Internal Cognitive Load Differentially Influences Acoustic and Lexical Context Effects in Speech Perception: Evidence From a Population With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

被引:1
作者
Derawi, Hadeer [1 ,2 ]
Reinisch, Eva [3 ]
Gabay, Yafit [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Haifa, Dept Special Educ, Haifa, Israel
[2] Univ Haifa, Edmond J Safra Brain Res Ctr Study Learning Disabi, Haifa, Israel
[3] Austrian Acad Sci, Acoust Res Inst, Vienna, Austria
来源
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH | 2023年 / 66卷 / 10期
基金
以色列科学基金会;
关键词
PHONETIC CATEGORIZATION; TIME REPRODUCTION; ADHD; DISCRIMINATION; INFORMATION; CHILDREN; SEGMENTATION; RECOGNITION; ANXIETY; MEMORY;
D O I
10.1044/2023_JSLHR-23-00188
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Background: To overcome variability in spoken language, listeners utilize various types of context information for disambiguating speech sounds. Context effects have been shown to be affected by cognitive load. However, previous results are mixed regarding the influence of cognitive load on the use of context information in speech perception.Purpose: We tested a population characterized by an attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) to better understand the relationship between attention (or internal cognitive load) and context effects.Method: The use of acoustic versus lexical properties of the surrounding signal to disambiguate speech sounds was examined in listeners with ADHD and neurotypical listeners.Results: Compared to neurotypicals, individuals with ADHD relied more strongly on lexical context for speech perception; however, reliance on acoustic context information from speech rate did not differ.Conclusion: These findings confirm that cognitive load impacts the use of highlevel but not low-level context information in speech and imply that speech recognition deficits in ADHD likely arise due to impaired higher order cognitive processes.
引用
收藏
页码:3721 / 3734
页数:14
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [21] Spectral information in nonspeech contexts influences children's categorization of ambiguous speech sounds
    Hufnagle, Daniel G.
    Holt, Lori L.
    Thiessen, Erik D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 116 (03) : 728 - 737
  • [22] Extrinsic Cognitive Load Impairs Spoken Word Recognition in High- and Low-Predictability Sentences
    Hunter, Cynthia R.
    Pisoni, David B.
    [J]. EAR AND HEARING, 2018, 39 (02) : 378 - 389
  • [23] Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models
    Jaeger, T. Florian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2008, 59 (04) : 434 - 446
  • [24] Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives
    Jongman, A
    Wayland, R
    Wong, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2000, 108 (03) : 1252 - 1263
  • [25] Stroop interference and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A review and meta-analysis
    Lansbergen, Marieke M.
    Kenemans, J. Leon
    van Engeland, Herman
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 21 (02) : 251 - 262
  • [26] Lenth Russell V, 2024, CRAN
  • [27] LOGAN GD, 1979, J EXP PSYCHOL HUMAN, V5, P189
  • [28] Human prefrontal and sensory cortical activity during divided attention tasks
    Loose, R
    Kaufmann, C
    Auer, DP
    Lange, KW
    [J]. HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2003, 18 (04) : 249 - 259
  • [29] Eye-Tracking the Time Course of Distal and Global Speech Rate Effects
    Maslowski, Merel
    Meyer, Antje S.
    Bosker, Hans Rutger
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2020, 46 (10) : 1148 - 1163
  • [30] Effects of Acute Anxiety Induction on Speech Perception: Are Anxious Listeners Distracted Listeners?
    Mattys, S. L.
    Seymour, F.
    Attwood, A. S.
    Munafo, M. R.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2013, 24 (08) : 1606 - 1608