Patient preferences for attributes of injected or infused preventive migraine medications: Findings from a discrete choice experiment

被引:8
|
作者
Schwedt, Todd J. [1 ]
Martin, Ashley [2 ]
Kymes, Steven [3 ,7 ]
Talon, Brian [3 ]
Lee, Xin Ying [4 ]
Cady, Roger [3 ,5 ,6 ]
Asher, Divya [3 ]
Karnik-Henry, Meghana [3 ]
Mulvihill, Emily [2 ]
Bates, Dawn [2 ]
Beusterien, Kathleen [2 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Phoenix, AZ USA
[2] Cerner Enviza, Kansas City, MO USA
[3] Lundbeck LLC, Deerfield, IL USA
[4] H Lundbeck A S, Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] RK Consults, Ozark, MO USA
[6] Missouri State Univ, Springfield, MO USA
[7] Lundbeck LLC, Hlth Econ & Outcomes Res, 6 Pkwy North, Deerfield, IL 60015 USA
来源
HEADACHE | 2023年 / 63卷 / 04期
关键词
discrete choice experiment; migraine; patient preference; preventive treatment;
D O I
10.1111/head.14476
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To assess preferences among adults with migraine for differentiating attributes of injected or infused preventive treatment options and evaluate their importance in determining a treatment choice.Background: Adults with migraine and health-care providers consider many factors when making treatment decisions. Injected or infused preventive migraine treatment options differ in several attributes, including mode of administration and dosing frequency, which may be preferentially selected or avoided by patients. Understanding a patient's preference is important for clinicians as they advise on various treatment options.Methods: A total of 604 US adults diagnosed with migraine participated in an online survey that captured information on demographics, migraine history, and treatment preferences. A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was used to evaluate participants' preferences for specific attributes of injected/infused preventive migraine therapies. The DCE data were utilized to estimate attribute importance (expressed as a percentage) and identify subgroups that had different distributions of preferences.Results: In the overall migraine population, mode of administration (28.8%), durability of effectiveness (27.0%), and speed of onset (25.5%) had the highest relative importance, whereas administration setting (9.9%) and dosing frequency (8.8%) had the lowest. Four distinct subgroups were identified: Group 1 (n = 128) preferred self-injection administration and durability of effectiveness; Group 2 (n = 189) expressed aversion to cranial injections; Group 3 (n = 158) prioritized rapid speed of onset; and Group 4 (n = 129) favored health-care provider administration and durability of effectiveness.Conclusions: Speed of onset, durability of effectiveness, and mode of administration are key moderators of treatment preference among US adults with migraine. Certain segments of the migraine population prioritize specific treatment attributes over others, with intravenous infusion not considered a barrier in three of four identified segments. Clinicians can best help their patients find the right medication if they understand which medication attributes are most and least important to them.
引用
收藏
页码:484 / 493
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Patient preferences for topical psoriasis treatments: a discrete choice experiment
    Hoelker, Suna
    Ninosu, Nadia
    Buettner, Sylvia
    Peitsch, Wiebke K.
    Schaarschmidt, Marthe-Lisa
    JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGICAL TREATMENT, 2022, 33 (05) : 2595 - 2604
  • [32] Patient preferences in obstructive sleep apnea—a discrete choice experiment
    Marcel Braun
    Sarah Dietz-Terjung
    Christian Taube
    Christoph Schoebel
    Sleep and Breathing, 2022, 26 : 1717 - 1727
  • [33] Attributes for a discrete-choice experiment on preferences of patients for oncology pharmacy consultations
    Damerval, Margaux
    Bennani, Mohammed
    Rioufol, Catherine
    Omrani, Selim
    Riboulet, Margaux
    Etienne-Selloum, Nelly
    Saint-Ghislain, Audrey
    Leenhardt, Fanny
    Schmitt, Antonin
    Simon, Nicolas
    Clairet, Anne-Laure
    Meurisse, Aurelia
    Nerich, Virginie
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2024, 32 (05)
  • [34] COPD-treating nurses' preferences for inhaler attributes - a discrete choice experiment
    Bogelund, Mette
    Hagelund, Lise
    Asmussen, Mikael Bergholdt
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2017, 33 (01) : 71 - 75
  • [35] Patient preferences for the diagnosis of coeliac disease: A discrete choice experiment
    Shiha, Mohamed G.
    Wickramasekera, Nyantara
    Raju, Suneil A.
    Penny, Hugo A.
    Sanders, David S.
    UNITED EUROPEAN GASTROENTEROLOGY JOURNAL, 2024, : 330 - 337
  • [36] Patient Preferences in Subglottic Stenosis Treatment: A Discrete Choice Experiment
    Naunheim, Matthew R.
    Naunheim, Margaret L.
    Rathi, Vinay K.
    Franco, Ramon A.
    Shrime, Mark G.
    Song, Phillip C.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2018, 158 (03) : 520 - 526
  • [37] Patient preferences and priorities for haemophilia gene therapy in the US: A discrete choice experiment
    Witkop, Michelle
    Morgan, George
    O'Hara, Jamie
    Recht, Michael
    Buckner, Tyler W.
    Nugent, Diane
    Curtis, Randall
    O'Mahony, Brian
    Skinner, Mark W.
    Mulhern, Brendan
    Cawson, Matthew
    Ali, Talaha M.
    Sawyer, Eileen K.
    Li, Nanxin
    HAEMOPHILIA, 2021, 27 (05) : 769 - 782
  • [38] Patient Preferences for Treatment Attributes in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Results From a Large Survey Across Seven European Countries Using a Discrete Choice Experiment
    Fiorino, Gionata
    Bent-Ennakhil, Nawal
    Varriale, Pasquale
    Braegger, Fiona
    Hoefkens, Eveline
    INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES, 2024, 30 (12) : 2380 - 2394
  • [39] Patient Preferences for Pain Management in Advanced Cancer: Results from a Discrete Choice Experiment
    David M. Meads
    John L. O’Dwyer
    Claire T. Hulme
    Phani Chintakayala
    Karen Vinall-Collier
    Michael I. Bennett
    The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2017, 10 : 643 - 651
  • [40] Patient preferences for atopic dermatitis treatment profiles: results from a discrete choice experiment
    Quaife, Matthew
    Mulnick, Sarah
    Clarke, Harrison
    Noonan, Kerry
    Le-Bagousse-Bego, Gaelle
    Sierka, Debra
    Haddad, El-Bdaoui
    Chovatiya, Raj
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2024, 191