Responding strategically to natural hazards: the role of hazard experience, infrastructure vulnerability, and risk perception in transit agency coordination with stakeholders

被引:3
作者
Yu, Suyang [1 ]
Welch, Eric W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Ctr Sci Technol & Environm Policy Studies C STEPS, Sch Publ Affairs, Tempe, AZ 85281 USA
关键词
natural hazards; transit agency; risk perception; infrastructure vulnerability; interorganizational coordination; EXTREME-WEATHER-EVENTS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; DECISION-MAKING; DISASTER; RESILIENCE; MANAGEMENT; ADAPTATION; EMERGENCY; BLAME; ORGANIZATIONS;
D O I
10.1080/09640568.2022.2100246
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
How public organizations respond strategically to natural hazards is relevant for maintaining functionality and protecting citizens. An essential component of strategic response is coordinating with multiple organizations in ways that provide resources and mutual support. Drawing from resource dependence and cognitive behavior theories, we investigate how different contextual factors predict coordination strategy. We focus on transit agencies in the US and develop hypotheses about how the experience of natural hazards, the transit infrastructure conditions, and public managers' risk perceptions determine their coordination as responses to immediate and future extreme weather events. This study aims to contribute to the strategic management of natural hazards literature. In particular, we expect that the findings will illuminate how transit agencies consider service area vulnerabilities as part of their strategic coordination efforts. Further, the study will provide insights to managers who are facing the need to balance organizational capacity, risk, and equity.
引用
收藏
页码:108 / 130
页数:23
相关论文
共 101 条
[11]   Disaster vulnerabilities - How strong a push toward regionalism and intergovernmental cooperation? [J].
Caruson, Kiki ;
MacManus, Susan A. .
AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2008, 38 (03) :286-306
[12]   Organizing for Crisis Management: Building Governance Capacity and Legitimacy [J].
Christensen, Tom ;
Laegreid, Per ;
Rykkja, Lise H. .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2016, 76 (06) :887-897
[13]  
Collier S., 2008, POLITICS SECURING HO, P40
[14]   Rethinking security: Organizational fragility in extreme events [J].
Comfort, LK .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2002, 62 :98-107
[15]  
Cowell F., 2011, MEASURING INEQUALITY
[16]   SPORADIC, FLUID AND CONSTRICTED PROCESSES - 3 TYPES OF STRATEGIC DECISION-MAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS [J].
CRAY, D ;
MALLORY, GR ;
BUTLER, RJ ;
HICKSON, DJ ;
WILSON, DC .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 1988, 25 (01) :13-39
[17]  
Dash N., 2007, Natural Hazards Review, V8, P67, DOI DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2007)8:3(69)
[18]   Constrained growth: How experience, legitimacy, and age influence risk taking in organizations [J].
Desai, Vinit M. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2008, 19 (04) :594-608
[19]  
Dolan AH, 2006, J COASTAL RES, P1316
[20]  
Doyle J.C., 1996, Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, V5, P32, DOI DOI 10.1108/09653569610121222