Life cycle analysis and power optimization of three typical hydrogen supply chains

被引:1
|
作者
Jiang, Tingting [1 ]
Wei, Yanjing [1 ]
Liu, Xiaguo [2 ]
Jin, Qiang [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Inst Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Shanghai 200235, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangsu Environm Protect Grp Suzhou Co Ltd, Suzhou 215163, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, 800 Dongchuan Rd, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Engn Res Ctr Solid Waste Treatment & Reso, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
关键词
Hydrogen supply chain; Life cycle assessment; Power optimization; ENERGY; COAL; CAPTURE; COSTS; CELL; GAS;
D O I
10.1007/s10098-023-02595-z
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
With the exhaustion of traditional fossil fuels and environmental protection pressure, clean renewable energy has become a topic of high interest. At present, three hydrogen supply chains run into the mainstream, including conventional coal-based hydrogen production (CTH), methanol-to-hydrogen production (MTH) and ammonia-to-hydrogen production (ATH). In order to comprehensively understand the impact of these three hydrogen supply chains on the environment and select the cleanest hydrogen supply scheme, the hydrogen supply chains were analyzed by CML, Eco-indicator99 method and sensitivity analysis. Besides, through sensitivity analysis to understand the contribution of each phase to the environmental impact. Thus, the optimization direction is found, and beneficial enlightenment is provided for promoting and applying hydrogen energy. The results showed that the comprehensive environmental impact of ATH was much more severe, which 2.8 and 2.4 times that of the other two supply chains. In the ATH, the environmental load of ammonia production phase is the largest, while the methanol pyrolysis phase and coal gasification phase are the main load contributors to MTH and CTH. In addition, the study also found that electricity is the most sensitive parameter. When 100% clean energy is used, the environmental impact of all three supply chains is significantly reduced. Consequently, the objective of clean creation and feasible advancement of hydrogen industry can be accomplished by changing its innovation structure as well as smart utilization of clean energy for the power age. [GRAPHICS]
引用
收藏
页码:2561 / 2581
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Strategy-based optimization and life cycle environmental impact assessment of a stable photovoltaic power-to-hydrogen system
    Gu, Yu
    Chen, Qianqian
    Wang, Danfeng
    Tang, Zhiyong
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 315
  • [22] How certain are greenhouse gas reductions from bioenergy? Life cycle assessment and uncertainty analysis of wood pellet-to-electricity supply chains from forest residues
    Roeder, Mirjam
    Whittaker, Carly
    Thornley, Patricia
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2015, 79 : 50 - 63
  • [23] Forest biomass supply chains in Ireland: A life cycle assessment of GHG emissions and primary energy balances
    Murphy, Fionnuala
    Devlin, Ger
    McDonnell, Kevin
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 116 : 1 - 8
  • [24] Life cycle analysis of hydrogen - A well-to-wheels analysis for Portugal
    Pereira, Sergio Ramos
    Coelho, Margariola C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2013, 38 (05) : 2029 - 2038
  • [25] Comparative life cycle assessment of carbon-free ammonia as fuel for power generation based on the perspective of supply chains
    Lee, Ha Eun
    Ling, Jester Lih Jie
    Pae, Kook Pyo
    Solanki, Bhanupratap S.
    Park, Han Saem
    Ahn, Hyung Jun
    Seo, Hae Won
    Lee, See Hoon
    ENERGY, 2024, 312
  • [26] LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF WOOD-ENERGY SUPPLY CHAINS IN MEDITERRANEAN FORESTS
    Melis, Emanuela
    Orru, Pier Francesco
    Pilo, Cristina
    Uras, Gabriele
    PAPERS OF THE 26TH EUROPEAN BIOMASS CONFERENCE: SETTING THE COURSE FOR A BIOBASED ECONOMY, 2018, : 1324 - 1335
  • [27] Comparative Life Cycle Assessment and Carbon Footprint of Typical Hydrogen Energy Products
    Huang, Xiao-Yu
    Xie, Ming-Hui
    Li, Xiao-Wei
    Jiang, Le-Yong
    Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science, 2024, 45 (10): : 5641 - 5649
  • [28] Material Flow Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment of Polyethylene Terephthalate and Polyolefin Plastics Supply Chains in the United States
    Chaudhari, Utkarsh S.
    Johnson, Anne T.
    Reck, Barbara K.
    Handler, Robert M.
    Thompson, Vicki S.
    Hartley, Damon S.
    Young, Wendy
    Watkins, David
    Shonnard, David
    ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2022, 10 (39) : 13145 - 13155
  • [29] Environmental impact assessment of VOC emissions from biomass gasification power generation system based on life cycle analysis
    Sun, Yunqi
    Wang, Shuo
    Yang, Qing
    Li, Jianlan
    Wang, Liang
    Zhang, Shihong
    Yang, Haiping
    Chen, Hanping
    FUEL, 2023, 335
  • [30] Geospatial Life Cycle Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from US Liquefied Natural Gas Supply Chains
    Zhu, Yuanrui
    Allen, David T.
    Ravikumar, Arvind P.
    ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2024, 12 (49): : 17843 - 17854