共 50 条
Communication Between Pregnant People of Color and Prenatal Care Providers in the United States: An Integrative Review
被引:5
|作者:
Goh, Amy H.
[1
]
Altman, Molly R.
[2
]
Canty, Lucinda
[3
]
Edmonds, Joyce K.
[1
,4
]
机构:
[1] Boston Coll, Boston Coll Connell Sch Nursing, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Sch Nursing, Seattle, WA USA
[3] Univ Massachusetts Amherst, Coll Nursing, Amherst, MA USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA USA
关键词:
professional-patient relations;
health communication;
patient-centered care;
prenatal care;
health equity;
congruent care;
AFRICAN-AMERICAN WOMEN;
PATIENT-CENTERED CARE;
HEALTH-CARE;
LOW-INCOME;
PERINATAL-CARE;
STRUCTURAL RACISM;
MATERNITY CARE;
PERSPECTIVES;
PERCEPTIONS;
QUALITY;
D O I:
10.1111/jmwh.13580
中图分类号:
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号:
1011 ;
摘要:
IntroductionRacism and discrimination negatively affect patient-provider communication. Yet, pregnant people of color consistently report being discriminated against, disrespected, and ignored. The purpose of this integrated review was to identify studies that examined communication between pregnant people of color and their prenatal care providers and evaluate the factors and outcomes arising from communication.MethodsWe searched the PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and PsychINFO databases for studies published between 2001 and 2023. Articles were eligible for inclusion if they reported on primary research conducted in the United States, were written in English, and focused on patient-provider communication with a sample that included pregnant people of color, defined as those who self-identified as Black, African American, Hispanic, Latina/x/e, Indigenous, American Indian, Asian, Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and/or Pacific Islander American. Twenty-six articles were included in the review. Relevant data were extracted and compiled into an evidence table. We then applied the rating scale of the Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice model to assess the level of evidence and quality of the studies. Themes were identified using a memoing technique and organized into 3 a priori categories: factors, outcomes, and recommendations.ResultsTwo overarching themes emerged from our analysis: racism/discrimination and unmet information needs. Subthemes were then identified as factors, outcomes, or recommendations. Factors included provider behaviors, language barriers, structural barriers, provider type, continuity of care, and fear. Outcome themes were disrespect, trust, decision-making power, missed appointments, and satisfaction with care. Lastly, culturally congruent care, provider training, and workforce development were categorized as recommendations.DiscussionInadequate communication between prenatal care providers and pregnant people of color continues to exist. Improving access to midwifery education for people of color can contribute to delivering perinatal care that is culturally and linguistically aligned. Further research about digital prenatal health communication is necessary to ensure equitable prenatal care.
引用
收藏
页码:202 / 223
页数:22
相关论文