Decision-making in nursing research and practice-Application of the Cognitive Continuum Theory: A meta-aggregative systematic review

被引:2
|
作者
O'Connor, Tricia [1 ,2 ,9 ]
Gibson, Jo [1 ]
Lewis, Joanne [3 ]
Strickland, Karen [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Paterson, Catherine [1 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Canberra, Sch Nursing Midwifery & Publ Hlth, Canberra, Australia
[2] North Canberra Hosp, Clare Holland House, Canberra, Australia
[3] Avondale Univ, Sch Nursing & Hlth, Wahroonga, NSW, Australia
[4] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Perth, WA, Australia
[5] Auckland Univ Technol, Fac Hlth & Environm Sci, Sch Clin Sci, Auckland, New Zealand
[6] Robert Gordon Univ, Aberdeen, Scotland
[7] Flinders Univ S Australia, Caring Futures Inst, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[8] Cent Adelaide Hlth Network, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[9] Univ Canberra, Fac Hlth, Sch Nursing Midwifery & Publ Hlth, Canberra 2617, Australia
关键词
cognitive continuum theory; meta-aggregative systematic review; nurse decision-making; nursing informatics; nursing theory; patient outcomes; patient-centric approach; qualitative research; quantum typology; revised theory; CLINICAL JUDGMENT; DOCUMENTATION; KNOWLEDGE; NURSES;
D O I
10.1111/jocn.16893
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
AimTo explore how the Cognitive Continuum Theory has been used in qualitative nursing research and to what extent it has been integrated in the research process using the Qualitative Network for Theory Use and Methodology (QUANTUM).BackgroundTheory, research and nursing are intrinsically linked, as are decision-making and nursing practice. With increasing pressure on nurses to improve patient outcomes, systematic knowledge regarding decision-making is critical and urgent.DesignA meta-aggregative systematic review.DatabasesCINAHL, Medline, PsycINFO, Embase and PubMed were searched from inception until May 2022 for peer-reviewed research published in English.Seven studies were included and assessed for methodological quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for qualitative research. A meta-aggregative synthesis was conducted using Joanna Briggs methodology. The QUANTUM typology was used to evaluate the visibility of the Cognitive Continuum Theory in the research process.DatabasesCINAHL, Medline, PsycINFO, Embase and PubMed were searched from inception until May 2022 for peer-reviewed research published in English.Seven studies were included and assessed for methodological quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for qualitative research. A meta-aggregative synthesis was conducted using Joanna Briggs methodology. The QUANTUM typology was used to evaluate the visibility of the Cognitive Continuum Theory in the research process.ResultsThe review identified five synthesised findings, namely: 1. the decision-making capacity of the individual nurse, 2. nurses' level of experience, 3. availability of decision support tools, 4. the availability of resources and 5. access to senior staff and peers. Only two of seven studies rigorously applied the theory. The included studies were mainly descriptive-exploratory in nature.ConclusionThe transferability of the Cognitive Continuum Theory was demonstrated; however, evolution or critique was absent. A gap in the provision of a patient-centric approach to decision-making was identified. Education, support and research is needed to assist decision-making.A new Person-Centred Nursing Model of the Cognitive Continuum Theory has been proposed to guide future research in clinical decision-making.ConclusionThe transferability of the Cognitive Continuum Theory was demonstrated; however, evolution or critique was absent. A gap in the provision of a patient-centric approach to decision-making was identified. Education, support and research is needed to assist decision-making.A new Person-Centred Nursing Model of the Cognitive Continuum Theory has been proposed to guide future research in clinical decision-making.Relevance to Clinical PracticeNurses make numerous decisions every day that directly impact patient care, therefore development and testing of new theories, modification and revision of older theories to reflect advances in knowledge and technology in contemporary health care are essential.
引用
收藏
页码:7979 / 7995
页数:17
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Decision-making in nursing practice: An integrative literature review
    Nibbelink, Christine W.
    Brewer, Barbara B.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2018, 27 (5-6) : 917 - 928
  • [2] Expanding the scope of decision-making research for nursing and midwifery practice
    Cioffi, Jane
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2012, 49 (04) : 481 - 489
  • [3] The Effect of Decision Training, from a Cognitive Perspective, on Decision-Making in Volleyball: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Conejero Suarez, Manuel
    Prado Serenini, Antonio Luiz
    Fernandez-Echeverria, Carmen
    Collado-Mateo, Daniel
    Moreno Arroyo, M. Perla
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (10)
  • [4] Handheld Computer Devices to Support Clinical Decision-making in Acute Nursing Practice: Systematic Scoping Review
    Glanville, David
    Hutchinson, Anastasia
    Khaw, Damien
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2023, 25
  • [5] Fuzzy cognitive mapping in participatory research and decision making: a practice review
    Sarmiento, Ivan
    Cockcroft, Anne
    Dion, Anna
    Belaid, Loubna
    Silver, Hilah
    Pizarro, Katherine
    Pimentel, Juan
    Tratt, Elyse
    Skerritt, Lashanda
    Ghadirian, Mona Z.
    Gagnon-Dufresne, Marie-Catherine
    Andersson, Neil
    ARCHIVES OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 82 (01)
  • [6] Clinical decision-making and the nursing process in digital health systems: An integrated systematic review
    Hants, Laura
    Bail, Kasia
    Paterson, Catherine
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2023, 32 (19-20) : 7010 - 7035
  • [7] The use of cognitive continuum theory and patient scenarios to explore nurse prescribers' pharmacological knowledge and decision-making
    Offredy, Maxine
    Kendall, Sally
    Goodman, Claire
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2008, 45 (06) : 855 - 868
  • [8] Barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making in hospitals from policy to practice: a systematic review
    Waddell, Alex
    Lennox, Alyse
    Spassova, Gerri
    Bragge, Peter
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2021, 16 (01)
  • [9] The validity and reliability of clinical judgement and decision-making skills assessment in nursing: A systematic literature review
    Clemett, Victoria J.
    Raleigh, Mary
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2021, 102
  • [10] Application of the teaching games for understanding model to improve decision-making in sport learning: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gonzalez-Valero, Gabriel
    Ubago-Jimenez, Jose Luis
    Melguizo-Ibanez, Eduardo
    Fernandez-Garcia, Ruben
    BMC PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 12 (01)