More Than One Way to Pivot: The Case for Opportunity and Survival Pivots

被引:4
作者
Allen, Jared S. [1 ,5 ]
Combs, James G. [2 ]
Carr, Jon C. [3 ]
Michaelis, Timothy L. [4 ]
Joseph, Dana L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Texas Tech Univ, Lubbock, TX USA
[2] Univ Cent Florida, Orlando, FL USA
[3] North Carolina State Univ, Raleigh, NC USA
[4] Northern Illinois Univ, De Kalb, IL USA
[5] Texas Tech Univ, Rawls Coll Business, Dept Management, 703 Flint Ave, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
关键词
entrepreneurial/new venture strategy; entrepreneurial cognition/psychology; individual decision-making; STRATEGIC CHANGE; THREAT-RIGIDITY; ENTREPRENEURIAL FIRMS; DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES; PROSPECT-THEORY; MODELS; REORIENTATION; UNCERTAINTY; PERFORMANCE; RESOURCE;
D O I
10.1177/01492063241236763
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Research describes pivots as quick and comprehensive change in venture direction triggered by (external) opportunity-based information suggesting a better opportunity. We discovered two distinct pivot types in a qualitative study (Study 1), neither of which fully aligns with prior research. "Opportunity pivots" are triggered by opportunity-based information but are slower and less comprehensive than previously described; "survival pivots" are rapid and comprehensive but triggered by (internal) threat-based information. Lacking theory to explain our discoveries, we tested competing theories in an experimental vignette study involving 1,945 entrepreneurs (Study 2). We find that entrepreneurial learning explains opportunity but not survival pivots, and prospect theory explains survival but not opportunity pivots. The discovery of distinct pivot types provides a foundation for exploring additional pivoting variation; finding support for a different theoretical explanation for each pivot type suggests important limits to core theories used to explain pivoting.
引用
收藏
页码:1803 / 1833
页数:31
相关论文
共 95 条
[51]  
McCracken Grand., 1988, The Long Interview, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781412986229
[52]   Pivoting Isn't Enough? Managing Strategic Reorientation in New Ventures [J].
McDonald, Rory ;
Gao, Cheng .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2019, 30 (06) :1289-1318
[53]   Falling forward: Real options reasoning and entrepreneurial failure [J].
McGrath, RG .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1999, 24 (01) :13-30
[54]  
MCGRATH RG, 1995, HARVARD BUS REV, V73, P44
[55]   Trapped by the entrepreneurial mindset: Opportunity seeking and escalation of commitment in the Mount Everest disaster [J].
McMullen, Jeffery S. ;
Kier, Alexander S. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2016, 31 (06) :663-686
[56]   ADAPTING TO ENVIRONMENTAL JOLTS [J].
MEYER, AD .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1982, 27 (04) :515-537
[57]   A LONGITUDINAL-STUDY OF THE CORPORATE LIFE-CYCLE [J].
MILLER, D ;
FRIESEN, PH .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1984, 30 (10) :1161-1183
[58]   INNOVATION IN CONSERVATIVE AND ENTREPRENEURIAL FIRMS - 2 MODELS OF STRATEGIC MOMENTUM [J].
MILLER, D ;
FRIESEN, PH .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1982, 3 (01) :1-25
[59]   The evolution of strategic simplicity: Exploring two models of organizational adaption [J].
Miller, D ;
Lant, TK ;
Milliken, FJ ;
Korn, HJ .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1996, 22 (06) :863-887
[60]  
Minniti M., 2001, ENTREPRENEURISHIP TH, V25, P5, DOI [10.1177/104225870102500301, DOI 10.1177/104225870102500301]