Effect of celecoxib plus standard chemotherapy on cancer prognosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:6
|
作者
Li, Liangyu [1 ]
Zhang, Yingrui [1 ]
Qin, Lizheng [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Stomatol Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial & Head & Neck Oncol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Stomatol Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial & Head & Neck Oncol, Tian Tan Xi Li 4, Beijing 100050, Peoples R China
关键词
cancer prognosis; celecoxib; chemotherapy; meta-analysis; survival; CELL LUNG-CANCER; RANDOMIZED PHASE-II; COLORECTAL-CANCER; OVARIAN-CANCER; INFLAMMATION; PLACEBO; TRIAL; EXPRESSION; SURVIVAL; IMMUNITY;
D O I
10.1111/eci.13973
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundInflammation is closely related to cancer prognosis. The effect of celecoxib, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, on the prognosis of patients with cancer remains uncertain. To assess the association between celecoxib plus standard chemotherapy and cancer prognosis, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies. MethodsPubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception until July 2022 for randomized controlled trials reporting the prognosis of patients with cancer treated with celecoxib plus standard chemotherapy. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager software version 5.4. The following search terms were used in the databases: ((((celecoxib)) AND ((((((((cancer) OR (carcinoma)) OR (sarcoma)) OR (neoplasms)) OR (tumor)) OR (tumour)) OR (tumors)) OR (tumours))) AND ((survival) OR (mortality))) AND (((Clinical Trials, Randomized) OR (Trials, Randomized Clinical)) OR (Controlled Clinical Trials, Randomized)). ResultsOverall, 13 randomized controlled trials, including 8957 patients with cancer, were included in the analysis. Compared to conventional chemotherapy alone, 1-year OS and 1-year PFS rates were not significantly improved with celecoxib adjuvant therapy (OS: p = .38; PFS: p = .65). In addition, no differences were observed between the celecoxib and placebo groups in 3-year overall (p = .98), 3-year progression-free (p = .40), 5-year overall (p = .59), or 5-year progression-free (p = .56) survival rates. An increase in the risk ratio of leukopenia (p = .02) and thrombocytopenia (p = .05) was also observed, suggesting that celecoxib promotes hematologic toxicity. No increased risk of cardiovascular (p = .96) and gastrointestinal (p = .10-.91) events was observed. ConclusionsThe addition of celecoxib to standard chemotherapy did not improve OS or PFS rates of patients with cancer. Additionally, celecoxib can increase hematologic toxicity without increasing the risk of gastrointestinal or cardiovascular reactions. Further randomized controlled trials are necessary to clarify its effects and applications.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for ovarian cancer recurrence: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cianci, Stefano
    Riemma, Gaetano
    Ronsini, Carlo
    De Franciscis, Pasquale
    Torella, Marco
    Schiattarella, Antonio
    La Verde, Marco
    Colacurci, Nicola
    GLAND SURGERY, 2020, 9 (04) : 1140 - +
  • [32] The relationship between cancer associated fibroblasts biomarkers and prognosis of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cui, Meimei
    Dong, Hao
    Duan, Wanli
    Wang, Xuejie
    Liu, Yongping
    Shi, Lihong
    Zhang, Baogang
    PEERJ, 2024, 12
  • [33] Risk Factors for Synchronous Peritoneal Metastases in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zhang, Yuanxin
    Qin, Xiusen
    Luo, Rui
    Wang, Hui
    Wang, Huaiming
    Luo, Hongzhi
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [34] The effect of adjuvant chemotherapy in resectable cholangiocarcinoma: A meta-analysis and systematic review
    Wang, Ming-Liang
    Ke, Zhang-Yan
    Yin, Shuai
    Liu, Chen-Hai
    Huang, Qiang
    HEPATOBILIARY & PANCREATIC DISEASES INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 18 (02) : 110 - 116
  • [35] Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy? A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of the options for neoadjuvant therapy for treating oesophageal cancer
    Deng, Han-Yu
    Wang, Wen-Ping
    Wang, Yun-Cang
    Hu, Wei-Peng
    Ni, Peng-Zhi
    Lin, Yi-Dan
    Chen, Long-Qi
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2017, 51 (03) : 421 - 431
  • [36] Does adjuvant chemotherapy improve the prognosis of patients after resection of pulmonary metastasis from colorectal cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Chao
    Tan, Yuen
    Xu, Huimian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2019, 34 (10) : 1661 - 1671
  • [37] Thrombocytosis predicts poor prognosis of Asian patients with colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xia, Shijun
    Wu, Wenjiang
    Yu, Linchong
    Ma, Lijuan
    Chen, Shiwei
    Wang, Hao
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (35) : E30275
  • [38] Efficacy and Safety of Ipilimumab plus Chemotherapy for Advanced Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zhang, Hongman
    Shen, Jie
    Yi, Lilan
    Zhang, Wei
    Luo, Peng
    Zhang, Jian
    JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2018, 9 (23): : 4556 - 4567
  • [39] Effect of body mass index on survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving chemotherapy plus bevacizumab: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lang, Xiaohui
    Tong, Chengliang
    Yu, Yang
    Li, Huiyan
    FRONTIERS IN NUTRITION, 2024, 11
  • [40] The association of comorbidities with administration of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colon cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Boakye, Daniel
    Nagrini, Rajini
    Ahrens, Wolfgang
    Haug, Ulrike
    Guenther, Kathrin
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 13