Functional connectivity between the amygdala and prefrontal cortex underlies processing of emotion ambiguity

被引:17
作者
Sun, Sai [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Hongbo [3 ]
Yu, Rongjun [4 ]
Wang, Shuo [5 ]
机构
[1] Tohoku Univ, Frontier Res Inst Interdisciplinary Sci, 6-3 Aramaki Aza Aoba,Aoba Ku, Sendai 9808578, Japan
[2] Tohoku Univ, Res Inst Elect Commun, 2-1-1 Katahira,Aoba Ku, Sendai 9808577, Japan
[3] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
[4] Hong Kong Baptist Univ, Dept Management Mkt & Informat Syst, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[5] Washington Univ St Louis, Dept Radiol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
ANTERIOR CINGULATE CORTEX; FACIAL-EXPRESSION; NEURAL RESPONSES; DECISION-MAKING; SYSTEMS; FACES; PERCEPTION; ATTENTION; FEAR; NEUROANATOMY;
D O I
10.1038/s41398-023-02625-w
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Processing facial expressions of emotion draws on a distributed brain network. In particular, judging ambiguous facial emotions involves coordination between multiple brain areas. Here, we applied multimodal functional connectivity analysis to achieve network-level understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying perceptual ambiguity in facial expressions. We found directional effective connectivity between the amygdala, dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC), and ventromedial PFC, supporting both bottom-up affective processes for ambiguity representation/perception and top-down cognitive processes for ambiguity resolution/decision. Direct recordings from the human neurosurgical patients showed that the responses of amygdala and dmPFC neurons were modulated by the level of emotion ambiguity, and amygdala neurons responded earlier than dmPFC neurons, reflecting the bottom-up process for ambiguity processing. We further found parietal-frontal coherence and delta-alpha cross-frequency coupling involved in encoding emotion ambiguity. We replicated the EEG coherence result using independent experiments and further showed modulation of the coherence. EEG source connectivity revealed that the dmPFC top-down regulated the activities in other brain regions. Lastly, we showed altered behavioral responses in neuropsychiatric patients who may have dysfunctions in amygdala-PFC functional connectivity. Together, using multimodal experimental and analytical approaches, we have delineated a neural network that underlies processing of emotion ambiguity.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]   Effects of gaze on amygdala sensitivity to anger and fear faces [J].
Adams, RB ;
Gordon, HL ;
Baird, AA ;
Ambady, N ;
Kleck, RE .
SCIENCE, 2003, 300 (5625) :1536-1536
[2]   Neural systems for recognizing emotion [J].
Adolphs, R .
CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROBIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (02) :169-177
[3]   IMPAIRED RECOGNITION OF EMOTION IN FACIAL EXPRESSIONS FOLLOWING BILATERAL DAMAGE TO THE HUMAN AMYGDALA [J].
ADOLPHS, R ;
TRANEL, D ;
DAMASIO, H ;
DAMASIO, A .
NATURE, 1994, 372 (6507) :669-672
[4]   Fear, faces, and the human amygdala [J].
Adolphs, Ralph .
CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROBIOLOGY, 2008, 18 (02) :166-172
[5]   What does the amygdala contribute to social cognition? [J].
Adolphs, Ralph .
YEAR IN COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE 2010, 2010, 1191 :42-61
[6]   Computational Models of Performance Monitoring and Cognitive Control [J].
Alexander, William H. ;
Brown, Joshua W. .
TOPICS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2010, 2 (04) :658-677
[7]   Neuroanatomy of autism [J].
Amaral, David G. ;
Schumann, Cynthia Mills ;
Nordahl, Christine Wu .
TRENDS IN NEUROSCIENCES, 2008, 31 (03) :137-145
[8]   Emotion Effects on Attention, Amygdala Activation, and Functional Connectivity in Schizophrenia [J].
Anticevic, Alan ;
Repovs, Grega ;
Barch, Deanna M. .
SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 2012, 38 (05) :967-980
[9]   INSENSITIVITY TO FUTURE CONSEQUENCES FOLLOWING DAMAGE TO HUMAN PREFRONTAL CORTEX [J].
BECHARA, A ;
DAMASIO, AR ;
DAMASIO, H ;
ANDERSON, SW .
COGNITION, 1994, 50 (1-3) :7-15
[10]   CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE - A PRACTICAL AND POWERFUL APPROACH TO MULTIPLE TESTING [J].
BENJAMINI, Y ;
HOCHBERG, Y .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1995, 57 (01) :289-300