Does geopolitical risk affect bilateral trade? Evidence from South Korea

被引:5
|
作者
Kim, Chi Yeol [1 ]
Jin, Hyungsuk [2 ]
机构
[1] Korea Maritime & Ocean Univ, Div Shipping Management, Busan, South Korea
[2] Korea Int Trade Assoc, Gwangju & Jeonnam Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Geopolitical risk; bilateral trade; Korean economy; INTERNATIONAL-TRADE; UNCERTAINTY SHOCKS; TERRORISM; CONFLICT; IMPACT; VOLATILITY; INVESTMENT; CHINA; TERMS; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1080/13547860.2023.2204693
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study examines the impact of geopolitical risk on international trade of South Korea. Given the economic and diplomatic environment surrounding the Korean Peninsula, it is likely that shocks from geopolitical events exert a significant impact on international trade of Korea. To this end, we employ popular indices of geopolitical risk developed and the dataset for international trade of Korea during 1991-2020 is used for multiple regression analysis. Furthermore, exchange of goods with 10 major trading partners is also investigated. It is found that a rise in geopolitical tension leads to the reduction in international trade of Korea. In addition, the negative impact of geopolitical risk varies by trading partners, which largely depends on the relative weight of each country. The findings in this study offer a policy implication that balancing between economic cooperation and diplomatic tie is critical for international trade of Korea.
引用
收藏
页码:1834 / 1853
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Does income inequality affect individual happiness? Evidence from Seoul, Korea
    Jin, Jangik
    Hong, Seong-Yun
    CITIES, 2022, 131
  • [42] Do Voters Reward Politicians for Trade Liberalization? Evidence from South Korea
    Kim, Sung Eun
    Cha, Sujin
    REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS, 2022, 17 (04): : 751 - 780
  • [43] Effects of exchange rates and invoiced currencies on trade: Evidence from South Korea
    Shimizu, Makoto
    Song, Joon-Heon
    WORLD ECONOMY, 2022, 45 (06): : 1997 - 2031
  • [44] Do Voters Reward Politicians for Trade Liberalization? Evidence from South Korea
    Sung Eun Kim
    Sujin Cha
    The Review of International Organizations, 2022, 17 : 751 - 780
  • [45] The Current Situation and Potential of China-South Korea Bilateral Trade
    Liu, Shuang
    2017 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PSYCHOLOGY, INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE (PIL 2017), 2017, 95 : 49 - 52
  • [46] Does geopolitical risk matter for corporate investment? Evidence from emerging countries in Asia
    Anh-Tuan Le
    Thao Phuong Tran
    JOURNAL OF MULTINATIONAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 62
  • [47] Does geopolitical risk alleviate the "sticky" cost behavior of firms? Evidence from India
    Srivastava, Samridhi
    Guruprasath, T.
    Das, Seshanwita
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEM ASSURANCE ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2024,
  • [48] Does geopolitical risk hinder sustainable development goals? Evidence from a panel analysis
    Nguyen, Dinh Trung
    Le, Thai Hong
    Do, Dinh Dinh
    Nguyen, Hai Nam
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 347
  • [49] Does geopolitical risk escalate environmental degradation in Turkey? Evidence from a Fourier approach
    Kizilkaya, Fatma
    Kizilkaya, Oktay
    Mike, Faruk
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024,
  • [50] Does trade openness andFDIreduce inequality? Evidence from South Asia
    Khan, Imran
    Nawaz, Zuhaba
    Bin Saeed, Bilal
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FINANCE & ECONOMICS, 2021, 26 (04) : 6459 - 6470