382
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
As global issues such as climate change and diminishing resources become increasingly pressing, water recycling has moved into the focus. However, the successful implementation of Direct Potable Water Reuse (DPR) projects hinges on securing public acceptance, which remains challenging. This paper aims to flesh out possible reasons for the lingering public rejection of DPR. We will do so by conducting a literature review on how public acceptance is understood and what approaches are proposed to enhance it. These approaches are analyzed using Responsible Research and Innovation principles and the `opening up', `closing down' and `leaving ajar' approaches. Our research identifies an overreliance on the controversial information deficit model, closing down large parts of public engagement. We advocate for becoming more inclusive through the `leaving ajar' approach. Particularly, attention should be paid to reflexivity and responsiveness to public concerns to ensure meaningful public engagement.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [21] Of Dreamliners and Drinking Water: Developing Risk Regulation and a Safety Culture for Direct Potable Reuse
    Binz, Christian
    Razavian, Noosha Bronte
    Kiparsky, Michael
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2018, 32 (02) : 511 - 525
  • [22] Of Dreamliners and Drinking Water: Developing Risk Regulation and a Safety Culture for Direct Potable Reuse
    Christian Binz
    Noosha Bronte Razavian
    Michael Kiparsky
    Water Resources Management, 2018, 32 : 511 - 525
  • [23] The costs of direct and indirect potable water reuse in a medium-sized arid inland community
    Herman, Jason G.
    Scruggs, Caroline E.
    Thomson, Bruce M.
    JOURNAL OF WATER PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2017, 19 : 239 - 247
  • [24] Drivers of Microbial Risk for Direct Potable Reuse and de Facto Reuse Treatment Schemes: The Impacts of Source Water Quality and Blending
    Chaudhry, Rabia M.
    Hamilton, Kerry A.
    Haas, Charles N.
    Nelson, Kara L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 14 (06)
  • [25] Analysis on the Knowledge Evolution Path of Public Acceptance of Reclaimed Water Research
    Liu, Xiaojun
    Li, Lili
    Wang, Mengmeng
    WATER, 2022, 14 (15)
  • [26] Public Acceptance of Water Reuse for Agriculture in the Wake of the New EU Regulation: Early Reflections
    Suman, Anna Berti
    Toscano, Attilio
    JOURNAL FOR EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENTAL & PLANNING LAW, 2021, 18 (03) : 225 - 255
  • [27] Socio-technical transitions in water scarcity contexts: Public acceptance of greywater reuse technologies in the Metropolitan Area of Barcelona
    Domenech, Laia
    Sauri, David
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2010, 55 (01) : 53 - 62
  • [28] The Water Microbiome Through a Pilot Scale Advanced Treatment Facility for Direct Potable Reuse (vol 10, 993, 2019)
    Kantor, R. S.
    Miller, S. E.
    Nelson, K. L.
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2019, 10
  • [29] Responsible Research and Innovation: the concept and its implementation in the areas of public engagement, gender equality and ethics
    Dankowska, Alicja
    E-MENTOR, 2021, (02): : 25 - 33
  • [30] Pilot testing of direct and indirect potable water reuse using multi- stage ozone-biofiltration without reverse osmosis
    Hooper, Jennifer
    Funk, Denise
    Bell, Kati
    Noibi, Morayo
    Vickstrom, Kyle
    Schulz, Chris
    Machek, Eddie
    Huang, Ching-Hua
    WATER RESEARCH, 2020, 169