Proportion of right ventricular failure and echocardiographic predictors in continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Benedetto, Maria [1 ]
Piccone, Giulia [1 ]
Nardozi, Ludovica [1 ]
Baca, Georgiana Luisa [2 ]
Baiocchi, Massimo [1 ]
机构
[1] IRCSS Azienda Osped Univ Bologna, Cardiothorac & Vasc Dept, Anaesthesiol & Intens Care, Via Albertoni 15, Bologna, Italy
[2] NIA, Lab Cardiovasc Sci, NIH, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
Right ventricular failure; Continuous-flow LVAD; Echocardiographic assessment; Advanced heart failure; RIGHT HEART-FAILURE; SPECKLE-TRACKING ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION; AMERICAN SOCIETY; DIAMETER RATIO; STATEMENT; STRAIN; RISK; IMPLANTATION; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1007/s12055-022-01447-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Right ventricular failure (RVF) in patients with a continuous-flow left ventricle assist device (CF-LVAD) is associated with higher incidence of mortality. This systematic review aims to assess the overall proportion of RVF and the pre-operative echocardiographic parameters which are best correlating to RVF.Methods A systematic research was conducted between 2008 and 2019 on MEDLINE, EMBASE, PUBMED, UPTODATE, OVID, COCHRANE LIBRARY, and Google Scholar electronic databases by performing a PRISMA flowchart. All observational studies regarding echocardiographic predictors of RVF in patients undergoing CF-LVAD implantation were included.Results A total number of 19 observational human studies published between 2008 and 2019 were included. We identified 524 RVF patients out of a pooled final population of 1741 patients. The RVF overall proportion was 28.25% with 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.24-0.34. The highest variability of perioperative echocardiographic parameters between the RVF and no right ventricular failure (NO-RVF) groups has been found with tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), fractional area change (FAC), and right ventricular global longitudinal strain (RVGLS). Their standardized mean deviation (SMD) was - 0.33 (95% CI - 0.54 to - 0.11; p value 0.003), - 0.34 (95% CI - 0.53 to - 0.15; p value 0.0001), and 0.52 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.25; p value 0.0001), respectively.Conclusions The echocardiographic predictors of RVF after CF-LVAD placement are still uncertain. However, there seems to be a trend of statistical correlation between TAPSE, FAC, and RVGLS with RVF event after CF-LVAD placement.
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 181
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prediction of right ventricular failure after ventricular assist device implant: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
    Bellavia, Diego
    Iacovoni, Attilio
    Scardulla, Cesare
    Moja, Lorenzo
    Pilato, Michele
    Kushwaha, Sudhir S.
    Senni, Michele
    Clemenza, Francesco
    Agnese, Valentina
    Falletta, Calogero
    Romano, Giuseppe
    Maalouf, Joseph
    Dandel, Michael
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2017, 19 (07) : 926 - 946
  • [22] Clinical Outcomes After Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device A Systematic Review
    McIlvennan, Colleen K.
    Magid, Kate H.
    Ambardekar, Amrut V.
    Thompson, Jocelyn S.
    Matlock, Daniel D.
    Allen, Larry A.
    CIRCULATION-HEART FAILURE, 2014, 7 (06) : 1003 - U237
  • [23] Predictors of right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation
    Koprivanac, Marijan
    Kelava, Marta
    Siric, Franjo
    Cruz, Vincent B.
    Moazami, Nader
    Mihaljevic, Tomislav
    CROATIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 55 (06) : 587 - 595
  • [24] Pulmonary artery pulsatility index as a predictor of right ventricular failure in left ventricular assist device recipients: A systematic review
    Essandoh, Michael
    Kumar, Nicolas
    Hussain, Nasir
    Dalia, Adam A.
    Wang, David
    Al-Qudsi, Omar
    Wilsak, David
    Stahl, David
    Bhatt, Amar
    Awad, Hamdy
    Sawyer, Tamara R.
    Iyer, Manoj H.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 41 (08) : 1114 - 1123
  • [25] Right Ventricular Failure Post-Implantation of Left Ventricular Assist Device: Prevalence, Pathophysiology, and Predictors
    Ali, Hyeon-Ju R.
    Kiernan, Michael S.
    Choudhary, Gaurav
    Levine, Daniel J.
    Sodha, Neel R.
    Ehsan, Afshin
    Yousefzai, Rayan
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2020, 66 (06) : 610 - 619
  • [26] Effects of the HeartMate II continuous-flow left ventricular assist device on right ventricular function
    Lee, Sangjin
    Kamdar, Forum
    Madlon-Kay, Richard
    Boyle, Andrew
    Colvin-Adams, Monica
    Pritzker, Marc
    John, Ranjit
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 29 (02) : 209 - 215
  • [27] Right Ventricular Failure After Left Ventricular Assist Device
    Cogswell, Rebecca
    John, Ranjit
    Shaffer, Andrew
    CARDIOLOGY CLINICS, 2020, 38 (02) : 219 - +
  • [28] Echocardiographic Parameters of Right Ventricular Size and Function Associated With Right Heart Failure After Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Chai, Jia Cheng Kevyn
    Chew, Jia Le
    Amarasekera, Anjalee
    Aboumarie, Hatem Soliman
    Tan, Timothy C.
    ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY-A JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ULTRASOUND AND ALLIED TECHNIQUES, 2025, 42 (03):
  • [29] Right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation: a review of the literature
    Coco, Valeria Lo
    Piero, Maria Elena De
    Massimi, Giulio
    Chiarini, Giovanni
    Raffa, Giuseppe M.
    Kowalewski, Mariusz
    Maessen, Jos
    Lorusso, Roberto
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2021, 13 (02) : 1256 - 1269
  • [30] Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and survival in advanced heart failure patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Elkaryoni, Ahmed
    Al Badarin, Firas
    Khan, Muhammad Shahzeb
    Ellakany, Karim
    Potturi, Nikitha
    Poonia, Jasmin
    Kennedy, Kevin F.
    Magalski, Anthony
    Sperry, Brett W.
    Wimmer, Alan P.
    EUROPACE, 2019, 21 (09): : 1353 - 1359