Comparison of Tracheal Intubation Using King Vision (Non-channeled Blade) and Tuoren Video Laryngoscopes in Patients With Cervical Spine Immobilization by Manual In-Line Stabilization: A Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:1
作者
Ramesh, Killo [1 ]
Srinivasan, Gnanasekaran [1 ]
Bidkar, Prasanna U. [1 ]
机构
[1] Jawaharlal Inst Postgrad Med Educ & Res, Anesthesiol & Crit Care, Pondicherry, India
关键词
intubation difficulty score; intubation time; glottic visualization; mils; video laryngoscope; MACINTOSH LARYNGOSCOPES; CHANNELED BLADE; AIRWAY; VISUALIZATION; PERCENTAGE; SCORE;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.43471
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Glottic visualization on cervical immobilization with manual in-line stabilization (MILS) might be challenging in individuals with cervical spine injuries. We compared non-channeled King Vision video laryngoscope (VL) (Ambu GmbH, Bad Nauheim, Germany) with Tuoren video laryngoscope (Henan Tuoren Medical Device, Zhengzhou, China) for endotracheal intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilization. Methods: A total of 124 patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia were included in this study. After induction of general anesthesia, patients were randomized into two groups (62 each): group K (non-channeled blade of King Vision video laryngoscope) and group T (Tuoren video laryngoscope). Cervical spine immobilization was achieved with manual in-line stabilization. The success of the first pass intubation, the time required to intubate, glottic visualization, and intubation difficulty score (IDS) were recorded. Results: The first-attempt success rate of intubation was 95.2% (59 out of 62 patients) in group K and 90.3% (56 out of 62 patients) in group T, which were comparable. The mean glottic visualization time was significantly less with group T (12.74 & PLUSMN; 6.32 seconds) compared to group K (17.92 & PLUSMN; 4.24 seconds). Intubation time was significantly faster with group K (18.79 & PLUSMN; 5.857 seconds) compared to group T (27.21 & PLUSMN; 8.514 seconds). Both video laryngoscopes provided good grades of glottic visualization. Conclusions: We conclude that the performance of the Tuoren video laryngoscope is similar to the King Vision video laryngoscope in terms of first-attempt intubation success rate and glottic visualization score in patients with cervical spine immobilization by manual in-line stabilization. Although glottic visualization time was shorter with Tuoren VL, we could achieve faster intubation with King Vision VL.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] The intubation difficulty scale (IDS) - Proposal and evaluation of a new score characterizing the complexity of endotracheal intubation
    Adnet, F
    Borron, SW
    Racine, SX
    Clemessy, JL
    Fournier, JL
    Plaisance, P
    Lapandry, C
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1997, 87 (06) : 1290 - 1297
  • [2] Akbar Shahir H M, 2015, Middle East J Anaesthesiol, V23, P43
  • [3] Ali QE, 2017, SRI LANKAN J ANAESTH, V25, P70, DOI 10.4038/slja.v25i2.8200
  • [4] Austin Naola, 2014, Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci, V4, P50, DOI 10.4103/2229-5151.128013
  • [5] Cervical spine motion during tracheal intubation with King Vision™ video laryngoscopy and conventional laryngoscopy: a crossover randomized study
    El-Tahan, Mohamed R.
    El Kenany, Samah
    Khidr, Alaa M.
    Al Ghamdi, Abdulmohsen A.
    Tawfik, Ahmed M.
    Al Mulhim, Abdullah S.
    [J]. MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2017, 83 (11) : 1152 - 1160
  • [6] Gulati S., 2022, Bali J Anesthesiol, V6, P108
  • [7] Comparison of KingVision videolaryngoscope channelled blade with Tuoren videolaryngoscope non-channelled blade in a simulated COVID-19 intubation scenario by non-anaesthesiologists and experienced anaesthesiologists: A prospective randomised crossover mannequin study
    Gupta, Anju
    Trikha, Anjan
    Ayub, Arshad
    Bhattacharjee, Sulagna
    Aravindan, Ajisha
    Gupta, Nishkarsh
    Prakash, Kelika
    Aggarwal, Richa
    Ganesh, Venkata
    Soni, Kapil Dev
    Malhotra, Rajeev Kumar
    [J]. TRENDS IN ANAESTHESIA AND CRITICAL CARE, 2021, 38 : 42 - 48
  • [8] Hafiizhoh Nur A. H., 2014, Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology, V22, P399
  • [9] Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing tracheal intubation
    Hansel, Jan
    Rogers, Andrew M.
    Lewis, Sharon R.
    Cook, Tim M.
    Smith, Andrew F.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2022, (04):
  • [10] CERVICAL-SPINE MOVEMENT DURING LARYNGOSCOPY WITH THE BULLARD, MACINTOSH, AND MILLER LARYNGOSCOPES
    HASTINGS, RH
    VIGIL, AC
    HANNA, R
    YANG, BY
    SARTORIS, DJ
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1995, 82 (04) : 859 - 869