The myth of aortic valve annulus changes in aortic valve disease

被引:0
|
作者
Peng, Yanren [1 ]
Hu, Huijun [2 ]
Shu, Xiaorong [1 ]
Lin, Yongqing [1 ]
Huang, Weibin [1 ]
Xu, Shuwan [1 ]
Nie, Ruqiong [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Mem Hosp, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Mem Hosp, Dept Radiol, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE | 2023年 / 10卷
关键词
aortic regurgitation; aortic stenosis; aortic annulus; computed tomography; transcatheter aortic valve replacement; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; REPLACEMENT; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ACCURACY; SYSTOLE;
D O I
10.3389/fcvm.2023.1302992
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe characteristics of aortic annulus changes in aortic regurgitation (AR) patients are poorly understood, and predictive factors among aortic valve disease are yet to be established.ObjectiveThis study seeks to elucidate the pattern of annular size fluctuations across different cardiac phases in AR patients and to identify predictors for annular enlargement during either systole or diastole in aortic valve diseases.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 55 patients with severe aortic valve diseases, including 26 patients with aortic stenosis (AS) and 29 with AR, to discern the two groups' contrasting and analogous patterns of annular changes. The patient sample was expanded to 107 to investigate the factors influencing the size of the annulus during different cardiac phases. Based on our findings, patients were then divided into two groups: those with an annulus that is larger during systole (83 patients) and those where the annulus is larger during diastole (24 patients).ResultsTypically, AR patients exhibit a dynamic annulus, with both perimeter and area being largest during mid-systole. These dimensions diminish progressively and then increase again in early diastole, a pattern consistent with observations in AS patients. Among 107 patients, 21% had diastolic enlargement. Systolic measurements would lead to prosthesis undersizing in 17% of these. Male gender and lower systolic annulus minimum relative to body surface area (AnMin index) were predictors of diastolic enlargement, with ROC curve areas of 0.70 and 0.87 for AR and AS, respectively.ConclusionsSystolic measurements are recommended for AR patients. Gender and the AnMin index are significant predictors, particularly potent in AS patients.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Role of Imaging in Aortic Valve Disease
    Everett R.J.
    Newby D.E.
    Jabbour A.
    Fayad Z.A.
    Dweck M.R.
    Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports, 2016, 9 (7)
  • [42] A larger aortic annulus causes aortic regurgitation and a smaller aortic annulus causes aortic stenosis in bicuspid aortic valve
    Sonoda, Makoto
    Takenaka, Katsu
    Uno, Kansei
    Ebihara, Aya
    Nagai, Ryozo
    ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY-A JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ULTRASOUND AND ALLIED TECHNIQUES, 2008, 25 (03): : 242 - 248
  • [43] Impact of Bicuspid Aortic Valve Morphology on Aortic Valve Disease and Aortic Dilation in Pediatric Patients
    Ward, Rebekah M.
    Marsh, Jordan M.
    Gossett, Jeffrey M.
    Rettiganti, Mallikarjuna R.
    Collins, R. Thomas, II
    PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 39 (03) : 509 - 517
  • [44] Feasibility and Accuracy of 3DTEE Versus CT for the Evaluation of Aortic Valve Annulus to Left Main Ostium Distance Before Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
    Tamborini, Gloria
    Fusini, Laura
    Gripari, Paola
    Muratori, Manuela
    Cefalu, Claudia
    Maffessanti, Francesco
    Alamanni, Francesco
    Bartorelli, Antonio
    Pontone, Gianluca
    Andreini, Daniele
    Bertella, Erika
    Fiorentini, Cesare
    Pepi, Mauro
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2012, 5 (06) : 579 - 588
  • [45] Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis and Small Aortic Annulus: Propensity-Matched Comparison to Standard Aortic Valve Replacement
    Dumont, Eric
    Doyle, Daniel
    Bagur, Rodrigo
    DeLaRochelliere, Robert
    Kalavrouziotis, Dimitri
    Pibarot, Philipppe
    Rodes-Cabau, Josep
    CIRCULATION, 2011, 124 (21)
  • [46] The Sievers Classification of the Bicuspid Aortic Valve for the Perioperative Echocardiographer: The Importance of Valve Phenotype for Aortic Valve Repair in the Era of the Functional Aortic Annulus
    Ridley, Clare H.
    Vallabhajosyula, Prashanth
    Bavaria, Joseph E.
    Patel, Prakash A.
    Gutsche, Jacob T.
    Shah, Ronak
    Feinman, Jared W.
    Weiss, Stuart J.
    Augoustides, John G.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2016, 30 (04) : 1142 - 1151
  • [47] Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Pure Aortic Regurgitation in a Large and Noncalcified Annulus
    Orzalkiewicz, Mateusz
    Bruno, Antonio Giulio
    Taglieri, Nevio
    Ghetti, Gabriele
    Marrozzini, Cinzia
    Galie, Nazzareno
    Palmerini, Tullio
    Saia, Francesco
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2021, 14 (19) : E271 - E273
  • [48] Aortic annulus rupture during transcatheter aortic valve implantation: safe aortic root replacement
    Eker, Armand
    Sozzi, Fabiola B.
    Civaia, Filippo
    Bourlon, Francois
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2012, 41 (05) : 1205 - 1205
  • [49] Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for Bioprosthetic Valve Failure: Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves 3 Aortic Valve-in-Valve Study
    Malaisrie, S. Chris
    Zajarias, Alan
    Leon, Martin B.
    Mack, Michael J.
    Pibarot, Philippe
    Hahn, Rebecca T.
    Brown, David
    Wong, S. Chiu
    Oldemeyer, J. Bradley
    Shang, Kan
    Leipsic, Jonathon
    Blanke, Philipp
    Guerrero, Mayra
    STRUCTURAL HEART-THE JOURNAL OF THE HEART TEAM, 2022, 6 (06):
  • [50] Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Imaging Techniques for Aortic Root Sizing
    Wichmann, Julian L.
    Varga-Szemes, Akos
    Suranyi, Pal
    Bayer, Richard R., II
    Litwin, Sheldon E.
    De Cecco, Carlo N.
    Mangold, Stefanie
    Muscogiuri, Giuseppe
    Fuller, Stephen R.
    Vogl, Thomas J.
    Steinberg, Daniel H.
    Schoepf, U. Joseph
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC IMAGING, 2015, 30 (06) : 349 - 358