Organic and Slow-Release Fertilizer Substitution Strategies Improved the Sustainability of Pineapple Production Systems in the Tropics

被引:2
|
作者
Cai, Jinwen [1 ]
Cheng, Wenxiao [1 ]
Liang, Zhenghao [1 ,2 ]
Li, Changzhen [1 ]
Deng, Yan [2 ]
Yin, Tao [3 ]
Li, Changjiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Hainan Univ, Coll Trop Crops, Hainan Key Lab Sustainable Utilizat Trop Bioresour, Haikou 570228, Peoples R China
[2] Southwest Univ, Coll Resources & Environm, Chongqing 400716, Peoples R China
[3] Hainan Tian Di Ren Ecol Agr Inc Co, Haikou 570228, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
fruit yield; nitrogen use efficiency; ammonia volatilization; nitrogen leaching; greenhouse gas emissions; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; NITROGEN USE EFFICIENCY; N MANAGEMENT; RICE SYSTEMS; PADDY FIELDS; CARBON; FOOTPRINT; MANURE; CHINA; MITIGATION;
D O I
10.3390/su151310353
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The partial substitution of chemical nitrogen fertilizers with organic fertilizer and slow-release fertilizer could improve pineapple yield and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and decrease greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, the effect of organic and slow-release fertilizer substitution strategies on the carbon footprint (CF), nitrogen footprint (NF) and net ecosystem economic benefits (NEEB) from pineapple fields in the tropics remains largely unclear. Therefore, we conducted a long-term pineapple field trial (2017-2021) for the first time with five fertilization strategies (CK: no fertilizer; F: conventional fertilization(nitrogen (N) 817 kg ha(-1), phosphorus pentoxide (P2O5) 336 kg ha(-1), potassium oxide (K2O) 945 kg ha(-1)); RF: reduction of 41.7% N, 72.0% P2O5 and 33.1% K2O on an F basis; RFO: replacement of 20% N input with organic fertilizer on an RF basis; RFOS: replacement of 15% N input with slow-release fertilizer on an RFO basis) to identify the pineapple fruit yield, NUE, CF, NF and NEEB in the tropics. The results showed that in comparison to the F treatment, the RF, RFO and RFOS treatments improved pineapple yield (7.6%, 12.4% and 26.3%, respectively), NUE (66.4%, 75.5% and 87.7%, respectively, p < 0.05) and partial factor productivity of nitrogen (PFPN) fertilizer (84.8%, 92.8% and 116.7%, respectively, p < 0.05). Additionally, of all the treatments, the RFOS treatment had the highest yield (87.8 t ha(-1)). N leaching (50.1-69.1%) and ammonia volatilization (21.6-26.2%) were the two primary routes for reactive nitrogen (Nr) loss. The field soils (36.8-45.7%) and N fertilizer production and transportation (21.2-29.5%) dominated the GHG emissions. Compared to the F treatment, the RF, RFO and RFOS treatments showed decreases in Nr losses, NF, GHG emissions and CF of 36.6-41.1%, 43.3-51.9%, 19.0-29.1% and 24.5-41.7%, respectively. Of all the treatments, the RFOS treatment had the lowest CF (191.8 kg CO(2)eq ha(-1) season) and NF (1.9 kg N t(-1) season). Additionally, the NEEB of the RF, RFO and RFOS treatments improved by 13.0-39.9% over that of the F treatment. The RFOS treatment (54,880 USD ha(-1)) resulted in the highest NEEB of all treatments. Therefore, the substitution of conventional inorganic fertilizers with organic and slow-release fertilizers is an effective method for achieving sustainable pineapple production. However, a process for further reducing GHG emissions from farmland soils and Nr losses from organic fertilizer addition still need attention in terms of pineapple production.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Partial substitution of chemical fertilizer with organic fertilizer and slow-release fertilizer benefits soil microbial diversity and pineapple fruit yield in the tropics
    Jin, Xin
    Cai, Jinwen
    Yang, Shuyun
    Li, Shoupeng
    Shao, Xujie
    Fu, Chunmin
    Li, Changzhen
    Deng, Yan
    Huang, Jiaquan
    Ruan, Yunze
    Li, Changjiang
    APPLIED SOIL ECOLOGY, 2023, 189
  • [2] A review on slow-release fertilizer: Nutrient release mechanism and agricultural sustainability
    Priya, E.
    Sarkar, Sudipta
    Maji, Pradip K.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 12 (04):
  • [3] Multifunctional Slow-Release Organic-Inorganic Compound Fertilizer
    Ni, Boli
    Liu, Mingzhu
    Lue, Shaoyu
    Xie, Lihua
    Wang, Yanfang
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2010, 58 (23) : 12373 - 12378
  • [4] Environment and slow-release fertilizer in the production of Euterpe precatoria seedlings
    de Almeida, Ueliton Oliveira
    Andrade Neto, Romeu de Carvalho
    Pereira Lunz, Aureny Maria
    Nogueira, Sonia Regina
    da Costa, David Aquino
    de Araujo, James Maciel
    PESQUISA AGROPECUARIA TROPICAL, 2018, 48 (04): : 382 - 389
  • [5] Quantification of slow-release fertilizer on year-round forage production
    Han, Kun-Jun
    Pitman, William D.
    Alison, Wink M.
    Twidwell, Edward K.
    Guidry, Kurt M.
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2022, 114 (06) : 3306 - 3316
  • [6] Use of slow-release fertilizer on the production of sweet potatoes plantlets in tray
    Ros, Amarilis Beraldo
    de Araujo, Humberto Sampaio
    Narita, Nobuyoshi
    SEMINA-CIENCIAS AGRARIAS, 2013, 34 (06): : 2667 - 2674
  • [7] Slow-release nitrogen fertilizer in carrot production on Prince Edward Island
    Sanderson, K. R.
    Fillmore, S. A. E.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 2012, 92 (06) : 1223 - 1228
  • [8] Effect of organic amendments and slow-release nitrogen fertilizer on willow biomass production and soil chemical characteristics
    Adegbidi, HG
    Briggs, RD
    Volk, TA
    White, EH
    Abrahamson, LP
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2003, 25 (04): : 389 - 398
  • [9] Spherical cocrystal as a fertilizer slow-release platform for improved nitrogen cycle management
    Cao, Yuechao
    Qu, Haibin
    Wan, Xuxing
    Guo, Shengzheng
    Li, Kangli
    Wu, Songgu
    Gong, Junbo
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2025, 506
  • [10] Enhanced retention and clean dewatering of nutrients in a slow-release organic silicon fertilizer
    Griffiths, Gareth
    Czachor, Michal M.
    Dimond, Jac
    Laycock, Christian J.
    Guwy, Alan J.
    CELL REPORTS PHYSICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 5 (02):