Responding strategically to natural hazards: the role of hazard experience, infrastructure vulnerability, and risk perception in transit agency coordination with stakeholders

被引:3
作者
Yu, Suyang [1 ]
Welch, Eric W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Ctr Sci Technol & Environm Policy Studies C STEPS, Sch Publ Affairs, Tempe, AZ 85281 USA
关键词
natural hazards; transit agency; risk perception; infrastructure vulnerability; interorganizational coordination; EXTREME-WEATHER-EVENTS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; DECISION-MAKING; DISASTER; RESILIENCE; MANAGEMENT; ADAPTATION; EMERGENCY; BLAME; ORGANIZATIONS;
D O I
10.1080/09640568.2022.2100246
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
How public organizations respond strategically to natural hazards is relevant for maintaining functionality and protecting citizens. An essential component of strategic response is coordinating with multiple organizations in ways that provide resources and mutual support. Drawing from resource dependence and cognitive behavior theories, we investigate how different contextual factors predict coordination strategy. We focus on transit agencies in the US and develop hypotheses about how the experience of natural hazards, the transit infrastructure conditions, and public managers' risk perceptions determine their coordination as responses to immediate and future extreme weather events. This study aims to contribute to the strategic management of natural hazards literature. In particular, we expect that the findings will illuminate how transit agencies consider service area vulnerabilities as part of their strategic coordination efforts. Further, the study will provide insights to managers who are facing the need to balance organizational capacity, risk, and equity.
引用
收藏
页码:108 / 130
页数:23
相关论文
共 101 条
[1]   Geomorphology, natural hazards, vulnerability and prevention of natural disasters in developing countries [J].
Alcántara-Ayala, I .
GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2002, 47 (2-4) :107-124
[2]   Are all transit stations equal and equitable? Calculating sustainability, livability, health, & equity performance of smart growth & transit-oriented-development (TOD) [J].
Appleyard, Bruce S. ;
Frost, Alexander R. ;
Allen, Christopher .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT & HEALTH, 2019, 14
[3]   Who is held responsible when disaster strikes? The attribution of responsibility for a natural disaster in an urban election [J].
Arceneaux, K ;
Stein, RM .
JOURNAL OF URBAN AFFAIRS, 2006, 28 (01) :43-53
[4]   Fragility of transport assets exposed to multiple hazards: State-of-the-art review toward infrastructural resilience [J].
Argyroudis, Sotirios A. ;
Mitoulis, Stergios A. ;
Winter, Mike G. ;
Kaynia, Amir M. .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2019, 191
[5]   Sampling weights in latent variable modeling [J].
Asparouhov, T .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2005, 12 (03) :411-434
[6]   Transit Systems and Ridership under Extreme Weather and Climate Change Stress: An Urban Transportation Agenda for Hazards Geography [J].
Barnes, Mark .
GEOGRAPHY COMPASS, 2015, 9 (11) :604-616
[7]   Federal financial resources for disaster mitigation and resilience in the US water sector [J].
Brodmerkel, Anna ;
Carpenter, Adam T. ;
Morley, Kevin M. .
UTILITIES POLICY, 2020, 63
[8]  
Byrne B.M., 2013, Multivariate Applications Series: Structural Equation Modeling with Mplus: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming
[9]   Assessing Vulnerability of Transportation Networks for Disaster Response Operations [J].
Cantillo, Victor ;
Macea, Luis F. ;
Jaller, Miguel .
NETWORKS & SPATIAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 19 (01) :243-273
[10]   Natural Disaster and Democratic Legitimacy: The Public Opinion Consequences of Chile's 2010 Earthquake and Tsunami [J].
Carlin, Ryan E. ;
Love, Gregory J. ;
Zechmeister, Elizabeth J. .
POLITICAL RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2014, 67 (01) :3-15