Preliminary evaluation of computer-assisted home training for French cochlear implant recipients

被引:3
|
作者
Kerneis, Sandrine [1 ]
Galvin III, John J. [1 ,2 ]
Borel, Stephanie [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Baque, Jean [1 ]
Fu, Qian-Jie [5 ]
Bakhos, David [1 ,2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Ctr Tours, Tours, France
[2] House Inst Fdn, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Pitie Salpetriere, AP HP, Tours, France
[4] Sorbonne Univ, FRA, Tours, France
[5] UCLA, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Head & Neck Surg, Los Angeles, CA USA
[6] Univ Francois Rabelais Tours, INSERM UMR I Brain 1253, CHRU Tours, FRA, Tours, France
来源
PLOS ONE | 2023年 / 18卷 / 04期
关键词
SPEECH RECOGNITION; BINAURAL BENEFIT; NOISE; PERFORMANCE; HEARING; ADAPTATION; PERCEPTION; USERS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0285154
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
For French cochlear implant (CI) recipients, in-person clinical auditory rehabilitation is typically provided during the first few years post-implantation. However, this is often inconvenient, it requires substantial time resources and can be problematic when appointments are unavailable. In response, we developed a computer-based home training software ("French AngelSound((TM))") for French CI recipients. We recently conducted a pilot study to evaluate the newly developed French AngelSound((TM)) in 15 CI recipients (5 unilateral, 5 bilateral, 5 bimodal). Outcome measures included phoneme recognition in quiet and sentence recognition in noise. Unilateral CI users were tested with the CI alone. Bilateral CI users were tested with each CI ear alone to determine the poorer ear to be trained, as well as with both ears (binaural performance). Bimodal CI users were tested with the CI ear alone, and with the contralateral hearing aid (binaural performance). Participants trained at home over a one-month period (10 hours total). Phonemic contrast training was used; the level of difficulty ranged from phoneme discrimination in quiet to phoneme identification in multi-talker babble. Unilateral and bimodal CI users trained with the CI alone; bilateral CI users trained with the poorer ear alone. Outcomes were measured before training (pre-training), immediately after training was completed (post-training), and one month after training was stopped (follow-up). For all participants, post-training CI-only vowel and consonant recognition scores significantly improved after phoneme training with the CI ear alone. For bilateral and bimodal CI users, binaural vowel and consonant recognition scores also significantly improved after training with a single CI ear. Follow-up measures showed that training benefits were largely retained. These preliminary data suggest that the phonemic contrast training in French AngelSound((TM)) may significantly benefit French CI recipients and may complement clinical auditory rehabilitation, especially when in-person visits are not possible.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Auditory Cognitive Training for Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients
    Mishra, Srikanta K.
    Boddupally, Shiva P.
    EAR AND HEARING, 2018, 39 (01): : 48 - 59
  • [2] Computer-based Auditory Training by New Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients Is Associated With Durable Improvements in Cochlear Implant Quality of Life
    Dornhoffer, James R.
    Shannon, Christian
    Schvartz-Leyzac, Kara C.
    Dubno, Judy R.
    McRackan, Theodore R.
    EAR AND HEARING, 2024, 45 (04): : 905 - 914
  • [3] Systematic Review of Auditory Training in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients
    Rayes, Hanin
    Al-Malky, Ghada
    Vickers, Deborah
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2019, 62 (05): : 1574 - 1593
  • [4] Evaluation of the Optimized Pitch and Language Strategy in Cochlear Implant Recipients
    Vandali, Andrew
    Dawson, Pam
    Au, Agnes
    Yu, Yanyou
    Brown, Matthew
    Goorevich, Michael
    Cowan, Robert
    EAR AND HEARING, 2019, 40 (03): : 555 - 567
  • [5] Evaluation of the American English Matrix Test with Cochlear Implant Recipients
    Potts, Lisa G.
    Olivo, Alison M.
    Reeder, Ruth M.
    Firszt, Jill B.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2024, 63 (05) : 342 - 348
  • [6] Evaluation of TIMIT Sentence List Equivalency with Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients
    King, Sarah E.
    Firszt, Jill B.
    Reeder, Ruth M.
    Holden, Laura K.
    Strube, Michael
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY, 2012, 23 (05) : 313 - 331
  • [7] Evaluation of Automatic Directional Processing with Cochlear Implant Recipients
    Potts, Lisa G.
    Jang, Soo
    Hillis, Cory L.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY, 2021, 32 (08) : 478 - 486
  • [8] Overview of Nine Computerized, Home-Based Auditory-Training Programs for Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients
    Zhang, Ming
    Miller, Aimee
    Campbell, Melanie McNutt
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY, 2014, 25 (04) : 405 - 413
  • [9] Evaluation of Speech Recognition of Cochlear Implant Recipients Using a Personal Digital Adaptive Radio Frequency System
    Wolfe, Jace
    Morais, Mila
    Schafer, Erin
    Mills, Emily
    Muelder, Hans E.
    Goldbeck, Felix
    Marquis, Francois
    John, Andrew
    Hudson, Mary
    Peters, B. Robert
    Lianos, Leslie
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY, 2013, 24 (08) : 714 - 724
  • [10] A Multicenter Clinical Evaluation of Data Logging in Cochlear Implant Recipients Using Automated Scene Classification Technologies
    Cristofari, Eliana
    Cuda, Domenico
    Martini, Alessandro
    Forli, Francesca
    Zanetti, Diego
    Di Lisi, Diego
    Marsella, Pasquale
    Marchioni, Daniele
    Vincenti, Vincenzo
    Aimoni, Claudia
    Paludetti, Gaetano
    Barezzani, Maria Grazia
    Leone, Carlo Antonio
    Quaranta, Nicola
    Bianchedi, Marco
    Presutti, Livio
    Della Volpe, Antonio
    de Zinis, Luca Oscar Redaelli
    Cantore, Italo
    Frau, Giuseppe Nicolo
    Orzan, Eva
    Galletti, Francesco
    Vitale, Silvano
    Raso, Ferdinando
    Negri, Maurizio
    Trabalzini, Franco
    Livi, Walter
    Piccioni, Lucia Oriella
    Ricci, Giampietro
    Malerba, Paolo
    AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2017, 22 (4-5) : 226 - 235