The Comparison of Functional Outcomes in Patients With Unilateral or Bilateral Intracapsular Mandibular Condylar Fractures After Closed or Open Treatment A 10-Year Retrospective Study

被引:1
|
作者
Lai, Bo-Ru [1 ]
Liao, Han-Tsung [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Mem Hosp Keelung, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Keelung, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Div Trauma Plast Surg, Linkou, Taiwan
[3] Craniofacial Res Ctr, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[4] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[5] Xiamen Chang Gung Hosp, Dept Plast Surg, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[6] Chang Gung Univ, Chang Gung Mem Hosp Linkou, Craniofacial Res Ctr, Coll Med,Div Trauma Plast Surg, 5 Fu Shing St, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
关键词
condylar head fracture; closed reduction; open reduction and internal fixation; intracapsular condylar fractures; HEAD FRACTURES; OPEN REDUCTION; NONSURGICAL TREATMENT; INTERNAL-FIXATION; CLASSIFICATION; METAANALYSIS; MULTICENTER; MANAGEMENT; PATTERN; TRISMUS;
D O I
10.1097/SAP.0000000000003346
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThe treatment strategies for mandibular condylar head fractures, also known as intracapsular condylar fractures (ICFs), have not been concluded. We humbly present our treatment outcomes and share our experience in our department.Aims and ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to compare the functional outcomes between closed reduction (CR) and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for management of unilateral or bilateral ICFs.Materials and MethodsThis 10-year retrospective cohort study included 71 patients with 102 ICFs who were treated in our department from May 2007 to August 2017. Nine patients mixed with extracapsular fractures were excluded; thus, 62 patients with 93 ICFs were included. All patients received treatment by the senior surgeon in Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch, Taiwan. The patient's basic data, fracture morphologies, associated injuries, managements, complications, and maximal mouth opening (MMO) measurement at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperative were reviewed for analysis.ResultsAmong the 93 fractures, 31 (50%) were bilateral and 31 were unilateral (50%). Based on He ' s classification, 45 (48%) had type A fracture, 13 (14%) had type B, 5 (5%) had type C, 20 (22%) had type M, and 10 (11%) had no displacement. Maximal mouth opening of 37 mm in unilateral cases after 6 months was significantly higher than the 33-mm MMO in bilateral cases. In addition, the MMO in the ORIF group was significantly higher than that of the CR group in 3 months postoperative. Univariate (odds ratio, 4.92; P = 0.01) and multivariate (odds ratio, 4.76; P = 0.027) analyses revealed CR as an independent risk factor for trismus development compared with ORIF. Malocclusion was observed in 5 patients in both CR and ORIF groups. In addition, 1 patient developed temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis in the CR group. No surgical-related temporary or permanent facial nerve palsy was observed.ConclusionsOpen reduction and internal fixation for condylar head fracture provided better recovery in MMO than CR, and the MMO recovery was less in bilateral condylar head fracture than unilateral condylar head fracture. Open reduction and internal fixation in ICFs have a lower risk for trismus development and should be the treatment of choice in selected cases.
引用
收藏
页码:S19 / S25
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Open versus closed treatment for unilateral mandibular extra-capsular condylar fractures: A meta-analysis
    Li, Jie
    Yang, Hongbin
    Han, Lin
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 47 (07) : 1110 - 1119
  • [2] Unilateral mandibular condylar process fractures: a retrospective clinical comparison of open versus closed treatment
    Stypulkowski, Renata Porto
    Santos, Aline Gama
    de Paula e Silva, Elvidio
    da Costa Moraes, Cicero Andre
    Santos da Rosa, Everton Luis
    ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY-HEIDELBERG, 2019, 23 (02): : 209 - 214
  • [3] The Radiographic and Functional Outcome of Bilateral Mandibular Condylar Head Fractures A Comparison Between Open and Closed Treatment
    Ho, Susan Yu-Chen
    Liao, Han-Tsung
    Chen, Chih-Hao
    Chen, Yi-Chieh
    Chen, Yu-Ray
    Chen, Chien-Tzung
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2015, 74 : S93 - S98
  • [4] Unilateral mandibular condylar process fractures: a retrospective clinical comparison of open versus closed treatment
    Renata Porto Stypulkowski
    Aline Gama Santos
    Elvidio de Paula e Silva
    Cícero André da Costa Moraes
    Everton Luis Santos da Rosa
    Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2019, 23 : 209 - 214
  • [5] Outcomes of functional treatment of condylar mandibular fractures with an articular impact: a retrospective study of 108 children
    Malinge, Mathilde
    Grimaud, Fanny
    Perrin, Jean-Philippe
    Loin, Justine
    Anquetil, Marine
    Mercier, Jacques
    Corre, Pierre
    Bertin, Helios
    JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2022, 123 (02) : 177 - 183
  • [6] Aetiology, pattern and treatment of mandibular condylar fractures in 549 patients: A 22-year retrospective study
    Zhou, Hai-Hua
    Liu, Qi
    Cheng, Gu
    Li, Zu-Bing
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2013, 41 (01) : 34 - 41
  • [7] Functional outcomes following surgical treatment of bilateral mandibular condylar fractures
    Chen, C.-T.
    Feng, C.-H.
    Tsay, P.-K.
    Lai, J.-P.
    Chen, Y.-R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2011, 40 (01) : 38 - 44
  • [8] The Operative Treatment of Ankle Fractures: A 10-Year Retrospective Study of 1529 Patients
    Fenelon, Christopher
    Galbraith, John G.
    Fahey, Tom
    Kearns, Stephen R.
    JOURNAL OF FOOT & ANKLE SURGERY, 2021, 60 (04) : 663 - 668
  • [9] Mandibular condylar fractures: a 5-year retrospective analysis comparing open versus closed reduction
    Thean, David
    Chang, Frank
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 94 (04) : 597 - 603
  • [10] Closed versus open treatment of mandibular condylar process fractures: A meta-analysis of retrospective and prospective studies
    Berner, Tanja
    Essig, Harald
    Schumann, Paul
    Blumer, Michael
    Lanzer, Martin
    Ruecker, Martin
    Gander, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 43 (08) : 1404 - 1408