Measuring farm productivity under production uncertainty

被引:1
作者
Sidhoum, Amer Ait [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Nat Resources Inst Finland Luke, Business Econ, Helsinki, Finland
[2] Nat Resources Inst Finland Luke, Business Econ, Latokartanonkaari 9, FI-00790 Helsinki, Finland
关键词
agricultural productivity; data envelopment analysis; state-contingent framework; uncertainty modelling; TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY; AGRICULTURE; GROWTH; INDEX; OUTPUT; RISK;
D O I
10.1111/1467-8489.12520
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
This research introduces a novel empirical application to the assessment of farm productivity growth. While the existing research on productivity change has primarily focussed on ex post output observations, it has been shown that ignoring production uncertainty can lead to unreliable results. Using a state-contingent framework to represent the stochastic production environment, we extend the recent line of research that merged the state-contingent approach and efficiency measurement to productivity change using the Malmquist and Luenberger productivity indices. Using a balanced panel of 117 arable crop farms surveyed in 2011 and 2015, we show through the study results that productivity decreased, with technological regress being the major source of productivity change. Differences in productivity change between nonstochastic and stochastic modelling show the relevance to consider the state-contingent framework when assessing farms' productivity.
引用
收藏
页码:672 / 687
页数:16
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Valuing social sustainability in agriculture: An approach based on social outputs' shadow prices [J].
Ait Sidhoum, Amer .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 203 :273-286
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Production Frontiers
[3]  
Antle J.M., 1983, Journal of Business Economic Statistics, V1, P192, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.1983.10509339, DOI 10.1080/07350015.1983.10509339]
[4]   A new slacks-based measure of Malmquist-Luenberger index in the presence of undesirable outputs [J].
Arabi, Behrouz ;
Munisamy, Susila ;
Emrouznejad, Ali .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2015, 51 :29-37
[5]  
Arrow K., 1953, CAHIERS SEMINAIR EC
[6]   The super-efficiency procedure for outlier identification, not for ranking efficient units [J].
Banker, Rajiv D. ;
Chang, Hsihul .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2006, 175 (02) :1311-1320
[7]  
Boussemart J.P., 2003, Bulletin of Economic Research, Bulletin of Economic Research, V55, P391, DOI [10.1111/1467-8586.00183, DOI 10.1111/1467-8586.00183]
[8]   A COMPARISON OF 3 NONPARAMETRIC MEASURES OF PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH IN EUROPEAN AND UNITED-STATES AGRICULTURE [J].
BUREAU, JC ;
FARE, R ;
GROSSKOPF, S .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1995, 46 (03) :309-326
[9]   THE ECONOMIC-THEORY OF INDEX NUMBERS AND THE MEASUREMENT OF INPUT, OUTPUT, AND PRODUCTIVITY [J].
CAVES, DW ;
CHRISTENSEN, LR ;
DIEWERT, WE .
ECONOMETRICA, 1982, 50 (06) :1393-1414
[10]  
Chambers R.G., 1996, NEW LOOK INPUT OUTPU, P5