共 26 条
Decision-making in nursing research and practice-Application of the Cognitive Continuum Theory: A meta-aggregative systematic review
被引:2
|作者:
O'Connor, Tricia
[1
,2
,9
]
Gibson, Jo
[1
]
Lewis, Joanne
[3
]
Strickland, Karen
[1
,4
,5
]
Paterson, Catherine
[1
,6
,7
,8
]
机构:
[1] Univ Canberra, Sch Nursing Midwifery & Publ Hlth, Canberra, Australia
[2] North Canberra Hosp, Clare Holland House, Canberra, Australia
[3] Avondale Univ, Sch Nursing & Hlth, Wahroonga, NSW, Australia
[4] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Perth, WA, Australia
[5] Auckland Univ Technol, Fac Hlth & Environm Sci, Sch Clin Sci, Auckland, New Zealand
[6] Robert Gordon Univ, Aberdeen, Scotland
[7] Flinders Univ S Australia, Caring Futures Inst, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[8] Cent Adelaide Hlth Network, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[9] Univ Canberra, Fac Hlth, Sch Nursing Midwifery & Publ Hlth, Canberra 2617, Australia
关键词:
cognitive continuum theory;
meta-aggregative systematic review;
nurse decision-making;
nursing informatics;
nursing theory;
patient outcomes;
patient-centric approach;
qualitative research;
quantum typology;
revised theory;
CLINICAL JUDGMENT;
DOCUMENTATION;
KNOWLEDGE;
NURSES;
D O I:
10.1111/jocn.16893
中图分类号:
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号:
1011 ;
摘要:
AimTo explore how the Cognitive Continuum Theory has been used in qualitative nursing research and to what extent it has been integrated in the research process using the Qualitative Network for Theory Use and Methodology (QUANTUM).BackgroundTheory, research and nursing are intrinsically linked, as are decision-making and nursing practice. With increasing pressure on nurses to improve patient outcomes, systematic knowledge regarding decision-making is critical and urgent.DesignA meta-aggregative systematic review.DatabasesCINAHL, Medline, PsycINFO, Embase and PubMed were searched from inception until May 2022 for peer-reviewed research published in English.Seven studies were included and assessed for methodological quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for qualitative research. A meta-aggregative synthesis was conducted using Joanna Briggs methodology. The QUANTUM typology was used to evaluate the visibility of the Cognitive Continuum Theory in the research process.DatabasesCINAHL, Medline, PsycINFO, Embase and PubMed were searched from inception until May 2022 for peer-reviewed research published in English.Seven studies were included and assessed for methodological quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for qualitative research. A meta-aggregative synthesis was conducted using Joanna Briggs methodology. The QUANTUM typology was used to evaluate the visibility of the Cognitive Continuum Theory in the research process.ResultsThe review identified five synthesised findings, namely: 1. the decision-making capacity of the individual nurse, 2. nurses' level of experience, 3. availability of decision support tools, 4. the availability of resources and 5. access to senior staff and peers. Only two of seven studies rigorously applied the theory. The included studies were mainly descriptive-exploratory in nature.ConclusionThe transferability of the Cognitive Continuum Theory was demonstrated; however, evolution or critique was absent. A gap in the provision of a patient-centric approach to decision-making was identified. Education, support and research is needed to assist decision-making.A new Person-Centred Nursing Model of the Cognitive Continuum Theory has been proposed to guide future research in clinical decision-making.ConclusionThe transferability of the Cognitive Continuum Theory was demonstrated; however, evolution or critique was absent. A gap in the provision of a patient-centric approach to decision-making was identified. Education, support and research is needed to assist decision-making.A new Person-Centred Nursing Model of the Cognitive Continuum Theory has been proposed to guide future research in clinical decision-making.Relevance to Clinical PracticeNurses make numerous decisions every day that directly impact patient care, therefore development and testing of new theories, modification and revision of older theories to reflect advances in knowledge and technology in contemporary health care are essential.
引用
收藏
页码:7979 / 7995
页数:17
相关论文