Patient preferences for attributes of injected or infused preventive migraine medications: Findings from a discrete choice experiment

被引:8
|
作者
Schwedt, Todd J. [1 ]
Martin, Ashley [2 ]
Kymes, Steven [3 ,7 ]
Talon, Brian [3 ]
Lee, Xin Ying [4 ]
Cady, Roger [3 ,5 ,6 ]
Asher, Divya [3 ]
Karnik-Henry, Meghana [3 ]
Mulvihill, Emily [2 ]
Bates, Dawn [2 ]
Beusterien, Kathleen [2 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Phoenix, AZ USA
[2] Cerner Enviza, Kansas City, MO USA
[3] Lundbeck LLC, Deerfield, IL USA
[4] H Lundbeck A S, Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] RK Consults, Ozark, MO USA
[6] Missouri State Univ, Springfield, MO USA
[7] Lundbeck LLC, Hlth Econ & Outcomes Res, 6 Pkwy North, Deerfield, IL 60015 USA
来源
HEADACHE | 2023年 / 63卷 / 04期
关键词
discrete choice experiment; migraine; patient preference; preventive treatment;
D O I
10.1111/head.14476
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To assess preferences among adults with migraine for differentiating attributes of injected or infused preventive treatment options and evaluate their importance in determining a treatment choice.Background: Adults with migraine and health-care providers consider many factors when making treatment decisions. Injected or infused preventive migraine treatment options differ in several attributes, including mode of administration and dosing frequency, which may be preferentially selected or avoided by patients. Understanding a patient's preference is important for clinicians as they advise on various treatment options.Methods: A total of 604 US adults diagnosed with migraine participated in an online survey that captured information on demographics, migraine history, and treatment preferences. A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was used to evaluate participants' preferences for specific attributes of injected/infused preventive migraine therapies. The DCE data were utilized to estimate attribute importance (expressed as a percentage) and identify subgroups that had different distributions of preferences.Results: In the overall migraine population, mode of administration (28.8%), durability of effectiveness (27.0%), and speed of onset (25.5%) had the highest relative importance, whereas administration setting (9.9%) and dosing frequency (8.8%) had the lowest. Four distinct subgroups were identified: Group 1 (n = 128) preferred self-injection administration and durability of effectiveness; Group 2 (n = 189) expressed aversion to cranial injections; Group 3 (n = 158) prioritized rapid speed of onset; and Group 4 (n = 129) favored health-care provider administration and durability of effectiveness.Conclusions: Speed of onset, durability of effectiveness, and mode of administration are key moderators of treatment preference among US adults with migraine. Certain segments of the migraine population prioritize specific treatment attributes over others, with intravenous infusion not considered a barrier in three of four identified segments. Clinicians can best help their patients find the right medication if they understand which medication attributes are most and least important to them.
引用
收藏
页码:484 / 493
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient preferences for preventive migraine treatments among Canadian adults: A discrete choice experiment
    Bougie, Joanna K.
    Krupsky, Kathryn
    Beusterien, Kathleen
    Ladouceur, Marie-Pier
    Mulvihill, Emily
    HEADACHE, 2024,
  • [2] Patient preferences for preventive migraine treatments among Canadian adults: A discrete choice experiment
    Bougie, Joanna K.
    Krupsky, Kathryn
    Beusterien, Kathleen
    Ladouceur, Marie-Pier
    Mulvihill, Emily
    HEADACHE, 2025, 65 (01): : 113 - 123
  • [3] Patient Preferences for Preventive Migraine Treatments: A Discrete-Choice Experiment
    Mansfield, Carol
    Gebben, David J.
    Sutphin, Jessie
    Tepper, Stewart J.
    Schwedt, Todd J.
    Sapra, Sandhya
    Shah, Neel
    HEADACHE, 2019, 59 (05): : 715 - 726
  • [4] Patient Preferences for Medications in Managing Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Discrete Choice Experiment
    Ozdemir, Semra
    Baid, Drishti
    Verghese, Naina R.
    Lam, Amanda Y. R.
    Lee, Phong Ching
    Lim, Adoree Y. Y.
    Zhu, Ling
    Ganguly, Sonali
    Finkelstein, Eric A.
    Goh, Su-Yen
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2020, 23 (07) : 842 - 850
  • [5] Discrete Choice Experiment to Understand Japanese Patients’ and Physicians’ Preferences for Preventive Treatments for Migraine
    Jaein Seo
    Tommi Tervonen
    Kaname Ueda
    Dian Zhang
    Daisuke Danno
    Antje Tockhorn-Heidenreich
    Neurology and Therapy, 2023, 12 : 651 - 668
  • [6] Discrete Choice Experiment to Understand Japanese Patients' and Physicians' Preferences for Preventive Treatments for Migraine
    Seo, Jaein
    Tervonen, Tommi
    Ueda, Kaname
    Zhang, Dian
    Danno, Daisuke
    Tockhorn-Heidenreich, Antje
    NEUROLOGY AND THERAPY, 2023, 12 (02) : 651 - 668
  • [7] Patient and oncologist preferences for attributes of treatments in advanced melanoma: a discrete choice experiment
    Liu, Frank Xiaoqing
    Witt, Edward A.
    Ebbinghaus, Scot
    Beyer, Grace DiBonaventura
    Shinde, Reshma
    Basurto, Enrique
    Joseph, Richard W.
    PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2017, 11 : 1389 - 1399
  • [8] A Discrete-Choice Experiment Assessing the Patient Preferences and Real-World Experiences of Patients with Migraine in Japan
    Takeshima, Takao
    Yuasa, Akira
    Lloyd, Yukie Michelle
    Watanabe, Louis Patrick
    Kamei, Kazumasa
    Terasawa, Akiho
    Coulter, Josh
    Abraham, Lucy
    Hauber, Brett
    Iijima, Masahiro
    NEUROLOGY AND THERAPY, 2024, 13 (06) : 1661 - 1683
  • [9] Patient Preferences for Attributes of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Medications in Germany and Spain: An Online Discrete-Choice Experiment Survey
    Carol Mansfield
    Mirko V. Sikirica
    Amy Pugh
    Christine M. Poulos
    Victoria Unmuessig
    Raul Morano
    Alan A. Martin
    Diabetes Therapy, 2017, 8 : 1365 - 1378
  • [10] Patient Preferences for Attributes of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Medications in Germany and Spain: An Online Discrete-Choice Experiment Survey
    Mansfield, Carol
    Sikirica, Mirko V.
    Pugh, Amy
    Poulos, Christine M.
    Unmuessig, Victoria
    Morano, Raul
    Martin, Alan A.
    DIABETES THERAPY, 2017, 8 (06) : 1365 - 1378