Effect of celecoxib plus standard chemotherapy on cancer prognosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:6
|
作者
Li, Liangyu [1 ]
Zhang, Yingrui [1 ]
Qin, Lizheng [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Stomatol Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial & Head & Neck Oncol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Stomatol Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial & Head & Neck Oncol, Tian Tan Xi Li 4, Beijing 100050, Peoples R China
关键词
cancer prognosis; celecoxib; chemotherapy; meta-analysis; survival; CELL LUNG-CANCER; RANDOMIZED PHASE-II; COLORECTAL-CANCER; OVARIAN-CANCER; INFLAMMATION; PLACEBO; TRIAL; EXPRESSION; SURVIVAL; IMMUNITY;
D O I
10.1111/eci.13973
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundInflammation is closely related to cancer prognosis. The effect of celecoxib, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, on the prognosis of patients with cancer remains uncertain. To assess the association between celecoxib plus standard chemotherapy and cancer prognosis, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies. MethodsPubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception until July 2022 for randomized controlled trials reporting the prognosis of patients with cancer treated with celecoxib plus standard chemotherapy. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager software version 5.4. The following search terms were used in the databases: ((((celecoxib)) AND ((((((((cancer) OR (carcinoma)) OR (sarcoma)) OR (neoplasms)) OR (tumor)) OR (tumour)) OR (tumors)) OR (tumours))) AND ((survival) OR (mortality))) AND (((Clinical Trials, Randomized) OR (Trials, Randomized Clinical)) OR (Controlled Clinical Trials, Randomized)). ResultsOverall, 13 randomized controlled trials, including 8957 patients with cancer, were included in the analysis. Compared to conventional chemotherapy alone, 1-year OS and 1-year PFS rates were not significantly improved with celecoxib adjuvant therapy (OS: p = .38; PFS: p = .65). In addition, no differences were observed between the celecoxib and placebo groups in 3-year overall (p = .98), 3-year progression-free (p = .40), 5-year overall (p = .59), or 5-year progression-free (p = .56) survival rates. An increase in the risk ratio of leukopenia (p = .02) and thrombocytopenia (p = .05) was also observed, suggesting that celecoxib promotes hematologic toxicity. No increased risk of cardiovascular (p = .96) and gastrointestinal (p = .10-.91) events was observed. ConclusionsThe addition of celecoxib to standard chemotherapy did not improve OS or PFS rates of patients with cancer. Additionally, celecoxib can increase hematologic toxicity without increasing the risk of gastrointestinal or cardiovascular reactions. Further randomized controlled trials are necessary to clarify its effects and applications.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Efficacy and Safety of Celecoxib in Addition to Standard Cancer Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Ye, Shi-Yu
    Li, Jia-Yi
    Li, Teng-Hui
    Song, Yong-Xi
    Sun, Jing-Xu
    Chen, Xiao-Wan
    Zhao, Jun-Hua
    Li, Yuan
    Wu, Zhong-Hua
    Gao, Peng
    Huang, Xuan-Zhang
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2022, 29 (09) : 6137 - 6153
  • [2] Frailty and prognosis in lung cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Tianzi
    Peng, Xintong
    Geng, Yan
    Song, Chen
    Zhou, Ziwen
    Huang, Yan
    BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2024, 14 (02) : 121 - 131
  • [3] Effect of celecoxib on improving depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Zhi
    Wu, Qiao
    Wang, Qing
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2022, 10 (22) : 7872 - 7882
  • [4] Serum amyloid A protein in cancer prognosis: a meta-analysis and systematic review
    Lai, Yucheng
    Li, Yuting
    Gao, Leilei
    TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2021, 10 (05) : 2255 - 2264
  • [5] The impact of anthropometric parameters on colorectal cancer prognosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jaspan, Vita
    Lin, Kevin
    Popov, Violeta
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2021, 159
  • [6] Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy for ovarian cancer A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liao, Ting
    Li, Li
    Wang, Liya
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (51) : E28376
  • [7] Chemotherapy with or without estramustine for treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Qin, Zhiqiang
    Li, Xiao
    Zhang, Jianzhong
    Tang, Jingyuan
    Han, Peng
    Xu, Zhen
    Yu, Yajie
    Yang, Chengdi
    Wang, Chengming
    Xu, Ting
    Xu, Zicheng
    Zou, Qing
    MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (39)
  • [8] Myosteatosis and prognosis in cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Aleixo, G. F. P.
    Shachar, S. S.
    Nyrop, K. A.
    Muss, H. B.
    Malpica, Luis
    Williams, G. R.
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2020, 145
  • [9] Vagal nerve activity and cancer prognosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Huang, Wen-Bo
    Lai, Heng-zhou
    Long, Jing
    Ma, Qiong
    Fu, Xi
    You, Feng-Ming
    Xiao, Chong
    BMC CANCER, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [10] Adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for MSI early gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Petrelli, Fausto
    Antista, Maria
    Marra, Francesca
    Cribiu', Fulvia Milena
    Rampulla, Valentina
    Pietrantonio, Filippo
    Dottorini, Lorenzo
    Ghidini, Michele
    Luciani, Andrea
    Zaniboni, Alberto
    Tomasello, Gianluca
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 16