Dishonesty as a collective-risk social dilemma

被引:0
|
作者
Jiang, Shuguang [1 ]
Villeval, Marie Claire [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Ctr Econ Res, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Lyon, CNRS, GATE, UMR 5824, Ecully, France
[3] Univ Lyon, CNRS, GATE, UMR 5824, 93 Chemindes Mouilles, F-69130 Ecully, France
关键词
collective risk; dishonesty; experiment; group size; individualism; public bad; GROUP-SIZE; PUBLIC-GOODS; INDIVIDUALISM-COLLECTIVISM; COOPERATION; PROVISION; POWER; POLITICIANS; PREFERENCES; DECEPTION; DIFFUSION;
D O I
10.1111/ecin.13171
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We investigated lying as a collective-risk social dilemma. Misreporting resulted in increased individual earnings but when total claims reached a certain threshold, all group members were at risk of collective sanction, regardless of their individual behavior. Due to selfishness and miscoordination, most individuals earned less than the reservation payoff from honest reporting in the group. However, preferences for truth-telling lowered the risk of collective sanction in this setting compared to a social dilemma game in which players could make direct claims without lying. The risk of sanctions decreased with risk aversion and a smaller group size.
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 241
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Social Networks and Collective Action
    Siegel, David A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2009, 53 (01) : 122 - 138
  • [22] Collective risk social dilemma and the consequences of the US withdrawal from international climate negotiations
    Smirnov, Oleg
    JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL POLITICS, 2019, 31 (04) : 660 - 676
  • [23] Crosscutting circles in a social dilemma: Effects of social identity and inequality on cooperation
    Aksoy, Ozan
    SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2019, 82 : 148 - 163
  • [24] Modeling Decisions in Collective Risk Social Dilemma Games for Climate Change Using Reinforcement Learning
    Kumar, Medha
    Agrawal, Kapil
    Dutt, Varun
    2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COGNITIVE AND COMPUTATIONAL ASPECTS OF SITUATION MANAGEMENT (COGSIMA), 2019, : 26 - 33
  • [25] Context Effects in a Negatively Framed Social Dilemma Experiment
    Messer, Kent D.
    Suter, Jordan F.
    Yan, Jubo
    ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2013, 55 (03) : 387 - 405
  • [26] Nonlinear social evolution and the emergence of collective action
    Allen, Benjamin
    Khwaja, Abdur-Rahman
    Donahue, James L.
    Kelly, Theodore J.
    Hyacinthe, Sasha R.
    Proulx, Jacob
    Lattanzio, Cassidy
    Dementieva, Yulia A.
    Sample, Christine
    PNAS NEXUS, 2024, 3 (04):
  • [27] Dishonesty and risk-taking: Compliance decisions of individuals and groups
    Fochmann, Martin
    Fochmann, Nadja
    Kocher, Martin G.
    Mueller, Nadja
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2021, 185 : 250 - 286
  • [28] The chronology of collective cheating: a qualitative study of collective dishonesty in academic contexts
    Cinzia Zanetti
    Fabrizio Butera
    Current Psychology, 2023, 42 : 27983 - 27997
  • [29] The chronology of collective cheating: a qualitative study of collective dishonesty in academic contexts
    Zanetti, Cinzia
    Butera, Fabrizio
    CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 42 (32) : 27983 - 27997
  • [30] Considering weed management as a social dilemma bridges individual and collective interests
    Bagavathiannan, Muthukumar, V
    Graham, Sonia
    Ma, Zhao
    Barney, Jacob N.
    Coutts, Shaun R.
    Caicedo, Ana L.
    De Clerck-Floate, Rosemarie
    West, Natalie M.
    Blank, Lior
    Metcalf, Alexander L.
    Lacoste, Myrtille
    Moreno, Carlo R.
    Evans, Jeffrey A.
    Burke, Ian
    Beckie, Hugh
    NATURE PLANTS, 2019, 5 (04) : 343 - 351