Strengthening the equity focus of applied public health research: introducing the FOR EQUITY platform

被引:0
作者
Popay, J. [1 ]
Chekar, C. K. [1 ]
Griffiths, A. [1 ]
Halliday, E. [1 ]
Kaloudis, H. [1 ]
Leiper, R. [1 ]
Panagaki, K. [1 ]
Porroche-Escudero, A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lancaster, Div Hlth Res, Fac Hlth & Med, Lancaster LA1 4YG, England
[2] Univ Lancaster, Lancaster Environm Ctr, Lancaster LA1 4YE, England
关键词
Health equity; Health inequalities; Intersectionality; Toolkits; INEQUALITIES;
D O I
10.1016/hpuhe.2022.11.018
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives: Much applied health research pays insufficient attention to potential unequal impacts across social groups or is typically focused on a single dimension (e.g. socio-economic status), rarely considering the intersecting social processes driving inequalities (e.g. racism, sexism, classism). All health research needs a strong intersectional equity focus in order to inform action to reduce health inequalities as well as improve population health. Study design: Focus On Research and Equity (FOR EQUITY) is a new Web -based platform aiming to strengthen the intersectional equity focus of applied health research. Methods: The platform was developed in collaboration with members of the public, practitioners and researchers working internationally. The development involved a systematic review of academic and grey literature, a series of workshops and user testing. Results: FOR EQUITY encompasses (1) a Health Inequalities Assessment Tool, with an intersectional perspective on inequalities; (2) a FOR EQUITY Guidance Inventory providing access to a range of international research toolkits and guidance; and (3) a FOR EQUITY Library including case studies illustrating how researchers have attempted to integrate an equity lens into the research process and more general resources on health inequalities. Conclusion: FOR EQUITY can support researchers to strengthen the equity lens in their studies to make research evidence more relevant for action to reduce social and health inequalities. However, a single focus on toolkits is unlikely to sufficiently address the barriers to embedding equity in research. A mainstreaming strategy to transform the very roots of the 'institution of research' is required. (C) 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Royal Society for Public Health. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 16
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Social determinants as moderators of the effectiveness of health behavior change interventions: scientific gaps and opportunities
    Alcantara, Carmela
    Diaz, Sarah Valentina
    Cosenzo, Luciana Giorgio
    Loucks, Eric B.
    Penedo, Frank J.
    Williams, Natasha J.
    [J]. HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2020, 14 (01) : 132 - 144
  • [2] Berghs M, 2016, Implications for public health research of models and theories of disability: a scoping study and evidence synthesis, DOI [10.3310/phr04080, DOI 10.3310/PHR04080]
  • [3] HOKE F, 1994, SCIENTIST, V8, P1
  • [4] Understanding unequal ageing: towards a synthesis of intersectionality and life course analyses
    Holman, Daniel
    Walker, Alan
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGEING, 2021, 18 (02) : 239 - 255
  • [5] Falling down the rabbit hole? Methodological, conceptual and policy issues in current health inequalities research
    Kelly-Irving, Michelle
    Ball, William Patrick
    Bambra, Clare
    Delpierre, Cyrille
    Dundas, Ruth
    Lynch, Julia
    McCartney, Gerry
    Smith, Katherine
    [J]. CRITICAL PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 33 (01) : 37 - 47
  • [6] What types of interventions generate inequalities? Evidence from systematic reviews
    Lorenc, Theo
    Petticrew, Mark
    Welch, Vivian
    Tugwell, Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2013, 67 (02) : 190 - 193
  • [7] Defining health and health inequalities
    McCartney, G.
    Popham, F.
    McMaster, R.
    Cumbers, A.
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 172 : 22 - 30
  • [8] Are interventions to promote healthy eating equally effective for all? Systematic review of socioeconomic inequalities in impact
    McGill, Rory
    Anwar, Elspeth
    Orton, Lois
    Bromley, Helen
    Lloyd-Williams, Ffion
    O'Flaherty, Martin
    Taylor-Robinson, David
    Guzman-Castillo, Maria
    Gillespie, Duncan
    Moreira, Patricia
    Allen, Kirk
    Hyseni, Lirije
    Calder, Nicola
    Petticrew, Mark
    White, Martin
    Whitehead, Margaret
    Capewell, Simon
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2015, 15
  • [9] NHS England, Evidence for the 5 clinical priorities
  • [10] Applying an equity lens to interventions: using PROGRESS ensures consideration of socially stratifying factors to illuminate inequities in health
    O'Neill, Jennifer
    Tabish, Hilary
    Welch, Vivian
    Petticrew, Mark
    Pottie, Kevin
    Clarke, Mike
    Evans, Tim
    Pardo, Jordi Pardo
    Waters, Elizabeth
    White, Howard
    Tugwell, Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 67 (01) : 56 - 64