Barriers and facilitators to offering post-intensive care follow-up services from the perspective of critical care professionals: A qualitative study

被引:4
作者
Zhang, Feng [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Zhen [1 ]
Xue, Dan-dan [3 ]
Zhang, Rui [1 ,2 ]
Cheng, Yun [4 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Huadong Hosp, Intens Care Unit, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Sch Nursing, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Hong Kong, Li Ka Shing Fac Med, Sch Nursing, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Fudan Univ, Huadong Hosp, Nursing Dept, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
ICU follow-up; ICU survivors; intensive care unit; post-intensive care syndrome; qualitative research; RELATIONSHIP SATISFACTION; ILLNESS; UNIT; INTERVENTION; DISTRESS; OUTCOMES; ANXIETY; STRESS; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1111/nicc.13002
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: Various programmes and models for post-intensive care unit (ICU) follow-up services have been developed worldwide. In China, post-ICU follow-up remains in the exploratory stage and little is known regarding the appropriate form and challenges of implementation, which need to be further explored.Aim: This study aimed to explore and describe the barriers to and facilitators of post-ICU follow-up services from the perspective of critical care professionals.Design: This was a descriptive qualitative study. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 health care workers whose units had offered ICU survivors different forms of follow-up services; the data were analysed by qualitative content analysis during August 2022 and December 2022.Setting: The study was conducted at 14 ICUs in 11 tertiary hospitals in Shanghai, China.Findings: Seventeen subthemes were extracted as barriers and facilitators in the follow-up of ICU survivors. In the initiating process, the barriers included the restriction of decision-making rights and scope of practice, indifferent attitude towards survivors and repeated work. The facilitators included admitted significance, the needs of ICU survivors, the conscientiousness of professionals and the pioneers and leadership support. In the implementation process, lack of confidence, lack of cooperation in medical consortium, distrusted relationships, restrictions of medical insurance, ageing problems and insufficient human resources acted as barriers, whereas lessons learned, positive feedback and digital support served as facilitators. Furthermore, recommendations and tips were identified for offering follow-up services.Conclusion: Medical personnel can better utilize available resources and develop strategies to overcome constraints by gaining insights into the abovementioned barriers and facilitators. The findings of this study can provide a useful reference for structured and systematic follow-ups to ameliorate post-intensive care syndrome in low- and middle-income countries.Relevance to Clinical Practice: Publicity and educational measures play a crucial role in enhancing the awareness of survivors and the consensus of health care professionals from medical consortium regarding impairments after critical care. Leadership and policy support can address numerous obstacles to guiding follow-up services.
引用
收藏
页码:682 / 694
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Post intensive care syndrome - from risk at ICU admission to 3 months follow-up clinic
    J Torres
    C Veiga
    F Pinto
    A Ferreira
    F Sousa
    R Jacinto
    E Molinos
    D Carvalho
    C Dias
    E Gomes
    R Araújo
    Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, 3 (Suppl 1)
  • [42] Post-Intensive Care Syndrome in Survivors from Critical Illness including COVID-19 Patients: A Narrative Review
    Vrettou, Charikleia S.
    Mantziou, Vassiliki
    Vassiliou, Alice G.
    Orfanos, Stylianos E.
    Kotanidou, Anastasia
    Dimopoulou, Ioanna
    LIFE-BASEL, 2022, 12 (01):
  • [43] The Caregiver Pathway, a Model for the Systematic and Individualized Follow-up of Family Caregivers at Intensive Care Units: Development Study
    Watland, Solbjorg
    Nes, Lise Solberg
    Hanson, Elizabeth
    Ekstedt, Mirjam
    Stenberg, Una
    Borosund, Elin
    JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH, 2023, 7
  • [44] Intensive care unit clinicians identify many barriers to, and facilitators of, early mobilisation: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework
    Anekwe, David E.
    Milner, Siobhan C.
    Bussieres, Andre
    de Marchie, Michel
    Spahija, Jadranka
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2020, 66 (02) : 120 - 127
  • [45] Memories and health-related quality of life after intensive care: A follow-up study
    Ringdal, Mona
    Plos, Kaety
    Otenwall, Per
    Bergbom, Ingegerd
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2010, 38 (01) : 38 - 44
  • [46] Patients' experiences and perspectives of post-hospital follow-up care to improve physical recovery for intensive care survivors: A systematic review of qualitative research
    Rea, Nicola M. A.
    Neubeck, Lis
    Kydonaki, Kalliopi
    Mchale, Sheona
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES ADVANCES, 2023, 5
  • [47] Barriers and facilitators of adherence to medical advice on skin self-examination during melanoma follow-up care
    Koerner, Annett
    Drapeau, Martin
    Thombs, Brett D.
    Rosberger, Zeev
    Wang, Beatrice
    Khanna, Manish
    Spatz, Alan
    Coroiu, Adina
    Garland, Rosalind
    Batist, Gerald
    BMC DERMATOLOGY, 2013, 13
  • [48] Cognition and practice on transitional care during the transfer from intensive care unit to a general ward among health care professionals: A qualitative study
    Zhan, Yuxin
    Yu, Jiaohua
    Zhang, Wenya
    Wan, Yali
    Chen, Yi
    Wang, Yinyue
    Li, Suyun
    JOURNAL OF NURSING MANAGEMENT, 2022, 30 (08) : 4569 - 4577
  • [49] Facilitators and barriers to initiating change in medical intensive care unit survivors with alcohol use disorders: A qualitative study
    Clark, Brendan J.
    Jones, Jacqueline
    Cook, Paul
    Tian, Karen
    Moss, Marc
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2013, 28 (05) : 849 - 856
  • [50] Improving mesothelioma follow-up care in the UK: a qualitative study to build a multidisciplinary pyramid of care approach
    Davey, Zoe
    Henshall, Catherine
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (11):