共 50 条
Can ChatGPT Provide Quality Information on Integrative Oncology? A Brief Report
被引:3
作者:
Lam, Chun Sing
[1
]
Hua, Rong
[1
]
Koon, Ho Kee
[2
]
Zhou, Keary Rui
[1
]
Lam, Teddy Tai Ning
[1
]
Lee, Chui Ping
[1
]
Lin, Wai Ling
[2
]
Wong, Cho Lee
[3
]
Lau, Yat Ming
[4
]
Loong, Herbert Ho-Fung
[5
]
Chung, Vincent Chi-Ho
[2
,6
]
Cheung, Yin Ting
[1
,7
]
机构:
[1] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Fac Med, Sch Pharm, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Sch Chinese Med, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Fac Med, Nethersole Sch Nursing, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] St Vincents Hosp, Kinghorn Canc Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, Sydney, Australia
[5] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Clin Oncol, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[6] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Fac Med, Jockey Club Sch Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[7] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Hong Kong Hub Paediat Excellence, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
来源:
JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
|
2024年
/
30卷
/
02期
关键词:
ChatGPT;
integrative oncology;
complementary medicine;
integrative medicine;
cancer;
artificial intelligence;
ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE USE;
COMPLEMENTARY;
CANCER;
D O I:
10.1089/jicm.2023.0290
中图分类号:
R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号:
10 ;
摘要:
This short report evaluated the accuracy and quality of information provided by ChatGPT regarding the use of complementary and integrative medicine for cancer. Using the QUality Evaluation Scoring Tool, a panel of 12 reviewers assessed ChatGPT's responses to 8 questions. The study found that ChatGPT provided moderate-quality responses that were relatively unbiased and not misleading. However, the chatbot's inability to reference specific scientific studies was a significant limitation. Patients with cancer should not rely on ChatGPT for clinical advice until further systematic validation. Future studies should examine how patients perceive ChatGPT's information and its impact on communication with health care professionals.
引用
收藏
页码:196 / 205
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条