Corporate social responsibility performance and social reputation via corporate social responsibility awarding: is there a threshold effect?

被引:1
作者
Kuzey, Cemil [1 ]
Uyar, Ali [2 ]
Ellili, Nejla Ould Daoud [3 ]
Karaman, Abdullah S. [4 ]
机构
[1] Murray State Univ, Arthur J Bauernfeind Coll Business, Murray, KY USA
[2] Excelia Grp, Excelia Business Sch, La Rochelle, France
[3] Abu Dhabi Univ, Coll Business Adm, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
[4] Amer Univ Middle East, Coll Engn & Technol, Egaila, Kuwait
来源
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY | 2024年 / 24卷 / 05期
关键词
CSR; Environmental performance; Social performance; CSR award; Threshold effect; C33; G32; G34; SUSTAINABILITY DISCLOSURE; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; FIRMS; INDUSTRY; IMPACT; MATTER; SALES;
D O I
10.1108/CG-03-2023-0128
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
PurposeThis study aims to examine the potential threshold effect in the association between corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance and social reputation.Design/methodology/approachThis study includes an international and cross-sector sample covering 41 countries, nine sectors and 45,395 firm-year observations. It applies a parabolic relationship, rather than linear regressions, between CSR engagement and social reputation via CSR awarding. This implies that CSR performance should increase until a certain point to gain a social reputation but then should decrease after reaching that threshold point considering limited financial resources.FindingsThe findings of country-industry-year fixed-effects logistic regressions confirm the threshold effect with an inverted U-shaped relationship between CSR and CSR awarding. More specifically, firms increase their environmental and social engagement until a certain point, and then they reduce it after reaching a social reputation. This finding is confirmed by three dimensions of the environmental pillar (i.e. resource use, emissions and eco-innovation) as well as four dimensions of the social pillar (i.e. workforce, human rights, community and product responsibility). The findings are robust to alternative samples, alternative methodology and endogeneity concerns.Practical implicationsThe findings of this study have implications for firms about the better allocation of available funds between CSR and operations. The findings could be particularly useful for CSR teams/committees of the firms who formulate CSR policies and how to mobilize firm resources for better social enhancement via environmental and social reputation.Originality/valueThis study examines deeper the nature of the association between CSR engagement and social reputation and considers the possibility of an inverted U-shaped relationship between them. The determination of a threshold effect suggests that CSR engagement increases social reputation, but once it reaches a certain point, social reputation will decrease owing to financial resource constraints.
引用
收藏
页码:993 / 1020
页数:28
相关论文
共 95 条
[1]   Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility: new evidence from China [J].
Aboud, Ahmed ;
Yang, Xinming .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2022, 30 (02) :211-229
[2]   Board composition, ownership structure and corporate social responsibility disclosure: the case of Jordan [J].
Abu Qa'dan, Mohammad Bassam ;
Suwaidan, Mishiel Said .
SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY JOURNAL, 2019, 15 (01) :28-46
[3]   Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure of banking sector in Pakistan [J].
Ali, Rizwan ;
Rehman, Ramiz Ur ;
Kanwal, Madiha ;
Naseem, Muhammad Akram ;
Ahmad, Muhammad Ishfaq .
SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY JOURNAL, 2022, 18 (05) :1019-1034
[4]   When Does Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure Affect Investment Efficiency? A New Answer to an Old Question [J].
Anwar, Rehana ;
Malik, Jaleel A. .
SAGE OPEN, 2020, 10 (02)
[5]   Do ESG Controversies Matter for Firm Value? Evidence from International Data [J].
Aouadi A. ;
Marsat S. .
Journal of Business Ethics, 2018, 151 (4) :1027-1047
[6]   Building Corporate Reputation Through Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosures. The Case of Colombian Companies [J].
Aranguren Gomez, Nagore ;
Maldonado Garcia, Stella .
CORPORATE REPUTATION REVIEW, 2023, 26 (04) :279-303
[7]   CSR performance and the cost of debt: does audit quality matter? [J].
Bacha, Sami ;
Ajina, Aymen ;
Ben Saad, Sourour .
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2021, 21 (01) :137-158
[8]   Lagged Explanatory Variables and the Estimation of Causal Effect [J].
Bellemare, Marc F. ;
Masaki, Takaaki ;
Pepinsky, Thomas B. .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2017, 79 (03) :949-963
[9]  
Bennett DA, 2001, AUST NZ J PUBL HEAL, V25, P464, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-842X.2001.tb00294.x
[10]   Doing better at dong good: When, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives [J].
Bhattacharya, CB ;
Sen, S .
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2004, 47 (01) :9-+