Beyond Replication: Secondary Qualitative Data Analysis in Political Science

被引:2
|
作者
Kern, Florian G. [1 ,3 ]
Mustasilta, Katariina [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Essex, Dept Govt, Colchester, England
[2] Finnish Inst Int Affairs, Helsinki, Finland
[3] Univ Essex, Wivenhoe Pk, Colchester CO4 3SQ, England
关键词
secondary qualitative data analysis; qualitative research; transparency; resilience; Sub-Saharan Africa; TRADITIONAL GOVERNANCE; DATA ACCESS; TRANSPARENCY; CONFLICT;
D O I
10.1177/00104140221139388
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Shared qualitative data - such as interview or focus group transcripts - can be used for secondary qualitative data analysis (SQDA). Yet, much archived qualitative data remains unused after primary analysis. Applications and guidance on how to employ SQDA are rare. We use an example application of SQDA studying informal institutions and resilience in Sub-Saharan Africa to show: First, SQDA depends on how primary researchers share 'raw' qualitative data and additional documentation to understand primary context. Second, deductive and inductive uses of SQDA require varying engagement with primary data. Third, current practices of participant consent often do not consider potential SQDA. Fourth, SQDA is not less time-consuming than primary data research but offers different benefits, such as expanding the comparative sample of cases or avoiding research fatigue of studied communities. Going forward, SQDA requires greater consensus on the instruments (e.g. transcripts and participant consent forms) used by researchers and further applications of hypothesis-testing and hypothesis-generating designs.
引用
收藏
页码:1224 / 1256
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Transparency and Replication in Brazilian Political Science: A First Look
    Avelino, George
    Desposato, Scott
    Mardegan, Ivan
    DADOS-REVISTA DE CIENCIAS SOCIAIS, 2021, 64 (03):
  • [2] Secondary analysis of qualitative data
    Szabo, V
    Strang, VR
    ADVANCES IN NURSING SCIENCE, 1997, 20 (02) : 66 - 74
  • [3] Planning, implementing and reporting: increasing transparency, replicability and credibility in qualitative political science research
    Closa, Carlos
    EUROPEAN POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 20 (02) : 270 - 280
  • [4] Recommendations for Secondary Analysis of Qualitative Data
    Chatfield, Sheryl L.
    QUALITATIVE REPORT, 2020, 25 (03) : 833 - 842
  • [5] Can We Do Better? Replication and Online Appendices in Political Science
    Grossman, Jonathan
    Pedahzur, Ami
    PERSPECTIVES ON POLITICS, 2021, 19 (03) : 906 - 911
  • [6] Qualitative data sharing and synthesis for sustainability science
    Alexander, Steven M.
    Jones, Kristal
    Bennett, Nathan J.
    Budden, Amber
    Cox, Michael
    Crosas, Merce
    Game, Edward T.
    Geary, Janis
    Hardy, R. Dean
    Johnson, Jay T.
    Karcher, Sebastian
    Motzer, Nicole
    Pittman, Jeremy
    Randell, Heather
    Silva, Julie A.
    Da Silva, Patricia Pinto
    Strasser, Carly
    Strawhacker, Colleen
    Stuhl, Andrew
    Weber, Nic
    NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 3 (02) : 81 - 88
  • [7] Planning, implementing and reporting: increasing transparency, replicability and credibility in qualitative political science research
    Carlos Closa
    European Political Science, 2021, 20 : 270 - 280
  • [8] Pluralism in qualitative research: the impact of different researchers and qualitative approaches on the analysis of qualitative data
    Frost, Nollaig
    Nolas, Sevasti Melissa
    Brooks-Gordon, Belinda
    Esin, Cigdem
    Holt, Amanda
    Mehdizadeh, Leila
    Shinebourne, Pnina
    QUALITATIVE RESEARCH, 2010, 10 (04) : 441 - 460
  • [9] Data and Code Availability in Political Science Publications from 1995 to 2022
    Rainey, Carlisle
    Roe, Harley
    Wang, Qing
    Zhou, Hao
    PS-POLITICAL SCIENCE & POLITICS, 2025, 58 (02) : 339 - 345
  • [10] Looking Beyond Numbers in Qualitative Research: From Data Saturation to Data Analysis
    Christou, Prokopis
    QUALITATIVE REPORT, 2025, 30 (01): : 3088 - 3100