Organic and Slow-Release Fertilizer Substitution Strategies Improved the Sustainability of Pineapple Production Systems in the Tropics

被引:2
|
作者
Cai, Jinwen [1 ]
Cheng, Wenxiao [1 ]
Liang, Zhenghao [1 ,2 ]
Li, Changzhen [1 ]
Deng, Yan [2 ]
Yin, Tao [3 ]
Li, Changjiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Hainan Univ, Coll Trop Crops, Hainan Key Lab Sustainable Utilizat Trop Bioresour, Haikou 570228, Peoples R China
[2] Southwest Univ, Coll Resources & Environm, Chongqing 400716, Peoples R China
[3] Hainan Tian Di Ren Ecol Agr Inc Co, Haikou 570228, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
fruit yield; nitrogen use efficiency; ammonia volatilization; nitrogen leaching; greenhouse gas emissions; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; NITROGEN USE EFFICIENCY; N MANAGEMENT; RICE SYSTEMS; PADDY FIELDS; CARBON; FOOTPRINT; MANURE; CHINA; MITIGATION;
D O I
10.3390/su151310353
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The partial substitution of chemical nitrogen fertilizers with organic fertilizer and slow-release fertilizer could improve pineapple yield and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and decrease greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, the effect of organic and slow-release fertilizer substitution strategies on the carbon footprint (CF), nitrogen footprint (NF) and net ecosystem economic benefits (NEEB) from pineapple fields in the tropics remains largely unclear. Therefore, we conducted a long-term pineapple field trial (2017-2021) for the first time with five fertilization strategies (CK: no fertilizer; F: conventional fertilization(nitrogen (N) 817 kg ha(-1), phosphorus pentoxide (P2O5) 336 kg ha(-1), potassium oxide (K2O) 945 kg ha(-1)); RF: reduction of 41.7% N, 72.0% P2O5 and 33.1% K2O on an F basis; RFO: replacement of 20% N input with organic fertilizer on an RF basis; RFOS: replacement of 15% N input with slow-release fertilizer on an RFO basis) to identify the pineapple fruit yield, NUE, CF, NF and NEEB in the tropics. The results showed that in comparison to the F treatment, the RF, RFO and RFOS treatments improved pineapple yield (7.6%, 12.4% and 26.3%, respectively), NUE (66.4%, 75.5% and 87.7%, respectively, p < 0.05) and partial factor productivity of nitrogen (PFPN) fertilizer (84.8%, 92.8% and 116.7%, respectively, p < 0.05). Additionally, of all the treatments, the RFOS treatment had the highest yield (87.8 t ha(-1)). N leaching (50.1-69.1%) and ammonia volatilization (21.6-26.2%) were the two primary routes for reactive nitrogen (Nr) loss. The field soils (36.8-45.7%) and N fertilizer production and transportation (21.2-29.5%) dominated the GHG emissions. Compared to the F treatment, the RF, RFO and RFOS treatments showed decreases in Nr losses, NF, GHG emissions and CF of 36.6-41.1%, 43.3-51.9%, 19.0-29.1% and 24.5-41.7%, respectively. Of all the treatments, the RFOS treatment had the lowest CF (191.8 kg CO(2)eq ha(-1) season) and NF (1.9 kg N t(-1) season). Additionally, the NEEB of the RF, RFO and RFOS treatments improved by 13.0-39.9% over that of the F treatment. The RFOS treatment (54,880 USD ha(-1)) resulted in the highest NEEB of all treatments. Therefore, the substitution of conventional inorganic fertilizers with organic and slow-release fertilizers is an effective method for achieving sustainable pineapple production. However, a process for further reducing GHG emissions from farmland soils and Nr losses from organic fertilizer addition still need attention in terms of pineapple production.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [31] PHOSPHATES AND AMMONIA RECOVERY FROM SECONDARY EFFLUENTS BY SELECTIVE ION-EXCHANGE WITH PRODUCTION OF A SLOW-RELEASE FERTILIZER
    LIBERTI, L
    BOARI, G
    PASSINO, R
    WATER RESEARCH, 1979, 13 (01) : 65 - 73
  • [32] Influence of a Novel Superabsorbent Slow-release Fertilizer and Water Deficit on Herbage Biomass and Oil Production of Thymus daenensis
    Abedi-Koupai, Jahangir
    Baki, Mina
    Amiri, Mohammad Javad
    JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL PLANTS AND BY-PRODUCTS-JMPB, 2024, 13 (04): : 1062 - 1071
  • [33] The use of microalgae as a high-value organic slow-release fertilizer results in tomatoes with increased carotenoid and sugar levels
    Coppens, Joeri
    Grunert, Oliver
    Van den Hende, Sofie
    Vanhoutte, Ilse
    Boon, Nico
    Haesaert, Geert
    De Gelder, Leen
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYCOLOGY, 2016, 28 (04) : 2367 - 2377
  • [34] The use of microalgae as a high-value organic slow-release fertilizer results in tomatoes with increased carotenoid and sugar levels
    Joeri Coppens
    Oliver Grunert
    Sofie Van Den Hende
    Ilse Vanhoutte
    Nico Boon
    Geert Haesaert
    Leen De Gelder
    Journal of Applied Phycology, 2016, 28 : 2367 - 2377
  • [35] Optimizing Slow-Release Fertilizer Rate for Crop and Soil Productivity in Kimchi Cabbage Cropping Systems in the Highlands of Gangwon Province
    Brempong, Mavis Badu
    Kim, Yangmin X.
    Bak, Gye-Ryeong
    Lee, Jeong-Tae
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2024, 14 (07):
  • [36] Calcium Chelation of Lignin from Pulping Spent Liquor for Water-Resistant Slow-Release Urea Fertilizer Systems
    Sipponen, Mika Henrikki
    Rojas, Orlando J.
    Pihlajaniemi, Ville
    Lintinen, Kalle
    Osterberg, Monika
    ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2017, 5 (01): : 1054 - 1061
  • [38] Reutilization recovered nutrients from wastewater by synthesizing eco-friendly slow-release hydrogel fertilizer for sustainable vegetable production
    Hu, Hao
    Li, Peng
    Tong, Yen Wah
    Li, Jun
    He, Yiliang
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2024, 499
  • [39] Long-Term Fertilizer Optimization with Slow-Release and Organic Fertilizers Improves N Use Efficiency and Soil Bacterial Populations in Paddies
    Hou, Pengfu
    Shi, Chao
    Xu, Tingting
    Xue, Lixiang
    Wang, Jing
    Liu, Qiang
    Xue, Lihong
    Yang, Linzhang
    JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT NUTRITION, 2023, 23 (04) : 6088 - 6100
  • [40] Long-Term Fertilizer Optimization with Slow-Release and Organic Fertilizers Improves N Use Efficiency and Soil Bacterial Populations in Paddies
    Pengfu Hou
    Chao Shi
    Tingting Xu
    Lixiang Xue
    Jing Wang
    Qiang Liu
    Lihong Xue
    Linzhang Yang
    Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 2023, 23 : 6088 - 6100