Power transformer overload risk evaluation based on temperature rise simulation and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process

被引:2
|
作者
Zhang, Lei [1 ]
Li, Dajian [1 ]
Chen, Liangyuan [1 ]
Ma, Yuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Elect Power Res Inst Guangxi Power Grid Co Ltd, Guangxi Key Lab Intelligent Control & Maintenance, Nanning, Guangxi, Peoples R China
来源
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SMART ENERGY, ICSNRG 2022 | 2023年 / 2422卷
关键词
fuzzy analytic hierarchy process; transformer overload risk; temperature rise simulation calculation; evaluation;
D O I
10.1088/1742-6596/2422/1/012012
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The evaluation of transformer overload risk and operational safety is a systematic process. Selecting an appropriate method to accurately assess its overload operation risk is an urgent need for flexible control and safe and reliable operation of power systems. According to the thermal characteristics and state of the transformer, a method for evaluating the overload risk of transformers with improved accuracy based on temperature rise simulation calculation combined with the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) is proposed. The weights are calculated by fuzzy set theory and FAHP, and the overload risk of the transformer is finally determined. The method comprehensively considers the possible information conflict between the working condition data and the thermal characteristics of the structure itself, and the calculation results are accurate and the process is clear. The calculation results after substituting the actual data show that the method can accurately evaluate the overload risk and operational risk of the transformer. This method is beneficial to identify the relative importance of transformer overload risk factors, calculate transformer overload risk coefficients, and formulate transformer risk control methods.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluation of Electric Vehicle Charging Station Sitting Based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process
    Wang Meng
    Liu Kai
    Zhao Songhui
    2013 FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL MANUFACTURING AND AUTOMATION (ICDMA), 2013, : 568 - 571
  • [42] Health State Evaluation of Continuous Girder Bridge Based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process
    Li, Haitao
    SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENT AND TRANSPORTATION, PTS 1-4, 2012, 178-181 : 2285 - 2289
  • [43] Research and Application on QFD based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process
    Gong Lixiong
    Tang Liang
    Yang Mingzhong
    APPLIED MECHANICS AND MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, PTS 1-3, 2010, 29-32 : 2516 - 2520
  • [44] Classification of Urban Emergency Based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process
    He, Yaqin
    Du, Shengpin
    GREEN INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM AND SAFETY, 2016, 138 : 630 - 638
  • [45] An evaluation model of cruise ports using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process
    Tseng, Po-Hsing
    Yip, Tsz Leung
    MARITIME BUSINESS REVIEW, 2021, 6 (01) : 22 - 48
  • [46] Evaluation of the Human Settlement in Lhasa with Intuitionistic Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process
    Wang, Yiying
    Xu, Zeshui
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2018, 20 (01) : 29 - 44
  • [47] Evaluation of the Human Settlement in Lhasa with Intuitionistic Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process
    Yiying Wang
    Zeshui Xu
    International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 2018, 20 : 29 - 44
  • [48] The Evaluation in Weapon Operational Effectiveness Base on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process
    Zhao Yunpeng
    Li Nan
    ADVANCED MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS, PTS 1-3, 2011, 201-203 : 995 - 1000
  • [49] Risk analysis in construction sites using fuzzy reasoning and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process
    Majumder, Debasish
    Debnath, Joy
    Biswas, Animesh
    FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE: MODELING TECHNIQUES AND APPLICATIONS (CIMTA) 2013, 2013, 10 : 604 - 614
  • [50] Course Evaluation Method Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process
    Zhao, Chunna
    Zhao, Yu
    Tan, Xiaohui
    Li, Yingshun
    Luo, Liming
    Xiong, Yeqing
    2010 INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM ON COMPUTING, COMMUNICATION, CONTROL, AND MANAGEMENT (CCCM2010), VOL II, 2010, : 318 - 321