Communication Between Pregnant People of Color and Prenatal Care Providers in the United States: An Integrative Review

被引:5
作者
Goh, Amy H. [1 ]
Altman, Molly R. [2 ]
Canty, Lucinda [3 ]
Edmonds, Joyce K. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Boston Coll, Boston Coll Connell Sch Nursing, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Sch Nursing, Seattle, WA USA
[3] Univ Massachusetts Amherst, Coll Nursing, Amherst, MA USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA USA
关键词
professional-patient relations; health communication; patient-centered care; prenatal care; health equity; congruent care; AFRICAN-AMERICAN WOMEN; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; HEALTH-CARE; LOW-INCOME; PERINATAL-CARE; STRUCTURAL RACISM; MATERNITY CARE; PERSPECTIVES; PERCEPTIONS; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1111/jmwh.13580
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
IntroductionRacism and discrimination negatively affect patient-provider communication. Yet, pregnant people of color consistently report being discriminated against, disrespected, and ignored. The purpose of this integrated review was to identify studies that examined communication between pregnant people of color and their prenatal care providers and evaluate the factors and outcomes arising from communication.MethodsWe searched the PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and PsychINFO databases for studies published between 2001 and 2023. Articles were eligible for inclusion if they reported on primary research conducted in the United States, were written in English, and focused on patient-provider communication with a sample that included pregnant people of color, defined as those who self-identified as Black, African American, Hispanic, Latina/x/e, Indigenous, American Indian, Asian, Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and/or Pacific Islander American. Twenty-six articles were included in the review. Relevant data were extracted and compiled into an evidence table. We then applied the rating scale of the Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice model to assess the level of evidence and quality of the studies. Themes were identified using a memoing technique and organized into 3 a priori categories: factors, outcomes, and recommendations.ResultsTwo overarching themes emerged from our analysis: racism/discrimination and unmet information needs. Subthemes were then identified as factors, outcomes, or recommendations. Factors included provider behaviors, language barriers, structural barriers, provider type, continuity of care, and fear. Outcome themes were disrespect, trust, decision-making power, missed appointments, and satisfaction with care. Lastly, culturally congruent care, provider training, and workforce development were categorized as recommendations.DiscussionInadequate communication between prenatal care providers and pregnant people of color continues to exist. Improving access to midwifery education for people of color can contribute to delivering perinatal care that is culturally and linguistically aligned. Further research about digital prenatal health communication is necessary to ensure equitable prenatal care.
引用
收藏
页码:202 / 223
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Factors influencing birth setting decision making in the United States: An integrative review
    George, Erin K.
    Shorten, Allison
    Lyons, Karen S.
    Edmonds, Joyce K.
    BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2022, 49 (03): : 403 - 419
  • [32] Associations between safety outcomes and communication practices among pediatric nurses in the United States
    Gampetro, Pamela J.
    Segvich, John P.
    Hughes, Ashley M.
    Kanich, Chris
    Schlaeger, Judith M.
    McFarlin, Barbara L.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC NURSING-NURSING CARE OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, 2022, 63 : 20 - 27
  • [33] Factors Associated With First-Trimester Prenatal Care Initiation In The United States: A Scoping Review
    Eggen, Melissa B.
    Lapreze, Dani
    Karimi, Seyed
    Creel, Liza
    Little, Bertis
    Ibrahim, Bridget Basile
    JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2024, : 259 - 269
  • [34] Use of Cancer Survivorship Care Guidelines by Primary Care Providers in the United States
    Townsend, Julie S.
    Rohan, Elizabeth A.
    Sabatino, Susan A.
    Puckett, Mary
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2023, 36 (05) : 789 - 802
  • [35] Just between Us: An Integrative Review of Confidential Care for Adolescents
    Baldridge, Stacy
    Symes, Lene
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC HEALTH CARE, 2018, 32 (02) : E45 - E58
  • [36] The impact of COVID-19 on prenatal care in the United States: Qualitative analysis from a survey of 2519 pregnant women
    Javaid, Sarah
    Barringer, Sarah
    Compton, Sarah D.
    Kaselitz, Elizabeth
    Muzik, Maria
    Moyer, Cheryl A.
    MIDWIFERY, 2021, 98
  • [37] Midwifery Care and Patient–Provider Communication in Maternity Decisions in the United States
    Katy B. Kozhimannil
    Laura B. Attanasio
    Y. Tony Yang
    Melissa D. Avery
    Eugene Declercq
    Maternal and Child Health Journal, 2015, 19 : 1608 - 1615
  • [38] A Review of Miscarriage and Healthcare Communication in the United States
    Lacci-Reilly, Kandice R.
    Brunner Huber, Larissa R.
    Quinlan, Margaret M.
    Hutchison, Charles B.
    Hopper, Lorenzo N.
    HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2024, 39 (09) : 1847 - 1854
  • [39] Patient-Centered Care for People with Depression and Anxiety: An Integrative Review Protocol
    de Pinho, Lara Guedes
    Correia, Tania
    Lopes, Manuel Jose
    Fonseca, Cesar
    Marques, Maria do Ceu
    Sampaio, Francisco
    do Arco, Helena Reis
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2021, 11 (05):
  • [40] Engaging patients and families in communication across transitions of care: an integrative review protocol
    Bucknall, Tracey K.
    Hutchinson, Alison M.
    Botti, Mari
    McTier, Lauren
    Rawson, Helen
    Hewitt, Nicky A.
    McMurray, Anne
    Marshall, Andrea P.
    Gillespie, Brigid M.
    Chaboyer, Wendy
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2016, 72 (07) : 1689 - 1700