Closer in hard times? The drivers of European solidarity in 'normal' and 'crisis' times

被引:10
作者
Kyriazi, Anna [1 ]
Pellegata, Alessandro [1 ]
Ronchi, Stefano [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Dept Social & Polit Sci, Via Conservatorio 7, I-20122 Milan, Italy
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
European Union; Covid-19; crisis; Identity; Public opinion; Solidarity; Utility; PUBLIC SUPPORT; IDENTITY; INTEGRATION; PREFERENCES; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1057/s41295-023-00332-w
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
This article examines the trends and differences in predictors of public support for European Union (EU) fiscal solidarity using two individual surveys conducted in 2019 and 2020, before and during the first wave of the Covid-19 pandemic, in six Western European countries. We focus on individual self-interest and European/national identification as the two major determinants of public preference formation. Empirical analyses show that, while the average level of public support for European fiscal solidarity did not change from 2019 to 2020, the negative associations between exclusive national identification and economic vulnerability, on the one hand, and EU fiscal solidarity on the other were weakened. Among both, the identitarian source retained substantive (although reduced) relevance in 2020, while utility did not. Country-level analyses reveal a more complex picture, but the overall pattern holds across the member states included in our sample. We argue that the reduced explanatory power of these typical heuristics that individuals use to shape their attitudes towards European solidarity is connected to the nature of the pandemic as an exogenous 'common crisis', affecting all member states in a supposedly symmetric manner, at least in the first phase, and inducing interdependencies among them.
引用
收藏
页码:535 / 553
页数:19
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Banting Keith., 2017, The Strains of Commitment: The Political Sources of Solidarity in Diverse Societies, P1, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780198795452.001.0001
  • [2] Preferences for International Redistribution: The Divide over the Eurozone Bailouts
    Bechtel, Michael M.
    Hainmueller, Jens
    Margalit, Yotam
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2014, 58 (04) : 835 - 856
  • [3] Blyth Mark., 2002, GREAT TRANSFORMATION, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139087230
  • [4] Policymaking in the EU under crisis conditions: Covid and refugee crises compared
    Bojar, Abel
    Kriesi, Hanspeter
    [J]. COMPARATIVE EUROPEAN POLITICS, 2023, 21 (04) : 427 - 447
  • [5] Mapping EU attitudes: Conceptual and empirical dimensions of Euroscepticism and EU support
    Boomgaarden, Hajo G.
    Schuck, Andreas R. T.
    Elenbaas, Matthijs
    de Vreese, Claes H.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UNION POLITICS, 2011, 12 (02) : 241 - 266
  • [6] Beyond "identity"
    Brubaker, R
    Cooper, F
    [J]. THEORY AND SOCIETY, 2000, 29 (01) : 1 - 47
  • [7] Does the EU Need a Navel? Implicit and Explicit Identification with the European Union
    Cram, Laura
    [J]. JCMS-JOURNAL OF COMMON MARKET STUDIES, 2012, 50 (01) : 71 - 86
  • [8] Public support for European fiscal integration in times of crisis
    Daniele, Gianmarco
    Geys, Benny
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 2015, 22 (05) : 650 - 670
  • [9] The next generation EU: An analysis of the dimensions of conflict behind the deal
    de la Porte, Caroline
    Jensen, Mads Dagnis
    [J]. SOCIAL POLICY & ADMINISTRATION, 2021, 55 (02) : 388 - 402
  • [10] Donati N., 2021, EUROPEAN SOLIDARITY