Efficacy and safety of non-invasive brain stimulation on cognitive function for cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:10
|
作者
Li, Xueyan [1 ]
Dai, Jie [1 ]
Liu, Qingran [1 ]
Zhao, Zhenying [1 ]
Zhang, Xiaofeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Cangzhou City Ctr Hosp, Neurol Dept, Cangzhou 061000, Peoples R China
关键词
Schizophrenia; Cognitive dysfunction; Non -invasive brain stimulation; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Transcranial direct current stimulation; Meta-analysis; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; DORSOLATERAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX; NEGATIVE SYMPTOMS; DOUBLE-BLIND; MEMORY; RTMS; HALLUCINATIONS; UPDATE; MOTOR; TDCS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpsychires.2023.12.003
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Based on existing evidence of the effects of the most commonly used non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), which includes transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), we conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the cognitive improvement and safety of NIBS on schizophrenia-related cognitive impairment. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to assess the risk of bias of the included RCTs; Review Manager, version 5.4.1, was used to perform the statistical analysis. Twenty double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trials involving 997 patients were included. As a result, no significant improvement in cognitive function was observed after NIBS treatment. However, the overall treatment effect of the two main NIBS modes (i.e., rTMS and tDCS) was associated with significantly larger improvements in negative symptoms and good tolerability in patients with schizophrenia compared to sham-controls (SMD = -0.56, 95% CI [-1.03, -0.08], p = 0.02, I-2 = 88%). NIBS model and stimulus parameters influenced the effect of NIBS. More favorable effects were observed in patients who received rTMS stimulation (SMD = 0.25, 95% CI [0.01, 0.49], p = 0.04, I-2 = 0%) in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex with a stimulation intensity of 20 Hz (p = 0.004) for a period longer than 1 month (p < 0.05). Yet, due to the limited number of included studies and heterogeneity in both study design and target population, the results of this analysis need to be interpreted with caution.
引用
收藏
页码:174 / 186
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation on cognitive functioning in brain disorders: a meta-analysis
    Begemann, Marieke J.
    Brand, Bodyl A.
    Curcic-Blake, Branislava
    Aleman, Andre
    Sommer, Iris E.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 50 (15) : 2465 - 2486
  • [2] Non-invasive brain stimulation for negative symptoms in schizophrenia: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Osoegawa, Caio
    Gomes, July Silveira
    Grigolon, Ruth Bartelli
    Brietzke, Elisa
    Gadelha, Ary
    Lacerda, Acioly L. T.
    Dias, Alvaro Machado
    Cordeiro, Quirino
    Laranjeira, Ronaldo
    de Jesus, Danilo
    Daskalakis, Zafiris Jeff
    Brunelin, Jerome
    Cordes, Joachim
    Trevizol, Alisson Paulino
    SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2018, 197 : 34 - 44
  • [3] Comparative efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation on cognition function in patients with mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Liu, Hong
    Wu, Mengyuan
    Huang, Haoyu
    Chen, Xiaolin
    Zeng, Peiling
    Xu, Ying
    AGEING RESEARCH REVIEWS, 2024, 101
  • [4] The modulation effect of non-invasive brain stimulation on cognitive function in patients with mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Xu, Ying
    Qiu, Zhijie
    Zhu, Jingfang
    Liu, Jiao
    Wu, Jingsong
    Tao, Jing
    Chen, Lidian
    BMC NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 20 (1)
  • [5] Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation on global cognition and neuropsychiatric symptoms in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment: A meta-analysis and systematic review
    Teselink, Johannes
    Bawa, Kritleen K.
    Koo, Grace K. Y.
    Sankhe, Krushnaa
    Liu, Celina S.
    Rapoport, Mark
    Oh, Paul
    Marzolini, Susan
    Gallagher, Damien
    Swardfager, Walter
    Herrmann, Nathan
    Lanctot, Krista L.
    AGEING RESEARCH REVIEWS, 2021, 72
  • [6] Non-invasive brain stimulation for patient with autism: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Annan
    Gong, Chao
    Wang, Bobo
    Sun, Jiaxing
    Jiang, Zhimei
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2023, 14
  • [7] Comparative efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation for post-stroke cognitive impairment: a network meta-analysis
    Yan, Mengyu
    Liu, Jiarui
    Guo, Yiming
    Hou, Qingtao
    Song, Jiaqi
    Wang, Xiaoqin
    Yu, Weihua
    Lue, Yang
    AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2024, 36 (01)
  • [8] Non-invasive brain stimulation in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Qi, Li
    Wang, Shaoyang
    Li, Xiaoming
    Yu, Yue
    Wang, Wenjia
    Li, Qianqian
    Tian, Yanghua
    Bai, Tongjian
    Wang, Kai
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2024, 178 : 378 - 387
  • [9] Effect of non-invasive brain stimulation on post-stroke cognitive impairment: a meta-analysis
    Zhao, Jing
    Meng, Qian
    Qi, Shuo
    Zhao, Hongfei
    Xia, Ling
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [10] Is it more effective for anhedonia and avolition? A systematic review and meta-analysis of non-invasive brain stimulation interventions for negative symptoms in schizophrenia
    Chen, Yuying
    Li, Zhuofeng
    Yan, Chao
    Zou, Laiquan
    CNS NEUROSCIENCE & THERAPEUTICS, 2024, 30 (03)