Earnings information and public preferences for university tuition: Evidence from representative experiments

被引:6
作者
Lergetporer, Philipp [1 ,2 ]
Woessmann, Ludger [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Sch Management, Ifo Inst, CESifo, Campus Heilbronn, Munich, Germany
[2] IZA, Bonn, Germany
[3] Univ Munich, Munich, Germany
[4] Ifo Inst, Munich, Germany
[5] Stanford Univ, Hoover Inst, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[6] IZA, CESifo, Bonn, Germany
[7] CAGE, Coventry, England
关键词
Tuition; Higher education; Information; Earnings premium; Public opinion; Voting; EDUCATION SPENDING EVIDENCE; POLITICAL-ECONOMY; REDISTRIBUTION EVIDENCE; COLLEGE ATTENDANCE; CREDIT CONSTRAINTS; FEES AFFECT; RETURNS; POLICY; MOBILITY; DEMAND;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpubeco.2023.104968
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Higher education finance depends on the public's preferences for charging tuition, which may be partly based on beliefs and awareness about the university earnings premium. To test whether public support for tuition depends on earnings information, we devise survey experiments in representative samples of the German electorate (N > 15,000). The electorate is divided, with a plurality opposing tuition. Providing information on the university earnings premium raises support for tuition by 7 percentage points, turning the plurality in favor. The opposition-reducing effect persists two weeks after treatment. While there is some evidence of informationbased updating of biased beliefs, the effect seems to mainly work through increased salience which triggers reduced consideration of financial constraints when forming preferences for tuition. Information on fiscal costs and unequal access does not affect public preferences. We subject the baseline result to various experimental tests of replicability, robustness, heterogeneity, and consequentiality.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 76 条
  • [1] Framing effects, earnings expectations, and the design of student loan repayment schemes
    Abraham, Katharine G.
    Filiz-Ozbay, Emel
    Ozbay, Erkut Y.
    Turner, Lesley J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2020, 183
  • [2] The Polarization of Reality
    Alesina, Alberto
    Miano, Armando
    Stantcheva, Stefanie
    [J]. AEA PAPERS AND PROCEEDINGS, 2020, 110 : 324 - 328
  • [3] Intergenerational Mobility and Preferences for Redistribution
    Alesina, Alberto
    Stantcheva, Stefanie
    Teso, Edoardo
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2018, 108 (02) : 521 - 554
  • [4] Alesina Alberto., 2018, Immigration and redistribution, DOI DOI 10.3386/W24733
  • [5] Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election
    Allcott, Hunt
    Gentzkow, Matthew
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2017, 31 (02) : 211 - 235
  • [6] Higher education funding
    Barr, N
    [J]. OXFORD REVIEW OF ECONOMIC POLICY, 2004, 20 (02) : 264 - 283
  • [7] Bettinger E., 2021, Working Paper
  • [8] The Role of Application Assistance and Information in College Decisions: Results from the H&R Block Fafsa Experiment
    Bettinger, Eric P.
    Long, Bridget Terry
    Oreopoulos, Philip
    Sanbonmatsu, Lisa
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2012, 127 (03) : 1205 - 1242
  • [9] Tuition fees and educational attainment
    Bietenbeck, Jan
    Leibing, Andreas
    Marcus, Jan
    Weinhardt, Felix
    [J]. EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2023, 154
  • [10] Echoes of rising tuition in students' borrowing, educational attainment, and homeownership in post-recession America
    Bleemer, Zachary
    Brown, Meta
    Lee, Donghoon
    Strair, Katherine
    van der Klaauw, Wilbert
    [J]. JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 2021, 122