Sensitivity and Calibration of Three-Dimensional SPH Formulations in Large-Scale Landslide Modeling

被引:4
作者
Li, Shuai [1 ,2 ]
Tang, Hui [2 ]
Peng, Chong [3 ]
Turowski, Jens M. [4 ]
Schoepa, Anne [4 ]
An, Huicong [1 ]
Chen, Xiaoqing [1 ]
Ouyang, Chaojun [1 ]
Chen, Jiangang [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Mt Hazards & Environm, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] German Res Ctr Geosci GFZ, Sect Earth Surface Proc Modelling 4 7, Potsdam, Germany
[3] ESS Engn Software Steyr GmbH, Steyr, Austria
[4] German Res Ctr Geosci GFZ, Sect Geomorphol 4 6, Potsdam, Germany
关键词
landslides; numerical modeling; constitutive model; model calibration routines; friction; cohesion; SMOOTHED PARTICLE HYDRODYNAMICS; 2017 XINMO LANDSLIDE; DEBRIS-FLOW; LARGE-DEFORMATION; RUNOUT ANALYSIS; JINSHA RIVER; MOBILITY; FAILURE; DYNAMICS; SOLVER;
D O I
10.1029/2022JB024583
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Numerical prediction of landslide runout and deposition is important for estimating landslide risk and developing mitigation plans. The choice of a suitable model and its parameters and a confident calibration strategy are crucial for numerical simulations. Here, we evaluated two constitutive models with a three-dimensional smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) method by simulating the catastrophic 11 October 2018 Baige landslide. The results indicate that both the soil mechanic and fluid models can capture the dynamic runout and deposition morphology while using different values of input parameters. A point-wise comparison of deposit elevation can minimize the calibration error. Numerical models were constrained accurately by utilizing both the static observation data and dynamic seismic signals. The effects of friction on deep-seated landslides motion and deposition are more significant than cohesion. The 3D model includes the effects of shear stresses and velocities inside the material body, resulting in a reduced friction coefficient compared to the 2D model (e.g., depth-averaged model). Our study highlights the potential of the 3D SPH method for modeling large-scale complex landslides.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 89 条
  • [1] Aaron J, 2017, THESIS U BRIT COLUMB
  • [2] Aaron J., 2018, LANDSLIDES ENG SLOPE, P285, DOI [10.1201/9781315375007-15, DOI 10.1201/9781315375007-15]
  • [3] Two methodologies to calibrate landslide runout models
    Aaron, Jordan
    McDougall, Scott
    Nolde, Natalia
    [J]. LANDSLIDES, 2019, 16 (05) : 907 - 920
  • [4] Extracting source characteristics and dynamics of the August 2010 Mount Meager landslide from broadband seismograms
    Allstadt, Kate
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-EARTH SURFACE, 2013, 118 (03) : 1472 - 1490
  • [5] Dynamic process analysis of the Baige landslide by the combination of DEM and long-period seismic waves
    An, Huicong
    Ouyang, Chaojun
    Zhou, Shu
    [J]. LANDSLIDES, 2021, 18 (05) : 1625 - 1639
  • [6] Modelling of landslides with the material-point method
    Andersen, S.
    Andersen, L.
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL GEOSCIENCES, 2010, 14 (01) : 137 - 147
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2007, P 2007 INT FOR LAND
  • [8] A multiresolution strategy for solving landslides using the Particle Finite Element Method
    Becker, Pablo A.
    Idelsohn, Sergio R.
    [J]. ACTA GEOTECHNICA, 2016, 11 (03) : 643 - 657
  • [9] Transferability of a calibrated numerical model of rock avalanche run-out: Application to 20 rock avalanches on the Nuussuaq Peninsula, West Greenland
    Benjamin, J.
    Rosser, N. J.
    Dunning, S. A.
    Hardy, R. J.
    Kelfoun, K.
    Szczucinski, W.
    [J]. EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS, 2018, 43 (15) : 3057 - 3073
  • [10] Brodsky EE, 2003, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V30, DOI [10.1029/2003GL018485, 10.1029/2003GL018]