Public transport in the UK: Considerations for continued rehabilitation and future planning for a sector impacted by COVID-19

被引:0
作者
Coleman, Anna [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Gartland, Nicola [1 ,2 ]
Johnson, Sheena [3 ,4 ]
Fishwick, David [1 ,2 ,4 ]
van Tongeren, Martie [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Sch Hlth Sci, Ctr Occupat & Environm Hlth, Manchester, England
[2] Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, Manchester, England
[3] Univ Manchester, Alliance Manchester Business Sch, Manchester, England
[4] Univ Manchester, Thomas Ashton Inst Risk & Regulatory Res, Manchester, England
[5] Univ Manchester, Ctr Occupat & Environm Hlth, 4th Floor Ellen Wilkinson Bldg,Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PL, England
关键词
COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Public transport; Recovery; Planning; Qualitative;
D O I
10.1016/j.trip.2024.101044
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
Global public transport strategies changed significantly through the pandemic to help restrict the spread of SARSCoV-2, keep travellers and workers safe and ensure service sustainability. UK Government guidance during phases of lock -down led to greatly reduced usage. By February 2022, most restrictions lifted but the sector was struggling with wider issues including the cost of living crisis, effects of war in Ukraine, industrial action, BREXIT and staff shortages. With public transport stakeholders, we developed policy recommendations to assist the sector with recovery from the pandemic. Priorities included increasing footfall while keeping workers and passengers safe following removal of most COVID-19 restrictions, and contributing to wider agendas of societal interconnectivity, levelling up and climate goals. This paper focusses specifically on the UK, drawing on longitudinal qualitative interviews with experts, organisational representatives (including unions), transport workers and passengers conducted between January 2021 and September 2022. This longitudinal approach allowed examination of changes in opinions across the sector over time. There was a shift in perceptions and priorities regarding both COVID-19 safety and business stability. Initially the focus was on delivering/receiving an essential service while maintaining the safety of workers and travellers. However, over time, although safety in relation to potential viral spread remained (especially for experts) this became secondary to business stability (organisational leaders) and service reliability (passengers) and the wider context (COVID-19 risk, energy costs, worker shortages, travel patterns etc.) had changed significantly. Policy recommendations are made for short term recovery, preparedness for future health emergencies and longer -term sustainability of the sector.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Anable J., 2022, Less Is More: Changing Travel in a Post-Pandemic Society
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2022, Financial Times Online
  • [3] Calder S., 2023, INDEPENDENT
  • [4] The Post-Pandemic Recovery of Transport Activity: Emerging Mobility Patterns and Repercussions on Future Evolution
    Christidis, Panayotis
    Christodoulou, Aris
    Navajas-Cawood, Elena
    Ciuffo, Biagio
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (11)
  • [5] Coleman A., 2022, PERCEPTIONS TRANSMIS
  • [6] Coleman A., 2023, Perceptions of transmission and mitigation of SARS-CoV-2: Cross sector Theme 3 WP1 Deep dives. Views of those operating in selected work sectors under the 'Living with COVID' phase of the pandemic. PROTECT
  • [7] Confederation of Public Transport (CPT), Online CPT Reacts: Three-month extension to BRG and 2 single fare cap
  • [8] Department for Levelling up Housing and Communities, 2022, Policy Paper
  • [9] Department for Transport, 2020, about us
  • [10] Department for Transport, 2021, Policy paper