Balancing environmental impact: A sustainability index analysis of sorghum production for food and feed

被引:0
作者
Prabowo, A. [1 ]
Hayati, R. N. [2 ]
Ludfiani, D. D. [1 ]
Minarsih, S. [3 ]
Haryanto, B. [1 ]
Supriyo, A. [3 ]
Subiharta, S. [2 ]
Nurwahyuni, E. [3 ]
Hindarwati, Y. [3 ]
Setiapermas, M. N. [3 ]
Sudarto, S. [4 ]
Samijan, S. [3 ]
Utomo, B. [5 ]
Winarni, E. [3 ]
Suretno, N. D. [1 ]
Wibawa, W. [4 ]
Agustini, S. [4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Res & Innovat Agcy, Res Ctr Sustainable Prod Syst & Life Cycle Assessm, Manado, Indonesia
[2] Natl Res & Innovat Agcy, Res Ctr Anim Husb, Manado, Indonesia
[3] Natl Res & Innovat Agcy, Res Ctr Food Crops, Manado, Indonesia
[4] Natl Res & Innovat Agcy, Res Ctr Hort & Estate Crops, Cibinong, Indonesia
[5] Natl Res & Innovat Agcy, Res Ctr Social Welf Village & Connect, Jakarta, Indonesia
来源
GLOBAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT-GJESM | 2024年 / 10卷 / 02期
关键词
Feed; Food; Multidimensional scaling; Sorghum; Sustainability; ETHANOL-PRODUCTION; DIGESTIBILITY;
D O I
10.22035/gjesm.2024.02.20
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Sorghum is a grain-producing commodity with the seeds being a food source, while the leaves, stems, and bran serve as animal feed. The productivity depends on the specific variety, environment, infrastructure, and technology used. Sorghum cultivation in Indonesia is carried out primarily using agroforestry or monoculture. Despite not being as popular compared to rice and corn due to the prevalence of these staples in Indonesian diets, sorghum has the potential to replace corn because its cultivation is easier and the results are more profitable. Therefore, this study aimed to determine sustainability index and potential of sorghum for food and feed by identifying dimensions and attributes that influence sustainability.METHODS: This study was conducted at Raji, Demak, Central Java, Indonesia in October 2023. Data were collected through focus group discussions and structural questionnaires consisting of 28 attributes associated with environmental, social, economic, and technological dimensions. Multidimensional scaling method and Rapfish software were used for data analysis. Monte Carlo analysis was used to ascertain sustainability level and attributes leverage, as well as check errors and variations in assessment.FINDINGS: The results showed that sustainability index of sorghum for food and feed was 79.67, categorized as very sustainable. Analysis across four dimensions showed that the social dimension had the highest (83.80) sustainability index, followed by the technological (82.28), economical (77.46), and environmental (75.15) dimensions. A total of 12 attributes were found to greatly affect sustainability. These included land availability, the efficiency of water used, the prevention of natural resource exploitation, motivation level, minimal interference with primary agricultural activities, community acceptance, productivity, sales profit level, ease of sale and cultivation, tools availability, and technological sensitivity. CONCLUSION: Sustainability index of sorghum for food and feed was categorized as very sustainable with a value of 79.67. This index consisted of the environmental (75.15), social (83.80), economical (77.46), and technological dimensions (82.28). The average productivity at the study site was 6-7 tons per hectare (tons/ha), with a production potency of 300-350 tons/year. Additionally, the potency of sorghum stover production was 471.8 ton per year of dry matter and could be used as feed for 163 animal units/year.
引用
收藏
页码:743 / 758
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] A resilience-sustainability coupling coordination analysis of the Chinese food production system
    Guo, Hongpeng
    Chen, Hongshan
    Pan, Chulin
    Xu, Shuang
    Lei, Qingyong
    Liu, Xiaoyan
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024,
  • [23] Technoeconomic analysis and environmental sustainability estimation of bioalcohol production from barley straw
    Kuittinen, Suvi
    Hietaharju, Jenna
    Bhattarai, Ira
    Hassan, Md. Kamrul
    Kupiainen, Laura
    Kangas, Jani
    Tanskanen, Juha
    Pappinen, Ari
    BIOCATALYSIS AND AGRICULTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2022, 43
  • [24] Comparative analysis of environmental impacts of agricultural production systems, agricultural input efficiency, and food choice
    Clark, Michael
    Tilman, David
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2017, 12 (06):
  • [25] Environmental impact assessment of different cropping systems of home-grown feed for milk production
    Zucali, Maddalena
    Bacenetti, Jacopo
    Tamburini, Alberto
    Nonini, Luca
    Sandrucci, Anna
    Bava, Luciana
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 172 : 3734 - 3746
  • [26] The Environmental Impacts of Bar Soap Production: Uncovering Sustainability Risks with LCA Analysis
    Gaurav, Gaurav
    Dangayach, Govind Sharan
    Meena, Makkhan Lal
    Chaudhary, Vijay
    Gupta, Sumit
    Jagtap, Sandeep
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (12)
  • [27] Analysis of the Impact of Economic Policy Uncertainty on Environmental Sustainability in Developed and Developing Economies
    Huang, Huafang
    Ali, Sharafat
    Solangi, Yasir Ahmed
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (07)
  • [28] Sustainability and the environmental impact of the tourism industry: An analysis of the hotel sector in Catalonia, Spain
    Gomez-Guillen, Juan Jose
    Tapias-Baque, David
    INTANGIBLE CAPITAL, 2024, 20 (01) : 277 - 297
  • [29] Analysis of proper ink management impact on overall environmental equipment efficiency for sustainability
    Krystosiak, Krzysztof
    Kluczek, Aldona
    Werpachowski, Wojciech
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [30] Analysis of Tetracyclines in Medicated Feed for Food Animal Production by HPLC-MS/MS
    Elvira Gavilan, Rosa
    Nebot, Carolina
    Manuel Miranda, Jose
    Martin-Gomez, Yolanda
    Vazquez-Belda, Beatriz
    Manuel Franco, Carlos
    Cepeda, Alberto
    ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL, 2016, 5 (01):