Ground Ambulance Billing And Prices Differ By Ownership Structure

被引:5
作者
Adler, Loren [1 ]
Ly, Bich [2 ]
Duffy, Erin [3 ]
Hannick, Kathleen [4 ]
Hall, Mark [4 ]
Trish, Erin [3 ]
机构
[1] Brookings Inst, Washington, DC 20036 USA
[2] Univ Southern Calif, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Univ Southern Calif, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Wake Forest Univ, Winston Salem, NC USA
关键词
D O I
10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00738
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The No Surprises Act prohibits most surprise billing but notably does not apply to ground ambulance services. In this study we created a novel data set that identifies the ownership structure of ground ambulance organizations to compare pricing and billing between private and public-sector ambulances, with a specific focus on organizations owned by private equity or publicly traded companies. Overall, we found that 28 percent of commercially insured emergency ground ambulance transports during the period 2014-17 resulted in a potential surprise bill. Our analysis illustrates that being transported by a private-sector ambulance in an emergency comes with substantially higher allowed amounts, patient cost sharing, and potential surprise bills compared with being transported by a public-sector ambulance. Further, allowed amounts and cost sharing tended to be higher for private equity- or publicly traded company-owned ambulances than other private-sector ambulances. These findings highlight substantial patient liability and important differences in pricing and billing patterns between public-and private-sector ground ambulance organizations.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 236
页数:10
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Amin K., 2021, GROUND AMBULANCE RID
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2022, Medicare physician other practitioners - by provider and service data dictionary
  • [3] Out-of-Network Air Ambulance Bills: Prevalence, Magnitude, and Policy Solutions
    Brown, Erin C. Fuse
    Trish, Erin
    Ly, Bich
    Hall, Mark
    Adler, Loren
    [J]. MILBANK QUARTERLY, 2020, 98 (03) : 747 - 774
  • [4] Most Patients Undergoing Ground And Air Ambulance Transportation Receive Sizable Out-Of-Network Bills
    Chhabra, Karan R.
    McGuire, Keegan
    Sheetz, Kyle H.
    Scott, John W.
    Nuliyalu, Ushapoorna
    Ryan, Andrew M.
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2020, 39 (05) : 777 - 782
  • [5] Surprise! Out-of-Network Billing for Emergency Care in the United States
    Cooper, Zack
    Scott Morton, Fiona
    Shekita, Nathan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2020, 128 (09) : 3626 - 3677
  • [6] Department of Health and Human Services, 2021, News release, BidenHarris administration announces steps to protect consumers and improve ground ambulance billing practices through No Surprises Act implementation
  • [7] Galvin G, 2022, Surprise medical billing is now banned. The public is still concerned about unexpected ER charges
  • [8] One In Five Inpatient Emergency Department Cases May Lead To Surprise Bills
    Garmon, Christopher
    Chartock, Benjamin
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2017, 36 (01) : 177 - 181
  • [9] Hargraves J, 2019, How common is out-of-network billing?
  • [10] Equilibrium Provider Networks: Bargaining and Exclusion in Health Care Markets
    Ho, Kate
    Lee, Robin S.
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2019, 109 (02) : 473 - 522