Corneal Biomechanics After SMILE, Femtosecond-Assisted LASIK, and Photorefractive Keratectomy: A Matched Comparison Study

被引:12
作者
Hashemi, Hassan [1 ]
Roberts, Cynthia J. [2 ]
Elsheikh, Ahmed [3 ,6 ]
Mehravaran, Shiva [7 ]
Panahi, Parsa [8 ]
Asgari, Soheila [1 ,4 ,5 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Noor Eye Hosp, Noor Ophthalmol Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Dept Biomed Engn, Columbus, OH USA
[3] Univ Liverpool, Sch Engn, Liverpool, England
[4] Moorfields Eye Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Natl Inst Hlth Res NIHR Biomed Res Ctr Ophthalmol, London, England
[5] UCL Inst Ophthalmol, London, England
[6] Beihang Univ, Beijing Adv Innovat Ctr Biomed Engn, Beijing, Peoples R China
[7] Morgan State Univ, Sch Comp Math & Nat Sci, Baltimore, MD USA
[8] Noor Eye Hosp, Noor Res Ctr Ophthalm Epidemiol, Tehran, Iran
[9] Noor Eye Hosp, Noor Ophthalmol Res Ctr, 96 Esfandiar Blvd,Valiasr Ave POB 347519395, Tehran, Iran
来源
TRANSLATIONAL VISION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY | 2023年 / 12卷 / 03期
关键词
corneal stiffness; small incision lenticule extraction; femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis; photorefractive keratectomy; matched comparison study; INCISION LENTICULE EXTRACTION; IN-SITU KERATOMILEUSIS; REFRACTIVE SURGERY; INTRAOCULAR-PRESSURE; NONCONTACT TONOMETRY; RESPONSE PARAMETERS; MYOPIA;
D O I
10.1167/tvst.12.3.12
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the change in corneal stiffness after small incision lenticule extrac-tion (SMILE), femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK), and photore-fractive keratectomy (PRK). Methods: Age, gender, spherical equivalent, and central corneal thickness (CCT)- matched cases undergoing SMILE with a 120-& mu; cap, FS-LASIK with a 110-& mu; flap, and PRK were enrolled. One-year change in the stress-strain index, stiffness parameter at first applanation, integrated inverse radius, deformation amplitude ratio at 2 mm, and defor-mation amplitude ratio at 1 mm were compared between the surgical groups by linear mixed-effect models. Results: Within each surgical group, 120 eyes completed 1 year of follow-up. The resid-ual stromal bed (RSB) thickness and (RSB/CCTpostop) were 348.1 & PLUSMN; 35.0 (0.74), 375.4 & PLUSMN; 31.0 (0.77) and 426.7 & PLUSMN; 2 & mu;m (0.88) after SMILE, FS-LASIK, and PRK, respectively. The 1-year change in all biomechanical indices was significant, except the stress-strain index with PRK (P = 0.884). The change in all indices with SMILE were significantly greater than with FS-LASIK and with PRK (all P < 0.01), except the deformation amplitude ratio at 1 mm change between SMILE and FS-LASIK (P = 0.075). The changes in all indices with FS-LASIK were significantly greater than with PRK (all P < 0.05). Conclusions: Although SMILE preserves the greatest amount of anterior cornea with a cap thickness of 120 & mu;, this also produces the smallest RSB and the greatest decrease in stiffness. Thus, the RSB is shown to be the predominant determinant of stiffness decreases, rather than the preserved anterior cornea. We recommend using a thinner cap to achieve a thicker RSB and a lesser decrease in the corneal stiffness in the SMILE procedure. Translational Relevance: After refractive surgery, RSB is predominant determinant of stiffness decreases, rather than the preserved anterior cornea.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Dynamic ultra high speed Scheimpflug imaging for assessing corneal biomechanical properties
    Ambrosio, Renato, Jr.
    Ramos, Isaac
    Luz, Allan
    Faria, Fernando Correa
    Steinmueller, Andreas
    Krug, Matthias
    Belin, Michael W.
    Roberts, Cynthia Jane
    [J]. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE OFTALMOLOGIA, 2013, 72 (02) : 99 - 102
  • [2] Balidis M, 2019, ACTA OPHTHALMOL, V97, pS263
  • [3] Corneal Biomechanical Assessment with Ultra-High-Speed Scheimpflug Imaging During Non-Contact Tonometry: A Prospective Review
    Baptista, Pedro Manuel
    Ambrosio Jr, Renato
    Oliveira, Luis
    Meneres, Pedro
    Beirao, Joao Melo
    [J]. CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 15 : 1409 - 1423
  • [4] Review of Corneal Biomechanical Properties Following LASIK and SMILE for Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism
    Damgaard, Iben Bach
    Reffat, Mohamed
    Hjortdal, Jesper
    [J]. OPEN OPHTHALMOLOGY JOURNAL, 2018, 12 : 164 - 174
  • [5] Biomechanics and wound healing in the cornea
    Dupps, William J., Jr.
    Wilson, Steven E.
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL EYE RESEARCH, 2006, 83 (04) : 709 - 720
  • [6] Determination of Corneal Biomechanical Behavior in-vivo for Healthy Eyes Using CorVis ST Tonometry: Stress-Strain Index
    Eliasy, Ashkan
    Chen, Kai-Jung
    Vinciguerra, Riccardo
    Lopes, Bernardo T.
    Abass, Ahmed
    Vinciguerra, Paolo
    Ambrosio, Renato, Jr.
    Roberts, Cynthia J.
    Elsheikh, Ahmed
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN BIOENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2019, 7 (MAY)
  • [7] Corneal biomechanical properties after SMILE versus FLEX, LASIK, LASEK, or PRK: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Guo, Hui
    Hosseini-Moghaddam, Seyed M.
    Hodge, William
    [J]. BMC OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [8] Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanics After Excimer Laser Corneal Refractive Surgery in High Myopic Patients Using Dynamic Scheimpflug Technology
    Hashemi, Hassan
    Asgari, Soheila
    Mortazavi, Mahdi
    Ghaffari, Reza
    [J]. EYE & CONTACT LENS-SCIENCE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2017, 43 (06): : 371 - 377
  • [9] Assessment of corneal biomechanical parameters in healthy and keratoconic eyes using dynamic bidirectional applanation device and dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer
    Herber, Robert
    Ramm, Lisa
    Spoerl, Eberhard
    Raiskup, Frederik
    Pillunat, Lutz E.
    Terai, Naim
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 45 (06) : 778 - 788
  • [10] Risk factors for postlaser refractive surgery corneal ectasia
    Jin, Sierra X.
    Dackowski, Evan
    Chuck, Roy S.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 31 (04) : 288 - 292